[geo] Opinion Article by Horton, Parker and Keith on Solar Geoengineering and the Problem of Liability

2013-11-19 Thread Geoengineering Our Climate (eds. Blackstock, Miller and Rayner)
Dear colleagues, For the *Geoengineering Our Climate?* Working Paper Series, Joshua B. Horton, Andrew Parker, and David Keith (Harvard University) have written an Opinion Article on *Solar Geoengineering and the Problem of Liability*. In this short article, they explore the need for, precedents

[geo] Reminder: Submit Proposals for CEC14 sessions by December 6

2013-11-19 Thread i...@ce-conference.org
Dear colleagues, We would like to remind and encourage you all to submit proposals for sessions to the Climate Engineering Conference 2014: Critical Global Discussionshttp://www.ce-conference.org/, for which the deadline is December 6th, 2013. Proposals submitted after this deadline will only

RE: [geo] biochar as CDR and related nomenclature issues: CDRS = CDR + S (carbon dioxide removal + storage)

2013-11-19 Thread French, Bruce
Ken, I concur that massive storage is essential. Again, we might want to direct our attentions to the capacity of the oceans for increasing biomass throughout the food web. One might postulate the current ocean fishery-biomass is considerably reduced from that existing around 1700.

Re: [geo] Re: biochar as CDR and related nomenclature issues: CDRS = CDR + S (carbon dioxide removal + storage)

2013-11-19 Thread Keith Henson
Some years ago I calculated how much energy it would take to convert 100 ppm of CO2 into synthetic oil which could be stored in old oil fields safely for millions of years. 100 ppm of CO2 would be 470 cubic km of the stuff. It's what humans added to the atmosphere since ~1960. Had to define a

Re: [geo] Re: biochar as CDR and related nomenclature issues: CDRS = CDR + S (carbon dioxide removal + storage)

2013-11-19 Thread Ronal W. Larson
Keith cc list 1. Since this is a thread with a biochar theme, I thought we should compare a hypothetical biochar scenario with your solar power satellite (SPS) scenario. 2. Because char is lighter than oil (I assume relative density of 1/3), I got 1200 km3 of char, assuming 400 Gt of