Re: FW: [geo] Stopping the Flood: Could We Use Targeted Geoengineering to Mitigate Sea Level Rise?

2018-08-05 Thread Veli Albert Kallio
ever made. From: Andrew Lockley Sent: 02 August 2018 11:42 To: Ken Caldeira Cc: Albert Kallio; geoengineering Subject: Re: FW: [geo] Stopping the Flood: Could We Use Targeted Geoengineering to Mitigate Sea Level Rise? The Russian civil engineering operations would

Re: FW: [geo] Stopping the Flood: Could We Use Targeted Geoengineering to Mitigate Sea Level Rise?

2018-08-02 Thread Andrew Lockley
The Russian civil engineering operations would be a good place to start. I expect there were some calculations, which may still be available. Various blasts were conducted, providing real world case studies. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peaceful_nuclear_explosion Large earth moving

Re: FW: [geo] Stopping the Flood: Could We Use Targeted Geoengineering to Mitigate Sea Level Rise?

2018-08-02 Thread Ken Caldeira
Andrew, At this point we are looking for actual geomechanical analysis with numbers. Piling speculation upon speculation is not helpful. Best, Ken On Wed, Aug 1, 2018, 08:28 Andrew Lockley wrote: > Large explosive charges, tens or hundreds of metres beneath the sea bed, > would create a

Re: FW: [geo] Stopping the Flood: Could We Use Targeted Geoengineering to Mitigate Sea Level Rise?

2018-08-01 Thread Andrew Lockley
Large explosive charges, tens or hundreds of metres beneath the sea bed, would create a crater with an elevated ring of debris. This ring would tend to jam ice in an otherwise smooth sea bed, if it was tall enough to protrude into the surface waters. I understand that the Russians had a

Re: FW: [geo] Stopping the Flood: Could We Use Targeted Geoengineering to Mitigate Sea Level Rise?

2018-08-01 Thread Ken Caldeira
Below is what I wrote to a writer for the Atlantic, Robinson Meyer: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/01/a-new-geo-engineering-proposal-to-stop-sea-level-rise/550214/ What got into the piece was: Ken Caldeira, a climate scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science, said that