On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:07:29AM -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote
IMHO move on to mozilla, unless there really is something showstopping
holding you to netscrape.
*shudder* have not used netscrape for many moons, didn't even know you
could still get it?
Still strong: :: Win: currently 7.2
Mike Williams wrote:
On Monday 11 April 2005 23:18, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
;);) (I've started to mount it read only so at least an error
came up)
I always leave it mounted since it makes little real difference
security wise. seriously, what does it protects you against when a
compromise can
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 01:07 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote:
Can Mozilla SHARE the Win/Netscape bookmarks, history, eddress-book,
**and** local accumulated-mail folders with my Win/Netscape ?
I understand that the answer is yes, although I have not done it. I
think the answer would be the same for
Robert G. Hays wrote:
In the Gentoo manual, in the early stages, it mentions -tT; nearby
below, it mentions another hdparm line to speed things up.
Did you try that line?
I've tried it. The result is 19.11 MB/sec.
But why are the values posted before so different? hdparm -vid /dev/hda
Alexander Veit wrote:
geometry = 4867/255/63, sectors = 78198750, start = 0
geometry = 65535/16/63, sectors = 4003776, start = 0
Well, the obvious thing for me is the difference in the drive geometries
between the two systems...the 2.6 kernel is seeing the entire drive
while
Richard Fish wrote:
Alexander Veit wrote:
geometry = 4867/255/63, sectors = 78198750, start = 0
geometry = 65535/16/63, sectors = 4003776, start = 0
Well, the obvious thing for me is the difference in the drive
geometries
between the two systems...the 2.6 kernel is
On Apr 11, 2005 12:58 PM, Robert G. Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, we know what the drive can do; at least, At Least!, so I am left
suspecting that the Gentoo kernel does not have the best setup for the
mobo, --or-- has something in there for safety that has the effect of
slowing the
If you go the make 'config route, *do* by all means read all the help
you can find in there before changing thins; you cwill probably find
something that interacts with something else that you've already done
that makes what you've already done irrelevant or -wrong-, so read all
through the
Robert G. Hays wrote:
Well, we know what the drive can do; at least, At Least!, so
I am left suspecting that the Gentoo kernel does not have the
best setup for the mobo, --or-- has something in there for
safety that has the effect of slowing the throughput down;
make [ menuconfig |
probably that you forget 50% of the times the
# mount /boot
;) (I've started to mount it read only so at least an error came up)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I seem to recall that the make install script will spit out an error
if it doesn't find grub or lilo in /boot, which would
On Apr 11, 2005 11:59 AM, Alexander Veit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas how to get the same disk performance with Gentoo?
Thanks in advance
Alex
Alex,
Does Knoppix enable /proc/config.gz? If so look there.
Also, do you see anything much different about modules being loaded
On Apr 11, 2005 3:18 PM, Eric S. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
Matthew Cline wrote:
I recommend using genkernel for creating a kernel. You still have to
deal with configuring yourself, but then Gentoo deals with the compile
and moving the kernel around
Richard Fish wrote:
Snip!
# time dd if=/dev/hda bs=64k count=16000
(time the reading of 1G of data from hda).
Feel free to adjust count to your liking...although it should be at
least twice memory. At 20M/sec you are looking at about 1G/min for reading.
-Richard
(And how many -- or rather how
I've saved your listing, when I next boot to linux, I'll dif that
against what I have (before W4L) let you know *IF* I notice something
meaningful -- kinda new to this part, too, me, but I'll try.
Might be 24+ hours before I get back from linux -- only do mail in
Netscape 7.1, which I only
On Monday 11 April 2005 23:18, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
;);) (I've started to mount it read only so at least an error came up)
I always leave it mounted since it makes little real difference security
wise. seriously, what does it protects you against when a compromise
can probably also
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Snip!
seriously, what does it protects you against when a compromise can
probably also mount it then unmount it again as a courtesy
What Mark said ::
Just the random rm / ...
Also some *strange* internal errors I've seen over the years, and...
if the computer is
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:44:20 -0400
Robert G. Hays wrote:
Might be 24+ hours before I get back from linux -- only do mail in
Netscape 7.1, which I only have in Win at the moment; working to get
linux full for my needs, which will include Netscape.
IMHO move on to mozilla, unless there
Continued at Bottom...
Nick Rout wrote:
Robert G. Hays wrote:
Might be 24+ hours before I get back from linux -- only do mail in
Netscape 7.1, which I only have in Win at the moment; working to get
linux full for my needs, which will include Netscape.
IMHO move on to mozilla, unless there
Alexander Veit wrote:
I've changed the access mode from auto to lba. The same results.
Then from lba to large. Same results.
Ok, thanks for trying. It was worth a shot.
Also, it might be interesting to see the dmesg output for the IDE
controller.
With access mode set to lba (this
19 matches
Mail list logo
