*Hi John,*
I have said that your train of logic is just what we would be needing
today. Go for your *manifesto,* I am all for it !
We have been talking about long term solutions for too long, let's act on
the immediate term solution from *John * -- this might even buy us time to
come up
Hi Peter‹Problem with your analysis is that biosphere also gives off
something like 60 GtC as well. Preindustrial with steady CO2, as much was
being taken up and given off. The net uptake, driven by the gradient created
by emissions is now something like 1 GtC/yr and would equilibrate well
before
Re: [geo] Re: Rejected - a simple argument for SRM geoengineering AND did you
get that right?From Lenton and Vaughn (2009):
First we consider the calculation of effects on atmospheric
CO2 (deltaCatm) over time. Adding CO2 to the atmosphere or
removing CO2 from the atmosphere triggers responses
Re: [geo] A simple argument for SRM geoengineering, again.I used sulphate as an
example because my understanding is that this is the only SRM technology that
we are confident would work. I think your interesting recent paper confirms
that view, although it mentions a number of other
