Re: [gentoo-user] RAID 1 vs RAID 0 - Read perfonmance

2014-02-24 Thread Jarry
On 24-Feb-14 7:27, Facundo Curti wrote: n= number of disks reads: raid1: n*2 raid0: n*2 writes: raid1: n raid0: n*2 But, in real life, the reads from raid 0 doesn't work at all, because if you use chunk size from 4k, and you need to read just 2kb (most binary files, txt files,

Re: [gentoo-user] RAID 1 vs RAID 0 - Read perfonmance

2014-02-24 Thread Facundo Curti
Thank you all! :) I finally have all clear. I'm going to do raid 10. Any way, I'm going to do a benchmark before to install. Thank you!;) 2014-02-24 14:03 GMT-03:00 Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com: On 24-Feb-14 7:27, Facundo Curti wrote: n= number of disks reads: raid1: n*2 raid0: n*2

[gentoo-user] RAID 1 vs RAID 0 - Read perfonmance

2014-02-23 Thread Facundo Curti
Hi. I am again, with a similar question to previous. I want to install RAID on SSD's. Comparing THEORETICALLY, RAID0 (stripe) vs RAID1 (mirrior). The performance would be something like this: n= number of disks reads: raid1: n*2 raid0: n*2 writes: raid1: n raid0: n*2 But, in real

Re: [gentoo-user] RAID 1 vs RAID 0 - Read perfonmance

2014-02-23 Thread Kerin Millar
On 24/02/2014 06:27, Facundo Curti wrote: Hi. I am again, with a similar question to previous. I want to install RAID on SSD's. Comparing THEORETICALLY, RAID0 (stripe) vs RAID1 (mirrior). The performance would be something like this: n= number of disks reads: raid1: n*2 raid0: n*2