[gentoo-user] Re: Horribly off-topic linux distro question...

2008-02-07 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Jan Seeger wrote: snip insane security paranoia insane? What's insane: Presuming the windows host is compromised? or having your computer on a USB flash drive? or using two browsers to confirm the integrity of a site? The procedure is quite easy, once you've done it once or twice. But go

[gentoo-user] Re: Horribly off-topic linux distro question...

2008-02-07 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Steve wrote: In the context of online banking, where Windows of some flavour is the desktop OS, I see a substantial risk arising through spyware and/or viruses. I suspect that a neat way to mitigate this would be to run an OS from a CD which offers nothing more fancy than a basic web-browser.

[gentoo-user] Re: Horribly off-topic linux distro question...

2008-02-08 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: Hi, On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:05:00 -0500 7v5w7go9ub0o [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - The SSL connection is established within the Linux VM, so all the host sees is an encrypted connection to your bank. Wrong: It will also see all the virtual memory the virtualized machine

[gentoo-user] Re: SSH brute force attacks and blacklist.py

2008-02-27 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Steve wrote: I can't believe that I'm the only person with this, so it's probably worth asking. I'm one of the (many) people who has opportunists trying usernames and passwords against SSH... while every effort has been made to secure this service by configuration; strong passwords; no root

[gentoo-user] Re: SSH brute force attacks and blacklist.py

2008-02-27 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Sorry here's the link I should have posted: http://www.cipherdyne.org/fwknop/ -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Nvidia GeForce Go 6800 and nvidia-drivers == Cannot switch to ttys or close X

2008-03-13 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Enrico Weigelt wrote: You're talking about the NV's secret-code driver ? It makes heavy trouble with fbdev. Both together monst likely won't work. That's because they refuse to use the well approved DRI interface and do something completely own and obfuscated. Nobody outside of NV can

[gentoo-user] Re: Boot Gentoo to clean windows

2008-03-26 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Mikie wrote: Does anyone know of a product (hopefully free) that can clean a Windows PC while booted on Gentoo? I guess I need a good malware tool that runs on Linux and cleans NTFS volumes. Thanks. FWIW, AntiVir, Bitdefender, and F-Prot run quite well on Linux, and each has BOTH Linux and

[gentoo-user] Re: Boot Gentoo to clean windows

2008-03-27 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Florian Philipp wrote: snip FWIW, AntiVir, Bitdefender, and F-Prot run quite well on Linux, and each has BOTH Linux and Windows Trojan and virus signatures. So you can install these and scan your windows box, and then scan your Linux box/downloads for malware (e.g. openoffice files, media

[gentoo-user] Re: Boot Gentoo to clean windows

2008-03-28 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Mick wrote: On 28/03/2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anti-Virus on Linux. No. (presuming that you don't run as root, and have lots of unprivileged users for individual applications.) Anti-Malware on Linux. Yes. (Malware gets to the box via spoofed or hacked software

[gentoo-user] Re: Boot Gentoo to clean windows

2008-03-28 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Stroller wrote: snip important, informative stuff Be aware that sometimes Windows isn't cleanly fixable. Although I try to avoid it until I've exhausted avenues for a clean repair, sometimes the best thing to do is simply to back-up reinstall. Think this is a great write up. The last

[gentoo-user] Re: local caching DNS?

2008-04-09 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Ralf Stephan wrote: Hello, I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend? consider maradns http://www.maradns.org/changelog.html - It is a

[gentoo-user] Re: local caching DNS?

