To Ron, I will just insert a few things *like so *to clarify what I think:
On Monday, October 28, 2013 8:07:27 PM UTC-4, Ron wrote:
Brian and list:
See inserts below. Re the first sentence below on Dr. Shiva, see a
message I just sent. I go further than you about “rhetorically
Poster's note - One argument for geoengineering readiness is the risk of a
climate runaway. The classic runaway case is that of Venus, which goes 'to
infinity and beyond' (Lightyear, 1995). Hansen, as I recall, has argued
that this is feasible on earth as a result of AGW. The model run below
Dear colleagues,
For the Geoengineering Our Climate? working paper series, Alan Robock
(Rutgers) and Ben Kravitz (PNNL) have written an opinion article *Use of
Models, Analogs and Field-tests for Geoengineering Research*. Below is an
excerpt from the introduction (in lieu of an abstract):
we need to do a chat for dot earth when you have time (google+ hangout?). i
have book and started to go through it. will take til next week to get it
done given flow of other stuff.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:55 AM, David Keith davidkeit...@gmail.com wrote:
My book *A Case for Climate
Sorry, didn't see footnote [1]:
*[1]http://geoengineeringourclimate.com/2013/10/29/use-of-models-analogs-and-field-tests-for-geoengineering-research/#_ftnref1
In
this paper we only address solar radiation management and use the term
“geoengineering” to specifically refer to those sets of
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2013/10/geoengineering-opportunity-or-folly/
Geoengineering: Opportunity or folly? | Harvard Gazette
By Alvin Powell, Harvard Staff Writer
The technology to shield Earth from sunrays and cut the harmful warming
expected in the coming decades is so cheap and
