Poster's note: Thread from Jesse shows a media disaster unfolding. A
combination of a widely-criticised study; paywalls; and careless,
politically-slanted media serves to grossly and fundamentals mislead the
voting public about our discipline. This is probably the most
widely-reported study this ye
I really think this paper needs a rebuttal. I'm happy to work on it, even
if that's just (uncredited) coordination. It's a disastrously bad situation
when this kind of sloppy science achieves global prominence.
A
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018, 13:28 Douglas MacMartin, wrote:
> And to add to Anthony,
>
>
And to add to Anthony,
-Data is too limited to do what they want (really only one major
volcanic eruption, which is confounded by an El Nino, which they try to
subtract off of the signal by assuming that every El Nino has an identical
effect)
-The solar dimming and many precipi