2008-04-09 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Uwe Thiem wrote: On Wednesday 09 April 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: Ralf Stephan wrote: Hello, I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend

[gentoo-user] Rootkit Hunter release 1.3.2

2008-04-26 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
(Portage is a little dated at 1.2.9) http://sourceforge.net/projects/rkhunter/ -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] chkrootkit release 0.48

2008-04-26 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
http://www.chkrootkit.org/#new -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Rootkit Hunter release 1.3.2

2008-04-26 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Florian Philipp wrote: On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 14:38 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: (Portage is a little dated at 1.2.9) http://sourceforge.net/projects/rkhunter/ Thanks for the info but this doesn't belong here. The proper thing to do would be to open a bug on http://bugs.gentoo.org and request

[gentoo-user] Re: Rootkit Hunter release 1.3.2

2008-04-26 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Florian Philipp wrote: On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 18:46 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: Florian Philipp wrote: On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 14:38 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: (Portage is a little dated at 1.2.9) http://sourceforge.net/projects/rkhunter/ Thanks for the info but this doesn't belong here

[gentoo-user] Updated ebuild; bypassing manifest check

2008-05-01 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Following the instructions here, I tried to create an updated ebuild for mozilla-thunderbird-bin. The newest version is 2.0.0.14; current ebuild is 2.0.0.12. http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Create_an_Updated_Ebuild Everything worked fine until I tried to update the hashes in the manifest,

[gentoo-user] Re: Updated ebuild; bypassing manifest check

2008-05-02 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Friday 02 May 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: Following the instructions here, I tried to create an updated ebuild for mozilla-thunderbird-bin. The newest version is 2.0.0.14; current ebuild is 2.0.0.12. http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Create_an_Updated_Ebuild Everything worked

[gentoo-user] Fun with Foo (matic) ?

2008-05-09 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
My printer stopped working yesterday (no ppds?), so I upgraded CUPS and hplip to the latest masked versions and everything worked fine. Today did an emerge -puDv world, and got this: [ebuild UD] net-print/foomatic-db-ppds-3.0.20060720 [20060720] 12,056 kB Any help would be appreciated

[gentoo-user] Re: Fun with Foo (matic) ?

2008-05-09 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: My printer stopped working yesterday (no ppds?), so I upgraded CUPS and hplip to the latest masked versions and everything worked fine. Today did an emerge -puDv world, and got this: [ebuild UD] net-print/foomatic-db-ppds-3.0.20060720 [20060720] 12,056 kB Any help

[gentoo-user] Re: Fun with Foo (matic) ?

2008-05-09 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Friday 09 May 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: My printer stopped working yesterday (no ppds?), so I upgraded CUPS and hplip to the latest masked versions and everything worked fine. Today did an emerge -puDv world, and got this: [ebuild UD] net-print/foomatic-db-ppds

[gentoo-user] Re: Best anti-virus

2008-05-09 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Tony Caudel wrote: I am currently using the clamv anti-virus program. I was wondering if there is a better one for Gentoo, especially one that integrates well with Thunderbird. That has been my one disappointment with clamav. Not necessarily clamav's fault since T/B maintains its emails in

[gentoo-user] Re: Best anti-virus

2008-05-10 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
forgottenwizard wrote: On 20:13 Fri 09 May , 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: I am extremely pleased with Antivir (aka Avira) and its realtime LKM, Dazuko! 1. The Antivir database and heuristics contain dozens of Linux-specific rootkits and Trojans. These in addition to Windows sigs. FWICT, the only

[gentoo-user] Re: Best anti-virus

2008-05-10 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Saturday 10 May 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: But I sure acknowledge the majority opinion - almost ALL Linux users, and many Windows users as well, choose not to run real-time AntiMalware scanners. I do this, and I do it for a perfectly obvious reason: Your suggestion

[gentoo-user] Re: Fun with Foo (matic) ?

2008-05-11 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Mick wrote: On Friday 09 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Friday 09 May 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: See other thread on this very subject yesterday and today for details: emerge -avC all foomatic ebuilds emerge -av  all foomatic ebuilds Yes; that worked. Thank you very much for patiently

[gentoo-user] recent updates (stunnel, vidalia, nmap, filezilla, rkhunter, ckrootkit)

2008-06-01 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
I'm maintaining these directly from the authors' sites. This is an FYI for others who are doing the same. stunnel: 4.24 Vidalia: 0.1.3 nmap: 4.6.5 filezilla: 3.0.10 rkhunter: 1.3.2 chkrootkit: 0.48 HTH -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Loop-AES versus DM-Crypt versus ???

