I remember having a similar issue. Try blocking all gcc versions prior to 4.0.
As for uninstalling the current 3.x version -- I don't know how you would
remove it since you need the ebuild script that initially installed the current
3.x on your system to remove it safely. Have you updated your
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:01:57 -0500, Richard Marzan wrote:
I don't know how you would remove it since you need the ebuild script
that initially installed the current 3.x on your system to remove it
safely.
Which is kept in /var/db/pkg
--
Neil Bothwick
Do Roman paramedics refer to IV's as
On Monday 26 January 2009 12:01:57 Richard Marzan wrote:
I remember having a similar issue. Try blocking all gcc versions prior to
4.0. As for uninstalling the current 3.x version -- I don't know how you
would remove it since you need the ebuild script that initially installed
the current 3.x
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:43:01AM +0200, Maxim Kremenev wrote:
Maybe u try exec firefox in console and send output ?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Willie Wong ww...@princeton.edu wrote:
Disclaimer: I am using a hardened x86 system.
Just now I updated to Firefox 3.0.5 (which is now
Hello,
I'm using Gentoo on my laptop and quite often the graphic output goes
mad. There are messed lines and the contend is not readable. I've made
screen shots (attached). Please, could someone help me?
In the system log I've found these lines:
[drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20060119 on minor 0
Willie Wong wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:43:01AM +0200, Maxim Kremenev wrote:
Maybe u try exec firefox in console and send output ?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Willie Wong ww...@princeton.edu wrote:
Disclaimer: I am using a hardened x86 system.
Just now I updated to
I've googled a bit and found these two things:
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/175464
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/51591
They both refer to problems with hald and acpid entering in conflict.
Check if you are using hald. If you are, try stopping it and starting
acpid to
I'd like to install the latest miro from their nightlies and that
means installing manually without an ebuild. I've always avoided this
because I don't want files spread across my system without an easy way
to remove them. I've also always wanted to set up a good cruft
removal script for keeping
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:41:52 -0800
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you guys think of this? Do you know of a good cruft removal script?
Yep, there's quite good one in gentoo itself.
Basically, you'll need to write a short config for it, consisting of
lines like cruft name, cruft src
On Mon, January 26, 2009 17:48, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:41:52 -0800
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you guys think of this? Do you know of a good cruft removal
script?
Yep, there's quite good one in gentoo itself.
Basically, you'll need to write a short
What do you guys think of this? Do you know of a good cruft removal script?
Yep, there's quite good one in gentoo itself.
Basically, you'll need to write a short config for it, consisting of
lines like cruft name, cruft src uri and a few more lines if you'll
need to pass some extra
Grant wrote:
What do you guys think of this? Do you know of a good cruft removal script?
Yep, there's quite good one in gentoo itself.
Basically, you'll need to write a short config for it, consisting of
lines like cruft name, cruft src uri and a few more lines if you'll
need to
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:35:13 -0800
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose you and Jesus are right, but what about cruft removal? Are
you saying Gentoo is 100% cruft-free? I've got a lot of junk in /etc
and especially ~/.*
Oh, that's not a bug, it's a feature (C) some_unknown_company
Cool. Thanks. That looks like it should solve the issue.
Ben
- Original Message
From: Gregory SACRE gregory.sa...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 11:32:32 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Laptop Lid Close...
I've googled a bit and found these
On (26/01/09 09:35) Grant wrote:
What do you guys think of this? Do you know of a good cruft removal
script?
Yep, there's quite good one in gentoo itself.
Basically, you'll need to write a short config for it, consisting of
lines like cruft name, cruft src uri and a few more lines
Mike Kazantsev a écrit :
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:11:04 +0100
laurent laur...@logiquefloue.org wrote:
Now I see more what ssmtp and msmtp are about so I have some questions.
Is it possible to use an existing smtp port with them and be able to
change the sender e-mail from my apache
What do you guys think of this? Do you know of a good cruft removal
script?
Yep, there's quite good one in gentoo itself.
Basically, you'll need to write a short config for it, consisting of
lines like cruft name, cruft src uri and a few more lines if you'll
need to pass some extra
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:09:03 +0100
laurent laur...@logiquefloue.org wrote:
dig -x myip
answer back my domain name. I don't know if I am being behinde a
firewall. It's a dedicated server on a domain own by my host service.
That's perfectly normal and fine for hosting, I was referring to
I'm confused on how to run wireshark on Gentoo. The ebuild says:
* With version 0.99.7, all function calls that require elevated privileges
* have been moved out of the GUI to dumpcap. WIRESHARK CONTAINS OVER ONE
* POINT FIVE MILLION LINES OF SOURCE CODE. DO NOT RUN THEM AS ROOT.
*
* NOTE:
Grant wrote:
What do you guys think of this? Do you know of a good cruft removal
script?
Yep, there's quite good one in gentoo itself.
