Re: [gentoo-user] Failed builds of kbuild and cdrdao with "undefined reference to `__alloca'"

Am Samstag, 10. Februar 2018, 03:39:04 CET schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > > > What's your sys-libs/glibc ?! > > [I] sys-libs/glibc > Installed versions: (2.2)^s(09:54:43 AM 02/04/2018) Heh, guessed so. Welcome to the wonderful world of early testing. It will take some time until the rest of

Re: [gentoo-user] "systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution"

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:02 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10 2018, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> >> Interesting. Does /sbin/reboot exist? > > gottlieb@E6430 ~ $ ls -l /sbin/reboot > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jan 28 13:08 /sbin/reboot -> ../bin/systemctl > >> What does

[gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

Am Sat, 10 Feb 2018 15:06:06 -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Kai Krakow > wrote: >> Am Sat, 10 Feb 2018 19:38:56 + schrieb Wols Lists: >> >>> On 10/02/18 18:56, Kai Krakow wrote: role and /usr takes the role of /, and /home already

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

On 10/02/18 20:06, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: Am Sat, 10 Feb 2018 19:38:56 + schrieb Wols Lists: On 10/02/18 18:56, Kai Krakow wrote: role and /usr takes the role of /, and /home already took the role of /usr (that's why

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution"

On Sun, Feb 11 2018, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 11/02/18 02:16, allan gottlieb wrote: >> I have a question on this news item. >> >> I use systemd (gnome3) on a gentoo stable system. >> eix reports that sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 is installed >> >> But >> euse -I sysv-utils >> reports >>

Re: [gentoo-user] "systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution"

allan gottlieb wrote: > I have a question on this news item. > > I use systemd (gnome3) on a gentoo stable system. > eix reports that sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 is installed > > But >euse -I sysv-utils > reports >no matching entries found > > Is something wrong? > > I do *not* have >

[gentoo-user] "systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution"

I have a question on this news item. I use systemd (gnome3) on a gentoo stable system. eix reports that sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 is installed But euse -I sysv-utils reports no matching entries found Is something wrong? I do *not* have sys-apps/sysvinit, sys-apps/openrc, or

Re: [gentoo-user] "systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution"

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:16 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: > I have a question on this news item. > > I use systemd (gnome3) on a gentoo stable system. > eix reports that sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 is installed > > But >euse -I sysv-utils > reports >no matching entries found >

Re: [gentoo-user] "systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution"

On Sat, Feb 10 2018, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:16 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: >> I have a question on this news item. >> >> I use systemd (gnome3) on a gentoo stable system. >> eix reports that sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 is installed >> >> But >>euse -I

[gentoo-user] Re: "systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution"

On 11/02/18 02:16, allan gottlieb wrote: I have a question on this news item. I use systemd (gnome3) on a gentoo stable system. eix reports that sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 is installed But euse -I sysv-utils reports no matching entries found Is something wrong? I do *not* have

Re: [gentoo-user] DRM error: couldn't read SADs

On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > [drm:dce_v11_0_afmt_setmode] *ERROR* Couldn't read SADs: 0 > [...] > traps: plugin-containe[6833] general protection ip:7f0a2e1711b1 > sp:7fff6f64dc30 error:0 in ld-2.25.so[7f0a2e15c000+23000] > > What is a SAD

[gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

Am Sat, 10 Feb 2018 21:20:16 + schrieb Wol's lists: > On 10/02/18 20:06, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Kai Krakow >> wrote: >>> Am Sat, 10 Feb 2018 19:38:56 + schrieb Wols Lists: >>> On 10/02/18 18:56, Kai Krakow wrote: > role and

[gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

Am Thu, 08 Feb 2018 19:11:48 +0200 schrieb gevisz: > I never used tmpfs for portage TMPDIR before and now decided to give it > a try. > > I have 8GB of RAM and 12GB of swap on a separate partition. > > Do I correctly understood > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Portage_TMPDIR_on_tmpfs that I can

[gentoo-user] DRM error: couldn't read SADs

Hello list, My VGA card is: # lspci | grep VGA 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Ellesmere [Radeon Pro WX 5100] I've been getting these entries in dmesg every time I boot the machine, ever since I installed the card some months ago:

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub2 boot problem

2018-02-07 18:50 GMT+01:00 Steven Lembark : > On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 22:00:39 +0100 > Magnus Johansson wrote: > > From my grub.cfg: > > insmod gzio > insmod part_msdos > insmod diskfilter > insmod mdraid1x > insmod raid5rec > insmod lvm >

[gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

Am Thu, 08 Feb 2018 16:42:23 -0700 schrieb Grant Taylor: > On 02/08/2018 03:32 PM, gevisz wrote: >> In this case it would be nice to hear a reason. > > I think the reason probably goes back a number of years. When /tmp was > made volatile (ram / swap backed) there was a need for non-volatile

[gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

Am Thu, 08 Feb 2018 14:50:31 -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Dale wrote: >> As someone else pointed out, if you start using swap, that generally >> defeats the purpose of tmpfs. >> >> > I'll just add one thing to this, which I've probably

[gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

Am Fri, 09 Feb 2018 10:58:35 + schrieb Neil Bothwick: > On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 10:12:01 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > >> > Why mess around with another tmpfs? Just set PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/tmp" in >> > make.conf. Job done! >> >> Acting on the advice of various Gentoo guides, I have this: >> >> #

[gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

Am Fri, 09 Feb 2018 12:30:21 +0200 schrieb gevisz: > 2018-02-09 10:11 GMT+02:00 Neil Bothwick : >> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 23:18:19 +, Wol's lists wrote: >> >>> > More specifically, /var/tmp is traditionally supposed to be >>> > non-volatile (across reboots). >>> > >>> >

[gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

Am Thu, 08 Feb 2018 19:02:10 -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Wol's lists > wrote: >> >> /var/tmp is defined as the place where programs store stuff like crash >> recovery files. Mounting it tmpfs is going to screw up any programs >> that

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

On 10/02/18 18:56, Kai Krakow wrote: > role and /usr takes the role of /, and /home already took the role of /usr > (that's why it's called /usr, it was user data in early unix). The Actually no, not at all. /usr is not short for USeR, it's an acronym for User System Resources, which is why it

[gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

Am Sat, 10 Feb 2018 19:38:56 + schrieb Wols Lists: > On 10/02/18 18:56, Kai Krakow wrote: >> role and /usr takes the role of /, and /home already took the role of >> /usr (that's why it's called /usr, it was user data in early unix). The > > Actually no, not at all. /usr is not short for

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Sat, 10 Feb 2018 19:38:56 + schrieb Wols Lists: > >> On 10/02/18 18:56, Kai Krakow wrote: >>> role and /usr takes the role of /, and /home already took the role of >>> /usr (that's why it's called /usr, it was user