We already use Google alerts. Sifting out low quality and irrelevant
material, removing duplicates, etc. takes a longtime.
People can post whatever they want to the list - announcements or
discussion. It's not finding the first paper that takes the time, it's
finding the last one. It's hard
I see it thus: The papers often prompt discussion. Moreover, the papers ARE
the discussion. PS If you have an effective aggregation service, let me
know. It would save me time and money!
On Sat, 15 May 2021, 02:07 Anton Alferness, wrote:
> I use multiple news / scientific paper aggregation
The reason is that my twitter is also @geoengineering1 (geoengineering
info).
There's no bias, the same posting formula is followed as I've done myself
for years. Nobody accused me of bias in what I share, and I don't really
say anything.
If people have thoughts on branding fair enough
Hi Andrew,
A complementary thought on this subject.
Carbon Dioxide Removal, GHG Removal (GGR) and NETs are completely
different from GEOENGINEERING, and many of us don't want to see GEO or SRM
or SAI be associated with CDR in the public mind. *This is the principal
reason why the CDR list has