2008-06-27 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Sebastian Wiesner wrote: 7v5w7go9ub0o [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Friday 27 June 2008, 05:41:15 Chris Walters wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sorry if this subject has been hashed and rehashed again, but I was wondering which Gentoo partition encryption scheme is considered

[gentoo-user] Re: Firefox 3 stability

2008-07-02 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Adam Carter wrote: I'm finding it unusable as it crashes often. How are you guys finding it? I find the -bin version is stable, and works well with embedded flash (e.g. youtube). (I find the new Opera is more stable, and when loaded without the mail programs (Opera -nomail -nolirc ) it

[Fwd: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules]

2007-12-14 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Volunteer to pick up part of the load, I guess - something that I, as a newbie, am reluctant to do - but I guess I will if filezilla continues to languish. There is indeed an issue; e.g. TOR, a popular desktop package, is a release behind; Vidalia, is two releases behind - one a security

Re: [Fwd: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules]

2007-12-14 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Randy Barlow wrote: 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: OTOH, the good news is that a newbie like me can install an outdated package (e.g. Vidalia); resolve dependencies; uninstall the portage version; download and compile the current version from the developer. If you know how to do those things, learning

[gentoo-user] hal requires cryptsetup!? will hal work with loop-aes?

2009-04-05 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
BACKGROUND: Am preparing for the xorg update, and hal wants to bring in cryptsetup: ('ebuild', '/', 'sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.0.5-r1', 'merge') pulled in by =sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.0.5 required by ('ebuild', '/', 'sys-apps/hal-0.5.11-r8', 'merge') A quick look at the ebuild reveals this:

[gentoo-user] Re: hal requires cryptsetup!? will hal work with loop-aes?

2009-04-06 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
ABCD wrote: I'm not sure if you will need sys-fs/cryptsetup for your setup, but I think you may have gotten confused over the difference between USE and IUSE. IUSE is a variable set by an ebuild to tell portage (or your PM of choice) that this package supports certain USE flags. See

[gentoo-user] Re: New xorg.conf with x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5

2009-04-08 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 07 April 2009 13:02:28 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: [...] but my real problem is that hal crap. In their fight to make x 'easier' they make it harder. keyboard layout is incorrect?

[gentoo-user] jagged, grey, fine, horizontal lines on xterm border

2009-04-08 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Just upgraded to xorg-server-1.5.3-r5, and now I see some sort of pattern on the edge of my xterms; reminiscent of the gray background of basic xwindows. I seem to recall seeing this years ago, and having to modify a configuration somewhere (e.g. with solid or black or ??). Can't remember if it

[gentoo-user] Re: jagged, grey, fine, horizontal lines on xterm border

2009-04-08 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wednesday 08 April 2009 20:35:24 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: Just upgraded to xorg-server-1.5.3-r5, and now I see some sort of pattern on the edge of my xterms; reminiscent of the gray background of basic xwindows. I seem to recall seeing this years ago, and having to modify

[gentoo-user] Re: jagged, grey, fine, horizontal lines on xterm border

2009-04-08 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Paul Hartman wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:35 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o 7v5w7go9u...@gmail.com wrote: Just upgraded to xorg-server-1.5.3-r5, and now I see some sort of pattern on the edge of my xterms; reminiscent of the gray background of basic xwindows. I seem to recall seeing this years ago

[gentoo-user] Re: jagged, grey, fine, horizontal lines on xterm border

2009-04-08 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Paul Hartman wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:33 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o 7v5w7go9u...@gmail.com wrote: Paul Hartman wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:35 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o 7v5w7go9u...@gmail.com wrote: Just upgraded to xorg-server-1.5.3-r5, and now I see some sort of pattern on the edge of my xterms

[gentoo-user] Re: jagged, grey, fine, horizontal lines on xterm border

2009-04-09 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Thursday 09 April 2009 03:22:23 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: something similar on my system. That's it. It is the same gray hash that appears as the background if you were to start X using xorgcfg to self generate an xorg-config. It's obviously something one can learn

