Hi Greg,
You are right that CBD should consider the consequences of
*not*geoengineering. CDR techniques to reduce the CO2 level in the
atmosphere
are now mandatory, because there is already an intolerable amount of CO2 in
the atmosphere - both for ocean acidification and global warming reasons.
http://climate-l.iisd.org/news/cbd-secretariat-invites-parties-submissions-on-geo-engineering-related-measures/
CBD Secretariat Invites Parties’ Submissions on Geo-Engineering-Related
Measures
12 November 2013: The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
(CBD) has invited parties
Agree. What are the consequences/risks to biodiversity of not
evaluating/considering GE in the face of rising CO2?
Greg
On 11/20/13 9:01 AM, Stephen Salter s.sal...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
Hi All
Should they also ask for a list of inactivities such as NOT doing a form
geoengineering which could have
