Sabine Hossenfelder, a theoretical physicist and youtube commentator,
summarizes two recent papers on climate engineering for the public. She has
about 1.17 million subscribers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZiEcx0F_CM
"Climate engineering is the cheapest way to get us out of this
Members,
I'm very disappointed that my robustly worded message regarding frequent
and irrelevant cross posting from HPAC to the geo list has been widely
ignored, including by many otherwise reputable people in this community. As
a result I've had to take the entirely unprecedented step of
(source redacted for security reasons)
Considering how Silver Lining likes to share how concerned they are with
the governance of SRM
https://twitter.com/SilverLiningNGO/status/1764788454037028916, this group
might be interested to know that a new private meeting of the Silver Lining
science
Oswald
The group description now states solar geoengineering - but this hasn't
been raised as an issue before, as I believe members are generally clear on
the group's purpose.
Methane (arctic or otherwise) is greenhouse gas removal, normally grouped
with CDR. Just like cirrus cloud thinning is
*This item and others will be in the monthly “Solar Geoengineering Updates
Substack” newsletter:* https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/
---
https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/15/191/2024/
*Authors*
Yan Zhang, Douglas G.
It's an interesting discussion, as it actually raises questions about Iron
Salt Aerosols more generally. My concern is they do too much - leading to
uncertain magnitude and sign of effects.
I'm happy to see ISA discussion on the geo list, if there's an obvious
content cross over with SRM - re
The Geoengineering Google Group covers SRM only (including CCT, etc). This
has been true since Greg Rau forked off the CDR Google group.
I - and doubtless many other list members - are heartily sick of HPAC cross
posting. I've asked politely already. If you continue to break the rules
you will
