Hi Stephen,
Thanks for this paper with an interesting theory about the 100,000 year
cycles. Generally speaking the warming in periods of de-glaciation is more
rapid than the cooling during glaciation, so you get a saw-tooth curve,
both for the 100,000 year cycle and sub-cycles within it. I
The goal is not weather modification or anything to do with weather but to
alter/control slightly the average, local, long term temperature i.e. local
climate modification not weather control. Hence your comments on controlling
weather offer no insight into a totally different issue. Limited
http://m.physicstoday.org/resource/1/phtoad/v66/i8/p8_s3?bypassSSO=1
I read with interest David Kramer’s piece on geoengineering (Physics
Today, February 2013, page 17). I must say, I am more alarmed by what the
geoengineers in his report are proposing than by the climate changes that
are taking
http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/geoengineeringcfp201307
Call for Papers for Special Issue of JET on “The Ethics of Geoengineering”
Posted: Jul 27, 2013
Submissions are invited for a special issue of the Journal of Evolution and
Technology on the topic of the Ethics of Geoengineering.
Hi Folks,
Regrettably, I can not read the full paper and can only offer up minor
comments/questions which might be covered in the full paper. The abstract
closes with: ***Carbon dioxide is involved, but is not determinative, in
the evolution of the 100,000-year glacial cycles.. *What is
