Re: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition

2013-07-14 Thread William H. Calvin
s CO2 exceeding saturation would be a liquid or a hydrate. Mark E. Capron, PE Ventura, California www.PODenergy.org Original Message Subject: RE: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition From: Peter Flynn Date: Sat, July 13,

RE: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition

2013-07-13 Thread markcapron
ters and 60,000 ppm.  Below about 500 meters CO2 exceeding saturation would be a liquid or a hydrate.Mark E. Capron, PEVentura, Californiawww.PODenergy.org Original Message Subject: RE: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering c

RE: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition

2013-07-13 Thread Peter Flynn
l...@gmail.com *Cc:* geoengineering *Subject:* RE: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition Bill, At a quick glance: 1. I did not detect your nutrient cycling or nutrient mass balancing. There may be sufficient N, P, K, iron,

Re: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition

2013-07-13 Thread rongretlarson
William : Can you give a URL for the "judges report"? Ron - Original Message - From: "William H. Calvin" To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 8:10:28 PM Subject: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the

Re: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition

2013-07-13 Thread John Nissen
ash-free biomass) hitting > the deep seafloor should be converted to CH4 and CO2 within a decade, if > not sooner. > > > > Mark E. Capron, PE > Ventura, California > www.PODenergy.org > > > > Original Message > Subject: Re: [geo] My big-

RE: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition

2013-07-12 Thread Peter Flynn
...@podenergy.org *Sent:* July-12-13 9:40 PM *To:* andrew.lock...@gmail.com; william.cal...@gmail.com *Cc:* geoengineering *Subject:* RE: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition Bill, At a quick glance: 1. I did not detect your

RE: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition

2013-07-12 Thread markcapron
nverted to CH4 and CO2 within a decade, if not sooner.  Mark E. Capron, PEVentura, Californiawww.PODenergy.org Original Message Subject: Re: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition From: Andrew Lockley <andrew.lock...@gm

Re: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition

2013-07-12 Thread Andrew Lockley
I looked through it in detail earlier. Where's the evidence you can get anywhere near the numbers you need? A On Jul 13, 2013 4:13 AM, "William H. Calvin" wrote: > I seem to be one of the three finalists in this geoengineering > competition, despite both judges remaining dubious and dismissive.

[geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still alive at the MIT geoengineering competition

2013-07-12 Thread William H. Calvin
I seem to be one of the three finalists in this geoengineering competition, despite both judges remaining dubious and dismissive. You can judge for yourself, as it is all at * http://climatecolab.org/web/guest/plans/-/plans/contestId/20/planId/1302501*