On 03/04/2017 10:51 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On March 4, 2017 11:01:38 PM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>
>> I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35"
>>
>> make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2
>> * ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase):
>> * emake failed
>>
On March 4, 2017 11:01:38 PM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35"
>
>make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2
> * ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase):
> * emake failed
> *
>* If you need support, post the output of `emerge -
On 03/04/2017 03:01 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
> I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35"
>
> make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2
> * ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase):
> * emake failed
> *
[snip]
I advanced a bit, now I'm getting:
make: *** [Mak
I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35"
make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2
* ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase):
* emake failed
*
* If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info
'=dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo'`,
* the complete build log and the out
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 13:02:01 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > >=sys-fs/eudev-1.3 required by (virtual/udev-215:0/0::gentoo,
> > >installed)
> >
> > (sys-fs/udev-225-r1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
> > in by
> >> =sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86
On 02/05/2017 12:52 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2017 03:20 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:47:24 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>
>>> !!! existing preserved libs:
>> package: sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r5
>>> * - /usr/lib64/libpanelw.so.5
>>> * - /us
On 02/04/2017 03:20 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:47:24 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> !!! existing preserved libs:
> package: sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r5
>> * - /usr/lib64/libpanelw.so.5
>> * - /usr/lib64/libpanelw.so.5.9
>> * used
>> by
>> /usr/lib64/o
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:47:24 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> !!! existing preserved libs:
> >>> package: sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r5
> * - /usr/lib64/libpanelw.so.5
> * - /usr/lib64/libpanelw.so.5.9
> * used
> by
> /usr/lib64/openoffice/program/python-core-2.7.6/lib/lib-dynload/_cur
On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
My next box is giving me hard time as well. It keeps reinstalling OpenOffice
in circle:
>>> Installing (1 of 1) app-office/openoffice-bin-4.1.2::gentoo
* Updating desktop
On my other system (one year old as well, without upgrades) I'm having problem
with python.
I was getting an error:
dev-lang/python-2.7.10-r4:2.7 (">> Installing (1 of 5) dev-lang/python-3.4.5::gentoo
>>> neededobj /usr/lib64/libpython3.4.so.1.0
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr
On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
[snip]
The upgrade after 1-year was mainly successful, with all your help,
THANK YOU!
Only two miner glitches:
1.) Failed to set XATTR_PAX markings -me
But I'm not the on
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 18:52:59 +, Mick wrote:
> > > >You run perl-cleaner after updating perl, you need to cleanse your
> > > >world
> > > >file before you update perl.
> > >
> > > Perl-cleaner does the cleansing as well these days. Which is
> > > extremely convenient.
> >
> > Does it? Tha
On Wednesday 01 Feb 2017 08:39:18 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 06:57:25 +, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > >> I'm trying my luck with: perl-cleaner all
> > >
> > >You run perl-cleaner after updating perl, you need to cleanse your
> > >world
> > >file before you update perl.
> >
> > Perl-
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 06:57:25 +, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> I'm trying my luck with: perl-cleaner all
> >
> >You run perl-cleaner after updating perl, you need to cleanse your
> >world
> >file before you update perl.
>
> Perl-cleaner does the cleansing as well these days. Which is extremely
On February 1, 2017 1:59:27 AM GMT+01:00, Neil Bothwick
wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:54:22 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> > A number of perl modules have gone from being separate packages to
>> > part of the core perl distribution (this was covered in a news
>item).
>> > You need to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:54:22 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > A number of perl modules have gone from being separate packages to
> > part of the core perl distribution (this was covered in a news item).
> > You need to make sure there are no perl packages have crept into
> > @world, which
On 01/31/2017 05:36 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:19:01 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> How do I solve this perl dependency? I was always confused about these
>> dependencies.
>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
>> pulled !!! into
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:19:01 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> How do I solve this perl dependency? I was always confused about these
> dependencies.
