Hi all,
I also think that Professor Calvin's analysis is superb, and we have to
find a way to draw down 30 Gt of carbon per year. We might allow ten years
to ramp up to this level - with a view to achieving carbon neutrality by
the end of that period. During the following years we should
This event, organised by the Environmental Sustainability Knowledge
Transfer Network, will provide an overview of Negative Emissions
Technologies and a forum to discuss their challenges and opportunities.
Click here for details: https://connect.innovateuk.org/web/10268330 Negative
Emission
Curiously, no mention of possible NASA involvement in SRM--seems a bit more
obvious...
Josh
http://www.project-syndicate.org/online-commentary/nasa-geo-engineering-to-prevent-climate-change-by-jim-hartung
Can NASA Stop Global
I'm pretty sure the authors didn't intend this article as an endorsement of
social authoritarianism, but that seems to be the conclusion reached here
...
Josh Horton
http://www.science20.com/news_articles/geoengineering_committee_time_get_totalitarian-104431
Geoengineering By Committee? Time
NASA is already piloting what may be the most promising Carbon Dioxide
Reduction pilot through the Offshore Membrane Enclosures for Growing Algae
(OMEGA) project at the AMES Research Center.
OMEGA website is http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/research/OMEGA/index.html.
I recommend Dr Jonathan
Photos and video from the event now available on
http://www.flickr.com/photos/policyexchange/sets/72157632861199743/
Best,
Henrik Karlsson
Den tisdagen den 12:e februari 2013 kl. 11:30:05 UTC+1 skrev Tim Kruger:
Manipulating the planet: Is there a role for Negative Emissions
Technologies in
NASA's mission is to pioneer the future in space
explorationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_exploration
, scientific discovery http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science and
aeronautics research.
NOAA usually takes on operational tasks. They are typically not considered
an operational agency.
Of
