Without any controls on CO2 emissions who'a gon'a call? - Geoengineering!
Congratulations guys - don't blow it. -G
EPA memo bans to curb CO2 emissions
Dina Cappiello, Associated Press
Friday, December 19, 2008
(12-19) 04:00 PST Washington - --
The Bush administration is trying to make sure in
David Schnare wrote:
No, we did not say there will be no controls on CO2 emissions. The
Agency only stated that CO2 is not properly considered under Clean Air
Act permitting at this time. The reasons are technical legal reasons
and the make complete sense. I have spoken with Steve about
Interim results from a survey of the members of the 'Geoengineering'
google group are as follows:
Please can anyone who hasn't filled this out yet do so at:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=QyDd_2fy3cpcZvMI5E3DsJGQ_3d_3d
The Independent Survey on Geoengineering:
1. Are you more, or less
Hello Ken,
Googlegroup has been immensely valuable ever since its inception,
which was entirely due to you. I totally understand your current
frustration. But it'd be a major loss if it ceased, and without you it
would be sorely diminished.
So please adopt Option 1. Hopefully, after an
If he really said no till agriculture, then that's not geoengineering and
afforestation without identifying which forests and where is also not a good
idea. The comments below are from the blogger and not me. I also notice that
the link to geoengineering is to the recently revised Wikipedia
Dear Ken:
I second John Latham's note except I would choose the second option.
Both options are rather bad, however. Geo has accomplished what I had
hoped it might. It has provided a global forum on geoengineering and
related themes. In my opinion this Google Group attention will lead
All:
Tom Wigley Ken C are both right.
We need the geo group, but more important, this is the moment to speak truth to
power. Our proper channel is John Holdren, and I share Tom's feelings, because
I know him well.
John I were postdocs at Livermore in the late 1960s. We're old
Purely on my own, I beg to differ on this analysis regarding John HoldrenĀ¹s
position, having been a coauthor of the report done for the UN Commission on
Sustainable Development (see
http://www.unfoundation.org/press-center/press-releases/2007/science-panel-o
utlines-roadmap-climate-change.html).
Please keep the group more or less as it is-somehow or other. It is invaluable
even if it strays into too much politics occasionally.
John Gorman
- Original Message -
From: Ken Caldeira
To: geoengineering
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 7:00 PM
Subject: [geo] REGARDING