[gentoo-user] Re: jagged, grey, fine, horizontal lines on xterm border

2009-04-09 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Paul Hartman wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:07 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o 7v5w7go9u...@gmail.com wrote: So I figured that I should take a snapshot of the old xterm and post it next to yesterday's posting and allow folks an a:b comparison. But YIKES - when I looked at the photo on the updated box, I

[gentoo-user] Re: jagged, grey, fine, horizontal lines on xterm border

2009-04-10 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Paul Hartman wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:43 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o 7v5w7go9u...@gmail.com wrote: snip But the question is, why do I (and you) see jaggedness when looking at that jpeg? I can ignore it, and likely it'll be fine (no jaggedness when looking at that particular pattern) the next

[gentoo-user] Re: I don't like xorg-server 1.5.3

2009-04-13 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Dale wrote: Mark Knecht wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Justin wrote: Peter Ruskin schrieb: Well, I did the upgrade at last, with -hal and my proven xorg-config, and the result is unusable. I use kde-3.5.9 and the mouse doesn't work right -

[gentoo-user] Re: KDE 4.2.1 : goodbye good riddance

2009-04-18 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Jorge Morais wrote: On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:56:20 -0700 Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: While not a KDE user I echo your thoughts. I'm personally a bit worried about Gentoo overlords sort of pushing this hald thing with reasons like 'Gnome's automounting depends on it'. Where have

[gentoo-user] Re: NVidia setup instructions?

2009-05-06 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Dienstag 05 Mai 2009, Mark Knecht wrote: On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: On Dienstag 05 Mai 2009, Mark Knecht wrote: SNIP Thanks Brandon. I'm up in X now on the 6200 AGP so it's functional. glxgears seems

[gentoo-user] Re: f-secure linux security 7.03 on gentoo?

2009-06-04 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Jarry wrote: Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: at a customers site they have some company-license for f-secure-products. I run a mail-gateway there, using gentoo, it runs amavisd which utilizes clamav and fsav ... (the customer *wants* me to use both as he pays for the f-secure-licenses ...) What

[gentoo-user] Re: DNS poisoning fix

2008-07-09 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Mick wrote: Hi All, Have you seen this? http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080709/ttc-us-it-internet-software-crime-e0bba4a.html and this? http://www.doxpara.com/ Is it merely a matter of using the right version of bind (for those who run a bind daemon locally), or does it go further than

[gentoo-user] arpstar (arp spoofing protection) work arounds?

2008-07-20 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Arpstar was out of commission as of kernel 2.6.24.x Two separate, weeks old gento bugzilla reports describing the specifics have not yet even been acknowledged. Given the importance of this program at hotspots, I'm guessing that laptop users are downloading and installing directly (as, for

[gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo on Centrino 2 -- Have to wait?

2008-09-05 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Jan Seeger wrote: Hey list, I have just received my new notebook, a Dell Latitude E6400. Of course, I now want to install linux on it. The problem is that the Gentoo minimal install cd recognizes neither the ethernet nor the wireless cards. Is the network card in this laptop (an Intel

[gentoo-user] Re: Compiling for an unbooted kernel

2008-10-09 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-10-09 20:23]: Am Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2008 19:48:37 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is it possible -- and how -- to compile/install this interface for the new kernel while the old one is still running?

[gentoo-user] boot messages; vga; vesa; HDTV monitor

2008-11-29 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
A few years back I installed gentoo and everything worked fine, except that the OS bootup messages were too big, and scrolled by too fast. Somewhere I found a tweak (IIRC, it involved recompiling the kernel) that handled it fine - i.e. the font was reduced dramatically after the bios was

[gentoo-user] Re: boot messages; vga; vesa; HDTV monitor

2008-11-30 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Saturday 29 November 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: 1. Anyone aware of a wiki or other gentoo help that describes how to change the boot message size during boot? yes, it is. In /usr/src/Documentation. Thanks for the reply. Wasn't able to find any reference here

[gentoo-user] Re: revdep-rebuild question

2007-02-19 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Alan, Seems reasonable. Would I (Could I?) then do an equery depends on each binary and assuming nothing depends on it remove them by hand without causing damage? I'd want to do another revdep-rebuild every so often to ensure that things remained consistent. Makes sense to me - doing

[gentoo-user] Re: ipw2200 + Intel Pro Wireless 2915 a/b/g: ipw2200: Firmware error detected. Restarting.

