On Mittwoch 11 Februar 2009, james wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerarmin at googlemail.com writes:
6. emerge -DNv kde-meta
Look plausible? Verbose comments are most welcome.
just emerge the kde-4.2 set instead of that meta stuff.
Is there a problem with kde-meta-4.2.0 ? I have
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:29 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
Volker and Alan,
Finally, try to use sets if possible. The split -meta ebuilds were an ugly
hack until sets made it into portage. They were orders of magnitude better
than
james wrote:
Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gentoo at gmail.com writes:
Basically, sets start with @ and you would just emerge like a meta,
emerge @kde-4.2 (or whatever). You can do emerge --list-sets to see
which are available to you. Rather than being meta listed in
/var/lib/portage/world
On Thursday 12 February 2009 07:01:36 Dale wrote:
Sorry to butt in here. I !think! I get what sets does, you add a group
of packages to a file and then when you do the @sets thing, it
emerges/upgrades that group of packages. I get that part. I guess from
what I am reading that we the user
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 12 February 2009 07:01:36 Dale wrote:
Sorry to butt in here. I !think! I get what sets does, you add a group
of packages to a file and then when you do the @sets thing, it
emerges/upgrades that group of packages. I get that part. I guess from
what I am
5 matches
Mail list logo
