cooling down rather than hotting up and lacks sunspots.
With kind regards,
Veli Albert Kallio
The climatic
From: euggor...@comcast.net
To: wig...@ucar.edu; augustusl...@googlemail.com
CC: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: [geo] Re: Televised debate
Date: Thu
in orbit are all good ideas. Meanwhile,
Australis seems to be burning to the ground.
-Original Message-
From: dsw_s ds...@yahoo.com
Sent: May 1, 2009 9:22 PM
To: geoengineering geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: [geo] Re: Televised debate
There are also another much less
...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of David Schnare
Sent: May 3, 2009 2:30 PM
To: kcalde...@globalecology.stanford.edu
Cc: ronald.da...@earthlink.net; ds...@yahoo.com; geoengineering
Subject: [geo] Re: Televised debate
Ken:
There is no argument about long-term global warming. That warming
] On Behalf Of David Schnare
Sent: May 3, 2009 2:30 PM
To: kcalde...@globalecology.stanford.edu
Cc: ronald.da...@earthlink.net; ds...@yahoo.com; geoengineering
Subject: [geo] Re: Televised debate
Ken:
There is no argument about long-term global warming. That warming, if it
continues
:
geoengineer...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *David Schnare
*Sent:* May 3, 2009 2:30 PM
*To:* kcalde...@globalecology.stanford.edu
*Cc:* ronald.da...@earthlink.net; ds...@yahoo.com; geoengineering
*Subject:* [geo] Re: Televised debate
Ken:
There is no argument about long-term global
...@gmail.com [mailto:kcalde...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Ken
Caldeira
Sent: May 3, 2009 10:29 PM
To: David Schnare
Cc: David Keith; ronald.da...@earthlink.net; ds...@yahoo.com;
geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Re: Televised debate
The report to Johnson is available at:
http://dge.stanford.edu/DGE
: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: [geo] Re: Televised debate
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:16:52 -0400
I keep saying it but you all seem to either disagree, but say nothing, or do
not understand. While a higher concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere should
increase average surface
I got an inquiry from the Wall Street Journal asking me if I would be
willing to argue a similar position in their pages. (The answer was 'no'.)
It is odd that journalists want to see proponents of developing climate
intervention options arguing untenable positions.
Journalists seem to be the
Dear Alvia and Samuel,
You're right, that was bad phrasing on my part.
In any case we would not take that university debating club approach of
debating a 'statement' - I was just trying to get the idea across...
Best,
Gus
On 30/04/2009 15:26, Alvia Gaskill agask...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Why
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:35:37 +0100
Subject: [geo] Re: Televised debate
From: augustusl...@googlemail.com
To: agask...@nc.rr.com; geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Dear Alvia and Samuel,
You're right, that was bad phrasing on my part.
In any case we would not take that university
: [geo] Re: Televised debate
From: augustusl...@googlemail.com
To: agask...@nc.rr.com; geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Dear Alvia and Samuel,
You're right, that was bad phrasing on my part.
In any case we would not take that university debating club
approach of
debating
by:
His Excellency Kofi Annan (former UN Secretary General)
His Excellency Jose Manuel Barroso (President of European Commission)
HAH Bartholomaios I (the Head of 350-million Greek Catholic Church)
From: kcalde...@gmail.com
To: albert_kal...@hotmail.com
Subject: [geo] Re: Televised debate
Date
Lamb
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:36 AM
To: Alvia Gaskill; geoengineering
Subject: [geo] Re: Televised debate
Dear Alvia and Samuel,
You're right, that was bad phrasing on my part.
In any case we would not take that university debating club approach of
debating a 'statement' - I was just
Are you crazy? This is not the question. No-one on the geoeng side
is suggesting we give up on mitigation. We MUST MUST MUST do this.
Geoeng will (in my view) probably needed as well.
Please see my paper on Combined Mitigation and Geoeng in Science
a couple of years ago.
Tom.
[mailto:geoengineer...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of wig...@ucar.edu
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 4:15 PM
To: augustusl...@googlemail.com
Cc: geoengineering
Subject: [geo] Re: Televised debate
Are you crazy? This is not the question. No-one on the geoeng side
is suggesting we give up on mitigation. We
...@ucar.edu
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 4:15 PM
To: augustusl...@googlemail.com
Cc: geoengineering
Subject: [geo] Re: Televised debate
Are you crazy? This is not the question. No-one on the geoeng side
is suggesting we give up on mitigation. We MUST MUST MUST do this.
Geoeng will (in my view
16 matches
Mail list logo
