I have a bit of a situation as I plan to do upgrade/install gentoo
for the following systems:
(All these systems are currently running gentoo (2.6.11) with
the portage snapshot of 20051009)
System Processor./HW some info.
[1] Cyrix c7 Runs
So if a mail is sent to A and B and only A is a valid user, both copies
go to postmaster?
Exactly. This wasn't a problem as one employee would sift through the
postmaster email every day, that was until spammers started spamming
randomly generated addresses at their domain. She received all
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:35:28 +0100 Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
either. As an extra bonus eupdatedb (which does look go through the vdb too)
is a lot slower that its eix equivalent (update-eix). ;) So can anyone
mention any advantage of esearch compared to eix?
I like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Erik wrote:
I had this problem for a while as well. Adding 'noapic' to my boot
options fixed it for me. I think it's a problem with certain
motherboards, like the Asus M2NPV-VM.
Thank you Erik. That worked and allowed me to boot with the
· Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
snip
The advantage of EVMS over LVM in this case would be, that he
wouldn't have to reformat/repartition and would still be able
to resize the partition/filesystem, wouldn't he?
snip
Yes, with reiserfs, this can be done. But also with
Neil Bothwick:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:00:09 +0200, Sergio Polini wrote:
May I undo an emerge --sync?
Only be restoring from a previously made backup or another computer
that you haven't synced yet.
I apologize for my delay.
What have I to backup to be able to restore a previous sync?
Are
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 19:57 +0100, Sergio Polini wrote:
Neil Bothwick:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:00:09 +0200, Sergio Polini wrote:
May I undo an emerge --sync?
Only be restoring from a previously made backup or another computer
that you haven't synced yet.
I apologize for my delay.
On 11/18/06, Robert Cernansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
eix gives following output on the same request:
$ eix -cA app-misc/screen
[I] app-misc/screen (4.0.2-r5): Screen is a full-screen ...
[N] app-misc/screenie (): Screenie is a small and ...
Hmm, eix 0.8.1 on my system produces:
[N]
* Shawn Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06-11-17 09:10]:
In ( what seems like ) similar situatoins, I've just let the partition
that I want to share b/w OSes just be a NTFS partition if say, I
were dual-booting my machine ( Linux Windows ). IMHO, Linux support
for NTFS is fine, meaning that I've not
Michael Sullivan:
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 19:57 +0100, Sergio Polini wrote:
Neil Bothwick:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:00:09 +0200, Sergio Polini wrote:
May I undo an emerge --sync?
Only be restoring from a previously made backup or another
computer that you haven't synced yet.
I
Hi,
I returned to gentoo to be able to install blender 2.4*.
Well, the ebuild is there, but ...
emerge blender
...
g++ -pipe -funsigned-char -march=i686 -O2 -pipe -Wall -W -DGAMEBLENDER=1
-DUSE_BULLET -DUSE_SUMO_SOLID -DNDEBUG -DFTGL_STATIC_LIBRARY
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/FTGL
When I run 'emerge -Davu world' I get this message (and the emerge
fails):
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy gnome-base/gnome-libs have
been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete
your request:
-
[Subject corrected to gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 masked?]
--- Vladimir
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 21:28 -0800, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
When I run 'emerge -Davu world' I get this message (and the emerge
fails):
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy gnome-base/gnome-libs have
I am annoyed with using vfat on my USB flash drives because I cannot
get proper permissions and ownership. Not for the security (meaningless
on a drive that easy to steal, unless encrypted), but annoying anyway.
Is there any technical reason I should not repartition it as something else
-- ext3
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 09:05:09AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Walter, did you actually get a license somehow? When I look on their
pages unders `product licensing'. A `VMware Product Licensing' page
appears with no real indication of which license or even what product
is being
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I am annoyed with using vfat on my USB flash drives because I cannot
get proper permissions and ownership. Not for the security (meaningless
on a drive that easy to steal, unless encrypted), but annoying anyway.
Is there any technical reason I should not repartition it as
On 11/19/06, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same response as gtkdiff. Do you actually use them? If not, why do you care?
Apologies for the out-of-context line that should have been removed
before I clicked send. Call it a case of email Tourrettes.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
On 11/18/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to remember reading somewhere that one shouldn't use a
journalling file system on flash-based devices such as USB drives (i.e.
you should use ext2 rather than ext3), but I can't find the reference
right now. Can anyone clarify this for me?
18 matches
Mail list logo