Basically, you'll need to write a short config for it, consisting of
lines like cruft name, cruft src uri and a few more lines if you'll
need
Grant schrieb am 26.01.2009 18:35:
I suppose you and Jesus are right, but what about cruft removal? Are
you saying Gentoo is 100% cruft-free? I've got a lot of junk in /etc
and especially ~/.*
No it isn't, but this is very hard to automate cruft detection via
scripts as you still have to
Grant wrote:
I'm confused on how to run wireshark on Gentoo. The ebuild says:
* With version 0.99.7, all function calls that require elevated privileges
* have been moved out of the GUI to dumpcap. WIRESHARK CONTAINS OVER ONE
* POINT FIVE MILLION LINES OF SOURCE CODE. DO NOT RUN THEM AS
Mike Kazantsev a écrit :
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:09:03 +0100
laurent laur...@logiquefloue.org wrote:
dig -x myip
answer back my domain name. I don't know if I am being behinde a
firewall. It's a dedicated server on a domain own by my host service.
That's perfectly normal and fine
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you guys think of this? Do you know of a good cruft removal
script?
Yep, there's quite good one in gentoo itself.
Basically, you'll need to write a short config for it, consisting of
lines like cruft name, cruft
On Mon, January 26, 2009 18:35, Grant wrote:
What do you guys think of this? Do you know of a good cruft removal
script?
Yep, there's quite good one in gentoo itself.
Basically, you'll need to write a short config for it, consisting of
lines like cruft name, cruft src uri and a few more
Claws-mail
version 3.7.0
Locale: en_US.UTF-8 (charset: UTF-8)
Spell checker could not be started.
Couldn't initialize en dictionary:
(null)
Couldn't initialize en speller.
eix app-dicts/*en
[I] app-dicts/aspell-en
Available versions: 0.51.0 0.51.1 6.0.0
Installed versions:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Paul
Hi all,
Other than Office 2007 is there any software out there that can *write* .docx?
Work requires me to use this format sometimes (it's not negotiable) and I can
get around it 95% of the time, but the 5% causes me insane amounts of grief.
Even though Office2007 runs perfectly well in
I suppose you and Jesus are right, but what about cruft removal? Are
you saying Gentoo is 100% cruft-free? I've got a lot of junk in /etc
and especially ~/.*
No it isn't, but this is very hard to automate cruft detection via
scripts as you still have to decide yourself if a file is really
I think if you enable auditing in the kernel and emerge
sys-process/audit you can see the access history of any file on your
system. (doesn't help after the fact, but going forward...) At least
then you could see which user/program did things to which files. I
think even if a file is missing
On Mon, January 26, 2009 21:17, Grant wrote:
Writing an ebuild is best, but sometimes you just want to give a
program a try without writing an ebuild (like everyone else running
Linux does) and a scruft script enables you to do that without making
a mess of your system.
Not to be picky, it's
I'm confused on how to run wireshark on Gentoo. The ebuild says:
* With version 0.99.7, all function calls that require elevated privileges
* have been moved out of the GUI to dumpcap. WIRESHARK CONTAINS OVER ONE
* POINT FIVE MILLION LINES OF SOURCE CODE. DO NOT RUN THEM AS ROOT.
*
*
Writing an ebuild is best, but sometimes you just want to give a
program a try without writing an ebuild (like everyone else running
Linux does) and a scruft script enables you to do that without making
a mess of your system.
Not to be picky, it's just an idea but in that case, isn't it way
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Writing an ebuild is best, but sometimes you just want to give a
program a try without writing an ebuild (like everyone else running
Linux does) and a scruft script enables you to do that without making
a mess of your system.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Writing an ebuild is best, but sometimes you just want to give a
program a try without writing an ebuild (like everyone else running
Linux does)
Grant schrieb am 26.01.2009 21:17:
Thank you Daniel and Dale and everyone for their opinions regarding
this. Adding a list of files tracked by portage to a list of files
specified by me and reporting on the different sounds like a very
useful thing to me. Daniel, can you remember anything
On Mon, January 26, 2009 21:44, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Writing an ebuild is best, but sometimes you just want to give a
program a try without writing an ebuild (like everyone else running
Linux does) and a scruft script enables
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Other than Office 2007 is there any software out there that can *write* .docx?
Work requires me to use this format sometimes (it's not negotiable) and I can
get around it 95% of the time, but the 5% causes me insane amounts of grief.
Even though Office2007 runs perfectly
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Peter Ruskin
peter.rus...@dsl.pipex.com wrote:
On Monday 26 January 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Hi all,
Other than Office 2007 is there any software out there that can
*write* .docx?
Work requires me to use this format sometimes (it's not
negotiable) and I
2009/1/26 Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.compaul.hartman%2bgen...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Peter Ruskin
peter.rus...@dsl.pipex.com wrote:
On Monday 26 January 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Hi all,
Other than Office 2007 is there any software out there that can
On Monday 26 January 2009 23:23:18 Robert Bridge wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Other than Office 2007 is there any software out there that can *write*
.docx?
