Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 17:24:48 Stroller wrote: > On 24 April 2012, at 08:36, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > ... > > Would someone please confirm whether this has had the desired > > effect? Many thanks. > > Thank you. Very much appreciated. I can only apologise to all that it took me so long to fin

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Stroller
On 24 April 2012, at 08:36, Peter Humphrey wrote: > ... > Would someone please confirm whether this has had the desired effect? Many > thanks. Thank you. Very much appreciated. Stroller.

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread David W Noon
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:41:19 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered: > On Tuesday 24 April 2012 01:21:33 David W Noon wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:59:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote > > > Plain text is what I have always specified. Kmai

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 01:21:33 David W Noon wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:59:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote > > Plain text is what I have always specified. Kmail seems to want to > > override my preferences. > > Try under the "Security" option of KMail Settings. That's the only reference I c

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread David W Noon
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:59:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered: > Plain text is what I have always specified. Kmail seems to want to > override my preferences. Try under the "Security" option of KMail Settings. -- Regards, Da

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday 23 April 2012 20:41:27 Stroller wrote: > So I have to either tolerate Peter's choice of font size, or I have > to sacrifice being able to read these other messages in their > optimum format. As I said in another e-mail, I have not made any such choice. Ever. > Now I appreciate that my

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Stroller wrote: > There must be 10,000 items per day listed on eBay, maybe 100,000 [OT] I believe it to be over a million per day. The site has sold something like 750,000 items per day since its beginning on average, and many more items are listed than sold.

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Stroller
On 23 April 2012, at 19:53, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> … >> We all noticed that you are using KMail once more, because you are >> sending HTML messages with a huge font and bold typeface to the list. >> >> Any chance of you reconfiguring KMail not to send HTML messages? >> Please ... pretty ple

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:06:08 -0500, Dale wrote: > >>> Thanks again for the help : I'm now back in my 2007 machine >>> & able to send e-mails. You actually have to remove the offensive >>> file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! > > The problem here is that

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:06:08 -0500, Dale wrote: > > Thanks again for the help : I'm now back in my 2007 machine > > & able to send e-mails. You actually have to remove the offensive > > file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! The problem here is that the file is created automati

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Stroller
On 21 April 2012, at 15:25, Philip Webb wrote: > 120421 Dale wrote: >> Philip Webb wrote: >>> You actually have to remove the offensive file >>> from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! >> That's the same way files in /etc/portage/ works too. >> I do wish we could put a # on the front

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Dale
Philip Webb wrote: > 120421 Dale wrote: >> Philip Webb wrote: >>> You actually have to remove the offensive file >>> from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! >> That's the same way files in /etc/portage/ works too. >> I do wish we could put a # on the front to make it ignore files. >> We

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Philip Webb
120421 Dale wrote: > Philip Webb wrote: >> You actually have to remove the offensive file >> from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! > That's the same way files in /etc/portage/ works too. > I do wish we could put a # on the front to make it ignore files. > We can dream I guess. Yes &

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Dale
Philip Webb wrote: > Thanks again for the help : I'm now back in my 2007 machine > & able to send e-mails. You actually have to remove the offensive file > from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! > Between Intel & Udev, I'm feeling somewhat abused today, > but Gentoo User mailing-list

[gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Philip Webb
Thanks again for the help : I'm now back in my 2007 machine & able to send e-mails. You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! Between Intel & Udev, I'm feeling somewhat abused today, but Gentoo User mailing-list came thro' yet again : I hope