geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:10:02 PM
Subject: [geo] Re: Calgary meeting on Direct Air Capture - thoughts?
Like Oliver, I attended the Calgary conference and I believe that air
capture technology is worth pursuing--not as a substitute for CCS,
surely
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ken Caldeira
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 7:17 AM
To: gh...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: Geoengineering; soco...@princeton.edu; Howard Herzog; John
Schellnhuber
Subject: Re: [geo] Calgary meeting on Direct Air Capture - thoughts
[mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ken Caldeira
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 7:17 AM
To: gh...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: Geoengineering; soco...@princeton.edu; Howard Herzog; John
Schellnhuber
Subject: Re: [geo] Calgary meeting on Direct Air Capture - thoughts?
So what is the DAC business model, why
: Geoengineering; soco...@princeton.edu; Howard Herzog; John
Schellnhuber
Subject: Re: [geo] Calgary meeting on Direct Air Capture - thoughts?
So what is the DAC business model, why is venture capital interested,
and what does it have to do with stabilizing air CO2? -- GH Rau
Greg, I think you hit
] Calgary meeting on Direct Air Capture - thoughts?
So what is the DAC business model, why is venture capital interested,
and what does it have to do with stabilizing air CO2? -- GH Rau
Greg, I think you hit the nail on the head.
If we think of direct air capture as negative emissions