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
> pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
On 01/31/2017 04:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:24:21 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> When I try to exclude the "dev-ruby/racc:
>> emerge -uDNavq --exclude dev-libs/icu --exclude dev-libs/boost
>> --exclude dev-ruby/racc world
>>
>> I'm getting another error:
>
>
On 01/31/2017 04:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:24:21 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> When I try to exclude the "dev-ruby/racc:
>> emerge -uDNavq --exclude dev-libs/icu --exclude dev-libs/boost
>> --exclude dev-ruby/racc world
>>
>> I'm getting another error:
>
>
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:24:21 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> When I try to exclude the "dev-ruby/racc:
> emerge -uDNavq --exclude dev-libs/icu --exclude dev-libs/boost
> --exclude dev-ruby/racc world
>
> I'm getting another error:
Try to reduce the amount of packages being updated at onc
On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
[snip]
I got stuck on "dev-ruby/racc"
>>> Failed to emerge dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11, Log file:
>>> '/var/log/portage/dev-ruby:racc-1.4.11:20170131-232501.log'
>>> Jobs: 133 of 36
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:11:18 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I got stuck on: dev-libs/boost-1.62.0-r1
>
> i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++: error: unrecognized command line option
> ‘-std=c++14’ ...failed updating 1 target...
> * ERROR: dev-libs/boost-1.62.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase):
> *
Thelma
On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
[snip]
I got stuck on: dev-libs/boost-1.62.0-r1
i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++14’
...failed updating 1 target...
* ERROR
On 30/01/2017 22:32, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
>> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems.
>>
> [snip]
>
>
> OK, I have just few bl
On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems.
>
[snip]
OK, I have just few blockers. What to do with them?
I have grup-0.97-r16 installed i
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:13:28 +, Stroller wrote:
> One of my hacks is to compile a list of outdated packages in a text
> file, then apply commands like `for package in $(cat list.txt) ; do
> emerge -1 $package ; done`. It's dirty and kludgy, but if you have 100
> files to update and 80 of them
> On 29 Jan 2017, at 20:56, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems.
>
> What is my best option, re-install from scratch, upgrade in stages etc.
> With firef
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:22:14 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Also, I'd start with @system first, then work on @world.
> > Only bad thing is, KDE, if you have it installed, is in @system
> > because of dependencies, last I checked anyway. That will make
> > @system a lot of fun itself.
>
> It
On Sunday 29 Jan 2017 15:32:22 Dale wrote:
> Might I also add, the -t option can reveal what is causing what
> sometimes.
It's never helped me though: whatever can't be installed breaks the tree
building so I get no indentation.
> Also, I'd start with @system first, then work on @world.
> Only
On Sunday, January 29, 2017 3:32:22 PM CET Dale wrote:
> Might I also add, the -t option can reveal what is causing what
> sometimes. Also, I'd start with @system first, then work on @world.
> Only bad thing is, KDE, if you have it installed, is in @system because
> of dependencies, last I checked
On 01/29/2017 03:33 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 30/01/2017 00:25, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:32:22PM -0600, Dale wrote:
>>
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 01/29/2017 03:25 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:32:22PM -0600, Dale wrote:
>>
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into
> prob
On 01/29/2017 03:25 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:32:22PM -0600, Dale wrote:
>
I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into
problems.
What is my best opt
On 01/29/2017 02:43 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 01/29/2017 03:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
>> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems.
>>
>
> Ugh, you're in for it. The ncurses up
On 30/01/2017 00:25, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:32:22PM -0600, Dale wrote:
>
I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into
problems.
What is my best option,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:32:22PM -0600, Dale wrote:
> >> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
> >> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into
> >> problems.
> >>
> >> What is my best option, re-install from scratch, upgrade in stages etc.
>
On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 13:56:00 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into
> problems.
The advice you've already been given is all good. I would add that you
should mak
On 01/29/2017 03:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems.
>
Ugh, you're in for it. The ncurses update requires --backtrack=100 or
something like that. In
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 29/01/2017 22:56, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
>> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems.
>>
>> What is my best option, re-install from scratch, upgrade in stages et
On 29/01/2017 22:56, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems.
>
> What is my best option, re-install from scratch, upgrade in stages etc.
> With firefox-bin I'm
I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems.
What is my best option, re-install from scratch, upgrade in stages etc.
With firefox-bin I'm getting:
emerge -p firefox-bin
These are the packages that
42 matches
Mail list logo