Work requires me to use this format sometimes (it's not negotiable) and I
can get around it 95% of the time, but the 5% causes me
Am Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:25:33 -0800
schrieb Grant emailgr...@gmail.com:
[...]
Thanks Dale, my stuff is very similar to your's. I don't know why it
isn't finding eth0 and wlan0 (USB wireless). I'll ask on the hardened
list in case it's a hardened issue.
- Grant
This is only a guess, but
Nick Cunningham wrote:
2009/1/26 Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
mailto:paul.hartman%2bgen...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Peter Ruskin
peter.rus...@dsl.pipex.com mailto:peter.rus...@dsl.pipex.com
wrote:
On Monday 26 January 2009, Alan McKinnon
On Monday 26 January 2009 23:38:46 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Peter Ruskin
peter.rus...@dsl.pipex.com wrote:
On Monday 26 January 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Hi all,
Other than Office 2007 is there any software out there that can
*write* .docx?
Work
Marc Joliet wrote:
Am Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:25:33 -0800
schrieb Grant emailgr...@gmail.com:
[...]
Thanks Dale, my stuff is very similar to your's. I don't know why it
isn't finding eth0 and wlan0 (USB wireless). I'll ask on the hardened
list in case it's a hardened issue.
- Grant
Alan McKinnon wrote:
I have a stock standard openoffice-3.0.0 here (not bin) and it claims to write
Office 2003 XML. I believe from colleagues that this is not the same as
2007 .docx and I believe them as my Office 2003 in Crossover cannot
open .docx
I could be wrong though - I don't know
[...]
Thanks Dale, my stuff is very similar to your's. I don't know why it
isn't finding eth0 and wlan0 (USB wireless). I'll ask on the hardened
list in case it's a hardened issue.
- Grant
This is only a guess, but maybe you didn't log out and log back in
again. That is required for
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Nick Cunningham n...@monkeydust.net wrote:
2009/1/26 Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Peter Ruskin
peter.rus...@dsl.pipex.com wrote:
On Monday 26 January 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Hi all,
Other than Office
Thank you Daniel and Dale and everyone for their opinions regarding
this. Adding a list of files tracked by portage to a list of files
specified by me and reporting on the different sounds like a very
useful thing to me. Daniel, can you remember anything else about that
cruft script from an
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 00:16:04 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
I have a stock standard openoffice-3.0.0 here (not bin) and it claims to
write Office 2003 XML. I believe from colleagues that this is not the
same as 2007 .docx and I believe them as my Office 2003 in
Alan McKinnon schrieb am 26.01.2009 21:11:
Hi all,
Other than Office 2007 is there any software out there that can *write* .docx?
Work requires me to use this format sometimes (it's not negotiable) and I can
get around it 95% of the time, but the 5% causes me insane amounts of grief.
Writing an ebuild is best, but sometimes you just want to give a
program a try without writing an ebuild (like everyone else running
Linux does) and a scruft script enables you to do that without making
a mess of your system.
Not to be picky, it's just an idea but in that case, isn't it way
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 00:46:22 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Alan McKinnon schrieb am 26.01.2009 21:11:
Ooo-3 can read these docs but not write them.
OxygenOffice [1] supports importing and exporting Word 2007 (.docx)
files as well as importing Excel 2007 (.xlsx) and PowerPoint 2007 (.pptx).
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:57:13 +0500, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
AFAIK portage won't remove any changed (by hand) files in
CONFIG_PROTECT paths,
Portage won't remove any files in CONFIG_PROTECTed paths,changed ornot.
It also won't remove any files that have been changed since installation,
wherever
Alan McKinnon schrieb am 27.01.2009 00:12:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 00:46:22 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Alan McKinnon schrieb am 26.01.2009 21:11:
Ooo-3 can read these docs but not write them.
OxygenOffice [1] supports importing and exporting Word 2007 (.docx)
files as well as importing
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 24 January 2009 12:11:41 Rod wrote:
I'm getting the following error too much, many packages are no longer
insalling with this problem ;o(
* Running elibtoolize in: libmcrypt-2.5.8
* Applying install-sh-1.5.patch ...
* Portage patch failed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJfoGvrrQY7p0jeDYRApMqAJkBH+2prkcatKo+/Db8dRuzKIp7sQCeLxf6
37ANM88juevX9ilyDaoeRDg=
=hV+E
-END PGP
Robert Pitkin wrote:
unsubscribe
Didn't work did it? Try gentoo-user+unsubscr...@gentoo.org and follow
the instructions it sends you back.
Good luck.
Dale
:-) :-)
On 2009-01-26, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
These are shared documents. I can't just change what they are
based on my own preferences.
I need an app that WRITES .docx. If Office 2007 is the only
one that does it, so be it. But a workaround or another way to
skin this cat is
Or maybe extrem LDFLAGS. We want see your /etc/make.conf )
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Willie Wong wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:43:01AM +0200, Maxim Kremenev wrote:
Maybe u try exec firefox in console and send output ?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at
60 matches
Mail list logo