2006-10-29 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Hope that you get a more useful response FWIW, I Had precisely these symptoms on my Sony 2200 laptop - and can't tell you why - but it is rock sold now. I think there were two things going on: 1. This might be a kill switch? Some of my problems were certainly due to the kill switch. I

[gentoo-user] Re: udev upgrade and non-working eth0

2006-11-27 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
FWIW, I also upgraded and find that my laptop, which previously had eth0 and eth1 for its two cards (one wired and one wireless) now has eth0 and eth2. After editing my scripts and configurations (e.g. wpa_supplicant startup and kismet conf), things seem to work fine. HTH, newbie --

[gentoo-user] Re: browser advice

2006-11-29 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Another vote for Opera here. I'm running 9.02 at home. A few observations from my set-up, although they could be as much to do me having not got something else in my configuration right ... And another strong Opera vote here :-) 1) This version of Opera really seems to struggle with heavy

[gentoo-user] Re: linux-headers vs gentoo-sources

2006-12-07 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
This show the disadvantage of aggressively cleaning $DISTDIR. You have already downloaded this file once, when you installed 2.6.17-r1 (or even earlier when you first installed a 2.6.17 kernel). Patch level updates use the same source files, so cleaning out tarballs for installed packages

[gentoo-user] DieHard ? ( hardens against memory errors)

2007-01-01 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Anyone using this on a hardened box (e.g. to augment a precompiled, non-ssp binary, such as OOffice)? http://www.diehard-software.org/ (Emery Berger, UMass) DieHard completely prevents particular memory management errors from having any effect (these are double frees and invalid frees). It

[gentoo-user] Re: Which Laptop is recommended for Gentoo GNU/Linux?

2007-01-06 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:49:48 -0500, »Q« [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: qfpvajdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm interessted to buy a laptop on which I would like to install Gentoo GNU/Linux by using 100% all hardware functions of the laptop for which I have bought. I've just installed Gentoo on a

[gentoo-user] Re: Best printer to use with Gentoo.

2007-01-24 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:33:39 -0500, Carl Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've had no success getting my HP PSC 1610 Inkjet/Scanner connected to CUPS under Gentoo. Of course, there's no such thing as a best printer, but do any subscribers have recommendations for printers they've found easy to

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Adding Gentoo to Win-XP/NTSF machine

2006-08-27 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
No, it does work. I hgave one machine with Fedora's grub in the MBR. One choice it had was to jump to grub in a partition so you got a second set of boot options based on what hot-plug drive was installed. It worked fine. I did my first test of trying to use the NTLDR. It did attempt to

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Adding Gentoo to Win-XP/NTSF machine

2006-08-27 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:56:12 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, it does work. I hgave one machine with Fedora's grub in the MBR. One choice it had was to jump to grub in a partition so you got a second set of boot options based on what hot-plug drive was installed

[gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: Gcc4.1.1 with hardened

2006-09-07 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 05:47:36 -0400, Ed W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi You can try: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=254119 Thanks for the thought. My issue was more with whether gcc4.1.1 was supported with hardened than the implications of changing the compiler Ed W --

[gentoo-user] Downgrading glibc

2006-09-14 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
I went through the gcc upgrade and discovered that ssp no longer works (suppose it was documented somewhere - but I missed it) So I'm trying to reverse the upgrade process (this time using using a hardened profile) and glibc won't allow me to downgrade. How do I get around this, please?

