On 19 July 2011, at 20:41, Grant wrote:
...
I found this:
We recommend using the Just Scan mode with 1080i and 1080p material,
which assures zero overscan and proper 1:1 pixel matching for this
1080p display.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 19 July 2011, at 20:41, Grant wrote:
...
I found this:
We recommend using the Just Scan mode with 1080i and 1080p material,
which assures zero overscan and proper 1:1 pixel matching for this
1080p display.
--snip--
The TV is an LG 47LH90 and and it is said to do 1080p. I looked for
ghosting in 16:9 mode instead of Just Scan mode and strangely the
shadows are there, but they're oriented top and bottom instead of left
and right. I can take another photo if anyone would like to see.
On 01/-10/37 11:59, Grant wrote:
--snip--
The TV is an LG 47LH90 and and it is said to do 1080p. I looked for
ghosting in 16:9 mode instead of Just Scan mode and strangely the
shadows are there, but they're oriented top and bottom instead of left
and right. I can take another photo if anyone
--snip--
The TV is an LG 47LH90 and and it is said to do 1080p. I looked for
ghosting in 16:9 mode instead of Just Scan mode and strangely the
shadows are there, but they're oriented top and bottom instead of left
and right. I can take another photo if anyone would like to see.
Why do I
On Tuesday 19 Jul 2011 20:41:08 Grant wrote:
--snip--
The TV is an LG 47LH90 and and it is said to do 1080p. I looked for
ghosting in 16:9 mode instead of Just Scan mode and strangely the
shadows are there, but they're oriented top and bottom instead of left
and right. I can take
On 17 July 2011, at 17:54, Grant wrote:
...
But at some point the 1s and 0s must be converted to some sort of an
analog signal if only right behind the diode. A diode must be
presented with a signal in some sort of analog form in order to
illuminate, right? Digital is just a figment of our
...
But at some point the 1s and 0s must be converted to some sort of an
analog signal if only right behind the diode. A diode must be
presented with a signal in some sort of analog form in order to
illuminate, right? Digital is just a figment of our imagination after
all.
The pixel is
But at some point the 1s and 0s must be converted to some sort of an
analog signal if only right behind the diode. A diode must be
presented with a signal in some sort of analog form in order to
illuminate, right? Digital is just a figment of our imagination after
all.
The pixel is either
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same problem with xf86-video-ati. I tried to
enable
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I gave it a try but there was no change. I tried plugging the TV and
computer into a power strip and also into an isolation transformer.
Any other ideas?
Late to the party, but what kind of display? What connection are you
I gave it a try but there was no change. I tried plugging the TV and
computer into a power strip and also into an isolation transformer.
Any other ideas?
Late to the party, but what kind of display? What connection are you
using to get from the card to the display? (i.e. I've got an LCD TV
meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
Hi Grant,
another shot into an even much deeper dark ;)
May be you have a problem here, which it is called Brummschleife
in german...sorry dont know the English equivalent...may be something
like buzzing loop...but this looks more like a strange
Roger Mason rma...@mun.ca [11-07-13 18:12]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
Hi Grant,
another shot into an even much deeper dark ;)
May be you have a problem here, which it is called Brummschleife
in german...sorry dont know the English equivalent...may be something
like
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same problem with xf86-video-ati. I tried to
enable the
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com [11-07-13 19:20]:
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same problem with xf86-video-ati. I tried to
enable the new
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com [11-07-13 03:13]:
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same problem
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same problem with xf86-video-ati. I tried to
enable the new
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com [11-07-10 01:42]:
When I was using an Nvidia video card, I noticed a strange sort of
fuzzy edge effect if I used nvidia-drivers. xf86-video-nouveau didn't
have the same problem. Now I've switched to an ATI video card and
unfortunately I have the same problem with
20 matches
Mail list logo
