Re: [gentoo-user] slot conflict for media-libs/x264-0.0

2018-06-18 Thread allan gottlieb
On Mon, Jun 18 2018, Mick wrote: > Hi Allan, > > On Monday, 18 June 2018 18:52:31 BST allan gottlieb wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 17 2018, Mick wrote: >> > On Sunday, 17 June 2018 22:04:50 BST allan gottlieb wrote: >> >> (I have been offline for a few months and apologize if this has been >> >>

[gentoo-user] syslog-ng stopped showing kernel messages

2018-06-18 Thread Grant Edwards
For some reason, syslog-ng recently stopped showing kernel messages. I can't figure out why. I don't rememver ever having klogd running, nor did I ever touch the default syslog-ng config file. I tried adding file("/proc/kmsg") to the syslog-ngl.conf file's src() statement: source src {

Re: [gentoo-user] slot conflict for media-libs/x264-0.0

2018-06-18 Thread allan gottlieb
On Sun, Jun 17 2018, Mick wrote: > On Sunday, 17 June 2018 22:04:50 BST allan gottlieb wrote: >> (I have been offline for a few months and apologize if this has been >> covered.) >> >> I had not synced for about 3 months (fear of new, incompatible gnucash) >> but have now done so.

Re: [gentoo-user] slot conflict for media-libs/x264-0.0

2018-06-18 Thread Mick
Hi Allan, On Monday, 18 June 2018 18:52:31 BST allan gottlieb wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17 2018, Mick wrote: > > On Sunday, 17 June 2018 22:04:50 BST allan gottlieb wrote: > >> (I have been offline for a few months and apologize if this has been > >> covered.) > >> > >> I had not synced for about 3

[gentoo-user] Re: syslog-ng stopped showing kernel messages

2018-06-18 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-06-18, Grant Edwards wrote: > For some reason, syslog-ng recently stopped showing kernel messages. > I can't figure out why. I don't rememver ever having klogd running, > nor did I ever touch the default syslog-ng config file. This appears to be a problem with the 4.18-rc1 kernel

Re: [gentoo-user] slot conflict for media-libs/x264-0.0

2018-06-18 Thread Mick
On Monday, 18 June 2018 21:28:38 BST allan gottlieb wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18 2018, Mick wrote: > > Hi Allan, > > > > On Monday, 18 June 2018 18:52:31 BST allan gottlieb wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 17 2018, Mick wrote: > >> > On Sunday, 17 June 2018 22:04:50 BST allan gottlieb wrote: > >> >> (I have

Re: [gentoo-user] Enable "regular" network traffic when using VPN

2018-06-18 Thread Mick
Hi Grant, On Monday, 18 June 2018 03:59:32 BST Grant Taylor wrote: > On 06/17/2018 03:05 PM, Mick wrote: > > TBH I wouldn't select "Use only for resources on this connection", > > I thought "Use only for resources on this connection" would enable (what > I know as) "split horizon", which is what

Re: [gentoo-user] Enable "regular" network traffic when using VPN

2018-06-18 Thread Grant Taylor
On 06/18/2018 04:30 AM, Mick wrote: Hi Grant, Hi Mick, I am not overly familiar with networkmanager and the OP has not shared any screenshots or tab-by-tab NM settings, but had a look on a Gnome desktop and when hovering over the "Use only for resources on this connection" setting in the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: default CONFIG_PROTECT behavior

2018-06-18 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:27 AM Neil Bothwick wrote: > > There are other config managers that handle this differently, if you > don't like etc-update try another. I tried a few some years ago and > settled on conf-update, others swear by cfg-update. Since nobody else is shilling it, I will. I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: default CONFIG_PROTECT behavior

2018-06-18 Thread Daniel Frey
On 06/17/18 15:38, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I don't have any of those problems. I still use etc-update, and if there are > complex updates I edit the original file myself, using the diff as a guide. > > I never did get to grips with the more "modern" ways of doing it. > Same here, I tried

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: default CONFIG_PROTECT behavior

2018-06-18 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 17 Jun 2018 19:35:05 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > The problem (or multiple problems) here is that it doesn't say what is > being merged into what (no, its not symmetric), and to compound that it > doesn't just leave this file alone and quit or go on to the next file; > it shows some diff

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: default CONFIG_PROTECT behavior

2018-06-18 Thread Mick
On Monday, 18 June 2018 03:35:05 BST Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-06-17 18:12, Mick wrote: > > From the fine manual: > > z Zap (delete) the new config file and continue. > > So what do you do if the merge of this file is too hard and you want to > do it another time? The answer seems to