[gentoo-user] Re: Gcc 4.3.4 --- 4.4.1

2009-08-15 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 08/15/2009 03:33 AM, fe...@crowfix.com wrote: [...] This being 4.3.4 to 4.1.1 looks like a major version change according to the upgrade guide. It doesn't mention what a switch manual takes, but it does list a whole series of steps such as remerging system and

[gentoo-user] Re: Gcc 4.3.4 --- 4.4.1

2009-08-15 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: AFAIK, the mudflap pointer checker is just a command line GCC switch. You need to enable it explicitly using -fmudflap. ah o.k. I'm using the hardened overlay, and mudflap is a use flag defaulting to enabled. I'll post that second comment over in hardened.

[gentoo-user] Re: Supercookies

2009-08-20 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Andrew Lewman wrote: On 08/20/2009 10:09 AM, Ted Smith wrote: You don't lose most functionality by using free software. Not picking on Ted, but this whole thread is off-topic. Arguably, this is very much on-topic. We all know to disable active content when trying to maximize/optimize

[gentoo-user] Re: Does mplayer use it's own internal ffmpeg on Gentoo?

2009-08-20 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: [] I rolled my own and it works very nicely :) If anyone is interested, I submitted a version-bump bug with all needed files: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282154 This worked fine on my core I7 (hardened) box. Thank You

[gentoo-user] Re: flip video on gentoo

2009-08-22 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Allan Gottlieb wrote: I have received a flip video, ultra series (records 60 minutes) digital camcorder for a present. This works fine on windows, but I would naturally much prefer to use gentoo. The windows software can presumably do a bunch of stuff but I would be very happy to simply

[gentoo-user] significant Mplayer multi-thread (multi-core) changes

2009-08-25 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Those using Nikos Chantziaras's fix to mplayer may wish to see his newest offering. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282154

[gentoo-user] Re: pidgin 2.6.1 and video

2009-08-26 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Paul Hartman wrote: FYI if anyone wants to try audio and video chat on the new pidgin 2.6.1 release, it didn't work for me (UVC webcam) until I emerged these packages: pidgin-2.6.1 (with gstreamer USE flag enabled) gst-plugins-v4l2 gst-plugins-farsight gnome-media The last item was

[gentoo-user] Re: How to play quicktime (*.mov) videos with firefox

2009-08-30 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Harry Putnam wrote: I'm having a heck of a time getting firefox setup so it can handle quicktime videos. FWIW, out of security considerations I run FF in a chroot jail with as little other stuff in the jail as possible So using an extension called unplug

[gentoo-user] Re: How to play quicktime (*.mov) videos with firefox

2009-08-31 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 08/30/2009 10:59 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: 64bit Linux, AFAICT, does not yet play .mov files They play fine here. Are you able to drag a link from this page: http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/district9/ and play it on mplayer? TIA!

[gentoo-user] Re: How to play quicktime (*.mov) videos with firefox

2009-09-02 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/01/2009 03:00 AM, Stroller wrote: On 31 Aug 2009, at 18:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 08/31/2009 05:00 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 08/30/2009 10:59 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: 64bit Linux, AFAICT, does not yet play .mov files

[gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo Virtualization

2009-09-06 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
walt wrote: [] I don't use vmware but I do use virtualbox every day and I love it. It's extremely fast even compared to kvm, which I also use on my newest machine with hardware virtualization support. Some questions, please: 1. How would you contrast these two packages for security use?

[gentoo-user] *WARNING* updating Xorg

2009-10-02 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
1. FYI, There is a short, direct upgrade guide that should be referenced before upgrading to 1.6: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.6-upgrade-guide.xml It refers to another, short upgrade guide that should definitely be reviewed before proceeding:

[gentoo-user] Re: *WARNING* updating Xorg

2009-10-03 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
daid kahl wrote: 2. The second guide uses a lot of one-shot emerges; could anyone please explain why I'd use a one-shot? ISTM that if a package is on my system, I'd want it routinely updated. If I need it only once, then instruct me to unmerge it after it's done!? The basic idea of --oneshot

[gentoo-user] Mplayer multi-thread/multi-core ( FFmpeg-mt branch) upgrade

2009-10-30 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Speed up the playback of 1080 H.264 files in MPlayer, on multi-core cpus. Thank You, Nikos Chantziaras http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282154

[gentoo-user] Re: Gtk+ update results in slow Firefox

2009-11-03 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 10/30/2009 10:06 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 10/30/2009 09:39 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Freitag 30 Oktober 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: do you have a bigger page with more scrolling showing the problem? because it seems to be fine here.

