Re: [gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:11:46 + Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:04:14 -0600, Dan wrote: here's the output from the system log, i use metalog so that's /var/log/everything/current. Jan 14 10:02:02 [kernel] usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 2 Jan 14 10:02:08 [kernel] ohci_hcd :00:02.0: wakeup Jan 14 10:02:08 [kernel] usb 2-4: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3 Jan 14 10:02:09 [kernel] usb 2-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice dmesg: usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 2 ohci_hcd :00:02.0: wakeup usb 2-4: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3 usb 2-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice That's it? There would normally be several lines after that showing the device's identification. perhaps in another log somewhere, but i use the niash drivers and they don't have configuration options, they might be a little quieter than yours. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c
OK, so it's not a permissions issue. What shows up in your syslog when you connect the scannner? If you use syslog-ng, run tail -f /var/log/message then connect the scanner. here's the output from the system log, i use metalog so that's /var/log/everything/current. Jan 14 10:02:02 [kernel] usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 2 Jan 14 10:02:08 [kernel] ohci_hcd :00:02.0: wakeup Jan 14 10:02:08 [kernel] usb 2-4: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3 Jan 14 10:02:09 [kernel] usb 2-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice dmesg: usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 2 ohci_hcd :00:02.0: wakeup usb 2-4: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3 usb 2-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice anything else you think would be helpful? Just ask. --dan. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c
On AD 2007 January 13 Saturday 12:22:25 PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: Don't apologise, if you know it's wrong, don't do it. Not only do I get two copies of your mail, but of every response when someone uses Reply to All :( That's the way some mailing lists work because it's more 'RFC compliant' and stuff. Justin -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c
On Sunday 14 January 2007 11:38, Justin Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c': On AD 2007 January 13 Saturday 12:22:25 PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: Don't apologise, if you know it's wrong, don't do it. Not only do I get two copies of your mail, but of every response when someone uses Reply to All :( That's the way some mailing lists work because it's more 'RFC compliant' and stuff. I'd like to hear what RFC that suggests CCing the author of the email by default, please. From what I understand the recommended default reply behavior is to reply to only the Reply-To or, if that header is absent, From header. Reply to all to a feature that all MUAs should have, but it's used more often with large multiple TO+CC addresses rather than on lists. -- If there's one thing we've established over the years, it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest clue what's best for them in terms of package stability. -- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh pgpShn0O7uqhY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:04:14 -0600, Dan wrote: here's the output from the system log, i use metalog so that's /var/log/everything/current. Jan 14 10:02:02 [kernel] usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 2 Jan 14 10:02:08 [kernel] ohci_hcd :00:02.0: wakeup Jan 14 10:02:08 [kernel] usb 2-4: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3 Jan 14 10:02:09 [kernel] usb 2-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice dmesg: usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 2 ohci_hcd :00:02.0: wakeup usb 2-4: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3 usb 2-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice That's it? There would normally be several lines after that showing the device's identification. -- Neil Bothwick We are upping our standards - so up yours. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:12:57 +0100, Mihamina Rakotomandimby (R12y) wrote: As root: # scanimage --list-devices No scanners were identified. [...] # sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner [...] found USB scanner [...] As normal user: $ scanimage --list-devices No scanners were identified. $ sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner [...] found USB scanner [...] OK, so it's not a permissions issue. What shows up in your syslog when you connect the scannner? If you use syslog-ng, run tail -f /var/log/message then connect the scanner. PS: Sorry for the CCing, just to up the thread. Don't apologise, if you know it's wrong, don't do it. Not only do I get two copies of your mail, but of every response when someone uses Reply to All :( -- Neil Bothwick Bother, said Pooh, as Smurfette got dressed. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:28:47 +0100, Mihamina Rakotomandimby (R12y) wrote: When I launch xsane, it says it does not detect any device. I launch it as user, I already added me to the scanner group. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0 [Hewlett-Packard], product=0x0605 [HP ScanJet 2200C], chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:003:003 found USB scanner (vendor=0x05e1, product=0x0501) at libusb:001:003 What are the results of running scanimage --list-devices both as root and a normal user? Permission problems can cause scanimage or xsane to not find the scanner while sane-find-scanner will. -- Neil Bothwick What do you have when you have six lawyers buried up to their necks in sand? Not enough sand. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:19 +, Neil Bothwick wrote: What are the results of running scanimage --list-devices both as root and a normal user? Permission problems can cause scanimage or xsane to not find the scanner while sane-find-scanner will. As root: # scanimage --list-devices No scanners were identified. [...] # sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner [...] found USB scanner [...] As normal user: $ scanimage --list-devices No scanners were identified. $ sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner [...] found USB scanner [...] I know my scanner uses plustek driver, and I already edited /etc/sane.d/plustek.conf, but I dont know how to exclude all other configuration files so that they dont disturb mine... PS: Sorry for the CCing, just to up the thread. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c
On AD 2007 January 12 Friday 11:12:57 PM +0100, Mihamina Rakotomandimby (R12y) wrote: On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:19 +, Neil Bothwick wrote: What are the results of running scanimage --list-devices both as root and a normal user? Permission problems can cause scanimage or xsane to not find the scanner while sane-find-scanner will. As root: # scanimage --list-devices No scanners were identified. [...] # sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner [...] found USB scanner [...] As normal user: $ scanimage --list-devices No scanners were identified. $ sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner [...] found USB scanner [...] I don't have much experience with USB devices or how udev handles them in /dev. All my experience which is quite limited would suggest that it is still a permission issue. You could find the (ephemeral) device file(s) and check the perms on them and then issue the groups command to check against. My guess is you still have a permission problem that is more likely due to /etc/groups than to /etc/udev.d. Justin -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c
I don't have much experience with USB devices or how udev handles them in /dev. All my experience which is quite limited would suggest that it is still a permission issue. You could find the (ephemeral) device file(s) and check the perms on them and then issue the groups command to check against. My guess is you still have a permission problem that is more likely due to /etc/groups than to /etc/udev.d you may have to relogin as your user to apply the new group settings; you may also have to be in the USB group; you may also have to unplug and replug the scanner once after you add yourself to those groups. Just to be clear, I use Xsane and an HP Scanjet, i think 4300 C, something close to that, and permission issues like this don't effect root, so that would be agood way to test. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] usb scanner HP2200c
Hi, I have an USB scanner HP2200c. It is automatically detected and used with Fedora and Ubuntu. But on my personnal laptop, I use Gentoo and I would like it to be detected. I have installed xsane and its dependencies (sane-backends, hplip,...) When I launch xsane, it says it does not detect any device. I launch it as user, I already added me to the scanner group. # grep mihamina /etc/group root::0:root,mihamina disk::6:root,adm,mihamina wheel::10:root,mihamina audio::18:mihamina cdrom::19:mihamina cdrw::80:mihamina portage::250:portage,root,mihamina mihamina:x:1000: scanner:!:1002:mihamina I did not touch any of the files under /etc/sane.d/. And last: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sane-find-scanner -q found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0 [Hewlett-Packard], product=0x0605 [HP ScanJet 2200C], chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:003:003 found USB scanner (vendor=0x05e1, product=0x0501) at libusb:001:003 The second found device is an embeded webcam. Nothing to do with a scanner. What should I do to make my scanner detected by xsane? Thank you. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
