Re: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

in the near future. Regards John gorman - Original Message - From: Ken Caldeira To: geoengineering Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 4:08 PM Subject: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk? Folks, There is some

RE: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk? Greetings, If I wanted to research geoengineering, I wouldn't form an formal geoengineering society, because the press releases it would trigger would likely be counter-productive to my research. Plus, my

RE: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of James R. Fleming Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 6:05 PM To: kcalde...@gmail.com; geoengineering Subject: Re: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk? Ken, First of all

[geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

Folks, There is some discussion in DC about making some small amount of public funds available to support SRM and CDR research. In today's funding climate, it is much more likely that someone might be given authority to re-allocate existing budgets than that they would actually be given

RE: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

] On Behalf Of Ken Caldeira Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 11:08 AM To: geoengineering Subject: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk? Folks, There is some discussion in DC about making some small amount of public funds available to support SRM and CDR

Re: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

Hi I'd focus on clarifying SRM capabilities. For that money, we can make test scale deployments of sulfur aerosols, bright water and cloud brightening. At present our understanding of the basic science of all of these is poor, so engineering appropriate delivery technology is much less relevant

RE: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

Of Andrew Lockley Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 1:46 PM To: kcalde...@gmail.com Cc: geoengineering Subject: Re: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk? Hi I'd focus on clarifying SRM capabilities. For that money, we can make test scale deployments

Re: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

-0700 To: Google Group geoengineering@googlegroups.com Subject: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk? Folks, There is some discussion in DC about making some small amount of public funds available to support SRM and CDR research. In today's funding

Re: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

...@carnegie.stanford.edu *Reply-To: *kcalde...@gmail.com *Date: *Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:08:25 -0700 *To: *Google Group geoengineering@googlegroups.com *Subject: *[geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk? Folks, There is some discussion in DC about making some small amount

Re: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

Subject: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk? Folks, There is some discussion in DC about making some small amount of public funds available to support SRM and CDR research. In today's funding climate, it is much more likely that someone might be given

Re: Re: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

...@carnegie.stanford.edu Reply-To: kcalde...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:08:25 -0700 To: Google Group geoengineering@googlegroups.com Subject: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk? Folks, There is some discussion in DC about making some small amount

Re: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

Broad RFPs for multi-year consortia -- maybe four three-year $5million grants to begin with. Define the goals that the research should support -- eg development and assessment of a 1W/m^2 (global average) SRM technology -- not the technologies that should be used. Provide a way for the scoring

Re: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk?

@googlegroups.com Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 5:36:33 PM Subject: Re: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce climate risk? Broad RFPs for multi-year consortia -- maybe four three-year $5million grants to begin with. Define the goals that the research should support -- eg