[gentoo-user] Re: Gtk+ update results in slow Firefox

2009-11-05 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Peter Humphrey wrote: On Wednesday 04 November 2009 02:55:55 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: NVidia updated their drivers at about the time you started having problems. Their latest driver update changed the permissions on /dev/nvidia0 nvidiactl ; resulting in VERY slow scrolling response on my box

[gentoo-user] Mmplayer-1.0_rc4_p20091113 (standard or multi-thread/multi-core support)

2009-11-13 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282154 (This is the FFmpeg-mt branch which incorporates the mplayer-supported FFmpeg-mt, which speeds up the playback of 1080 H.264 files on multi-core cpus.) mplayer-1.0_rc4_p20091113.ebuild 115 new ffmpeg-mt commits since the last ebuild and latest

[gentoo-user] Re: Sound card is only usable by one application at a time

2009-12-07 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: You *might* want to look into OSS4 if your card is supported by it :P It will require a rebuild of many packages though (oss -alsa in make.conf) and it requires using non-portage packages from an overlay and rebuilding your kernel with sound support completely

[gentoo-user] Ping ElseCZ (re: Nvidia WAIT; (also KVM GPM passthrough ))

2010-02-23 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
I tried to respond to your NVidia forums post; but couldn't join the forum (apparently they didn't like my gmail address). - FWIW I get that wait (WAIT (E, 0, 0x0887d, 0) ) when I activate the following kernel options: # set Bus options (PCI etc.) - Support for DMA Remapping Devices to * #

[gentoo-user] Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-01 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
(this is a rather obvious fix...) eselect news has a new notice, advising of the pending change of the presumed location of the layman directory from /usr/local/portage/layman to /var/lib/layman. It offers three ways to deal with this location change. I chose alternative A. (actually moving the

[gentoo-user] Re: Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-01 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 03/01/10 13:30, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2010-03-01 1:08 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: So layman users choosing alternative A. now may want to add a step; after moving the directory, put a soft link in the /usr/local/portage pointing to the new location; i.e. cd /usr/local/portage; ln -s /var/lib

[gentoo-user] Re: Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-01 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 03/01/10 13:26, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 03/01/2010 08:08 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: (this is a rather obvious fix...) eselect news has a new notice, advising of the pending change of the presumed location of the layman directory from /usr/local/portage/layman to /var/lib/layman. It offers

[gentoo-user] Re: Pending layman directory relocation

2010-03-02 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 03/01/10 18:09, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:07:07 -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: Or you can edit /var/lib/layman/make.conf and change the locations there. That didn't work for me; the current layman script still references the old location; which is why I added the soft link

[gentoo-user] libvdpau (?)

2010-03-26 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
I'd like to compile ffmpeg with vdpau - direct NVidia hardware acceleration. This is a configuration flag for ffmpeg. Setting the vdpau use flag seems to set the configuration flag, but also brings in the x11-libs/libvdpau libraries which I think I do not want, as my NVidia proprietary driver

[gentoo-user] Re: libvdpau (?)

2010-03-26 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 03/26/10 13:25, Kaddeh wrote: do you have VIDEO_CARDS set in your make.conf? Yes; and VIDEO_CARDS=nvidia seems to be picked up just fine. Thanks for helping.

[gentoo-user] Re: libvdpau (?)

2010-03-26 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 03/26/10 14:29, Alex Kuster wrote: yes, because ffmpeg compiles against the shared library called vdpau to do the hardware acceleration ... so, the dependency IS necessary ... Thanks for the reply. Just downloaded the ffmpeg source distribution and FWICT, the ffmpeg source distribution

[gentoo-user] Re: libvdpau (?)

2010-03-26 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Is there a file anywhere that I can edit, which mandates that to use the vdpau use flag, I have to have the vdpau package installed? geze.. there it is in the ebuild. Removed the dependency and all compiles/works well. Thanks for the time and help!!

