The notion that geoengineering disempowers those in developing countries
is a very odd argument, IMO. How many times do we need to see analyses
that say developing countries will be very seriously impacted by climate
change before we're willing to say that they have such a huge incentive to
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Max Mogren maxmog...@gmail.com wrote:
Re:#1 I call chemotherapy a techno-fix for cancer (and a criminally
expensive one at that). Less techno-based fixes for cancer include banning
carcinogenic products/chemicals/pesticides, promoting vegetarianism,
Vitamin
It seems their critique boils down to:
(1) It is a techno-fix
(2) They claim (without substantiation) that it disempowers people from
developing countries
(3) That it would need to be deployed at large scale.
While (3) is clearly right, I think few people see solar geoengineering as
a fix
