Am Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2018, 18:03:35 CET schrieb Arve Barsnes:
[...]
> More important than that, it seems the vulnerability is in
> ghostscript, and the vulnerable versions are not any longer even in
> portage, so shouldn't the change have been reverted by now?
Am Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2018, 16:46:39 CET schrieb Philip Webb:
> 181209 Marc Joliet wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2018, 11:35:16 CET schrieb Philip Webb:
> >> What exactly are the "security reasons" ?
> >> Do they apply to a single-user system ? -- if not,
> >> why is the restrictive version
Am Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2018, 11:35:16 CET schrieb Philip Webb:
> 181208 Marc Joliet wrote:
> > This is mentioned in the emerge output when installing imagemagick.
> >
> > From the 7.0.8.14 ebuild :
> > elog "For security reasons, a policy.xml file was installed in
> > /etc/ImageMagick-7"
> >
On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 at 16:46, Philip Webb wrote:
>
> 181209 Marc Joliet wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2018, 11:35:16 CET schrieb Philip Webb:
> >> What exactly are the "security reasons" ?
> >> Do they apply to a single-user system ? -- if not,
> >> why is the restrictive version of the
On December 9, 2018 6:23:07 PM UTC, "taii...@gmx.com" wrote:
>On 12/07/2018 06:47 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 07/12/2018 09:30, Dale wrote:
>>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
If you want to see all of the installed packages that are affected,
you need to set CPU_FLAGS_X86 to an empty
On 12/5/18 1:34 PM, james wrote:
Hello Dan:: lots of good suggestions. you can look in
/usr/portage/x11/wm (or whereevery /etc/portage/x11-wm for a listing of
what in the tree for smaller.
I have been wanting to try lumina::
https://lumina-desktop.org/features/
"does not require PolicyKit,
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 12/06/2018 02:27 AM, Dale wrote:
>> From what I've read, I can use pvmove and pvremove to replace that
>> drive. Just tell pv to move the data and when done, remove the old
>> drive. After that, the new 6TB drive will be used in that PV and the
>> 3TB drive can be used for
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On December 9, 2018 6:23:07 PM UTC, "taii...@gmx.com"
> wrote:
>
> On 12/07/2018 06:47 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
> On 07/12/2018 09:30, Dale wrote:
>
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
> If you want to see all of the installed packages
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 12/9/18 3:45 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Grant,
>
> Hi Dale,
>
>> I'm not ignoring this email.
>
> I didn't presume you were. ;-)
>
>> I just keep rereading it. ;-)
>
> Okay.
>
> Is there an aspect of it that doesn't make sense? Or that you're
> uncomfortable with? Can I help
On 12/9/18 7:38 PM, Dale wrote:
Just making sense of it. Trying to get it firmly in my mind. It just
seems to simple and easy to move that much data around and swap drives
even while in use. o-O
Welcome to the wonders of LVM.
You turn a drive / partition into something that LVM can use.
On 12/9/18 4:46 PM, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
Hi,
As some may know, I'm making some changes and upgrades to my puter.
One thing I'm considering, encryption of a select directory/mount
point/file system.
Please elaborate on a hypothetical setup that you would like.
It might be worth starting
On 12/9/18 3:45 PM, Dale wrote:
Grant,
Hi Dale,
I'm not ignoring this email.
I didn't presume you were. ;-)
I just keep rereading it. ;-)
Okay.
Is there an aspect of it that doesn't make sense? Or that you're
uncomfortable with? Can I help alleviate the worry?
I'm uncertain
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 12/9/18 4:46 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>
> Hi,
>
>> As some may know, I'm making some changes and upgrades to my puter.
>> One thing I'm considering, encryption of a select directory/mount
>> point/file system.
>
> Please elaborate on a hypothetical setup that you would
On 12/9/18 10:15 PM, Dale wrote:
Well, I don't really think I need to encrypt the entire /home mount
point. To me, that would be overkill. Of course, that may be easier.
I would like to have certain directories that I can store things in that
is encrypted. For example, I have some financial
On Monday, December 10, 2018 12:46:07 AM CET Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> As some may know, I'm making some changes and upgrades to my puter. One
> thing I'm considering, encryption of a select directory/mount point/file
> system. One thought I have, create a mount point named say "Encrypted"
> and
Howdy,
As some may know, I'm making some changes and upgrades to my puter. One
thing I'm considering, encryption of a select directory/mount point/file
system. One thought I have, create a mount point named say "Encrypted"
and put anything I don't want widely seen or hacked in that directory.
181208 Marc Joliet wrote:
> This is mentioned in the emerge output when installing imagemagick.
> From the 7.0.8.14 ebuild :
> elog "For security reasons, a policy.xml file was installed in
> /etc/ImageMagick-7"
> elog "which will prevent the usage of the following coders by default:"
>
181209 Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2018, 11:35:16 CET schrieb Philip Webb:
>> What exactly are the "security reasons" ?
>> Do they apply to a single-user system ? -- if not,
>> why is the restrictive version of the policy file installed by default
>> rather than a warning at the
On 12/07/2018 06:47 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 07/12/2018 09:30, Dale wrote:
>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> If you want to see all of the installed packages that are affected,
>>> you need to set CPU_FLAGS_X86 to an empty string:
>>>
>>> CPU_FLAGS_X86=""
>>>
>>> and then do "emerge
19 matches
Mail list logo