[gentoo-user] Re: libvdpau (?)

2010-03-26 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 03/26/10 17:08, Paul Hartman wrote: On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:18 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o7v5w7go9u...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to compile ffmpeg with vdpau - direct NVidia hardware acceleration. This is a configuration flag for ffmpeg. Setting the vdpau use flag seems to set the configuration

[gentoo-user] ffmpeg threads parameter

2010-03-27 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Some ffmpeg-using applications (e.g. mplayer) allow you to pass numbers of threads (e.g. I use 6 on my Core-I7) to ffmpeg; others (e.g. chromium) do not. So I'm thinking of hardwiring a default threads number=6 into the ffmpeg source code; recompiling. Q: Has anyone done this; if so any

[gentoo-user] Re: ffmpeg threads parameter

2010-03-27 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 03/27/10 21:17, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 03/28/2010 02:40 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: Some ffmpeg-using applications (e.g. mplayer) allow you to pass numbers of threads (e.g. I use 6 on my Core-I7) to ffmpeg; others (e.g. chromium) do not. First, mplayer uses its own bundled ffmpeg

[gentoo-user] Re: Fast checksumming of whole partitions

2010-06-05 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 06/05/10 02:39, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: [] Is there any faster and reliable way to checksum whole paritions (not on per file base)??? FWIW, portage has a tool called dcfldd that works well for me. It is dd with the addition of: * Hashing on-the-fly - dcfldd can hash the input

[gentoo-user] Re: Fast checksumming of whole partitions

2010-06-06 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 06/06/10 06:19, Andrea Conti wrote: 1. boot up knoppix 2. create a partition: mkdir /work 3. mount /work to the root partition: mount /dev/sdc /work 4. cd /work/usr/bin 5. run dcfldd: ./dcfldd This is fine, provided that 1- if the root partition is [part of] what you're copying, you

[gentoo-user] Re: Fast checksumming of whole partitions

2010-06-06 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 06/05/10 16:11, Manuel Klemenz wrote: I'm calculating checksums over partitions just by calling # md5sum /dev/sda1 or for the complete disk (incl. partition table + all partitions) # md5sum /dev/sda that's it :) - works with any distro/liveDVD Yep.. don't have to fool with an oddball

[gentoo-user] Re: Fast checksumming of whole partitions

2010-06-06 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 06/06/10 15:47, Joerg Schilling wrote: 7v5w7go9ub0o7v5w7go9u...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/05/10 16:11, Manuel Klemenz wrote: I'm calculating checksums over partitions just by calling # md5sum /dev/sda1 or for the complete disk (incl. partition table + all partitions) # md5sum /dev/sda

[gentoo-user] Re: Fast checksumming of whole partitions

2010-06-06 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 06/06/10 16:45, Andrea Conti wrote: 1- if the root partition is [part of] what you're copying, you *must* mount it read-only (mount -o ro /dev/sdc /work) Not from my experience; I simply mount, exec, and go - Works fine Let's say you are 50% done copying a partition, when something

[gentoo-user] Re: anyone using Lilo to dual-boot ?

2010-07-12 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 07/12/10 01:52, Philip Webb wrote: [] Is anyone successfully dual-booting Linux distros using Lilo ? Might it be ReiserFS ? -- should I re-install Ubuntu with another FS ? Hard to believe that the filesystem is causing a problem. Here's my conf (I have two kernels on the same OS; one

[gentoo-user] Re: Rooted/compromised Gentoo, seeking advice

2010-08-09 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
On 08/09/10 12:25, Paul Hartman wrote: [] If anyone has advice on what I should look at forensically to determine the cause of this, it is appreciated. I'll first dig into the logs, bash history etc. and really hope that this very happened recently. Thanks for any tips and wish me good luck.

[gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel = superkernel

2010-11-23 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
FYI. If anyone understands the bash tweak, please explain :-) TIA 1. Original article: The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_2637_videonum=1 2. The alternative (or additional) bash tweak:

  1   2   >