Caldeira
*Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2011 7:26 PM
*To:* rongretlar...@comcast.net
*Cc:* macma...@cds.caltech.edu; geoengineering;
nadine.brachat...@sowi.uni-stuttgart.de
*Subject:* Re: [geo] Can We Test Geoengineering? paper and YouTube videos*
***
** **
Ron,
Thank you for your
...@comcast.net
Cc: macma...@cds.caltech.edu mailto:macma...@cds.caltech.edu ;
geoengineering; nadine.brachat...@sowi.uni-stuttgart.de
mailto:nadine.brachat...@sowi.uni-stuttgart.de
Subject: Re: [geo] Can We Test Geoengineering? paper and YouTube videos
Ron,
Thank you for your substantive
...@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 11:16 AM
To: Hawkins, Dave; Ken Caldeira
Cc: Doug MacMynowski; rongretlar...@comcast.net; Geoengineering;
nadine.brachat...@sowi.uni-stuttgart.de
Subject: Re: [geo] Can We Test Geoengineering? paper and YouTube videos
True-but we also don't know nearly
: [geo] Can We Test Geoengineering? paper and YouTube videos
True‹but we also don¹t know nearly everything about what ongoing GHG emissions
will bring, so what we need to work toward, in my view, is a relative risk
analysis. Not at all easy to do, but the question is not really SRM
Hi Folks,
I am studying Dr. Jaffe's work on China's pollution transport. This is the
article which caught my attention.
http://discovermagazine.com/2011/apr/18-made-in-china-our-toxic-imported-air-pollution
It was the first time anyone had decisively identified Asian mercury in
American air,
Dear Colleges in the subject of Climate Engineering,
if you are doing it now in the USA you could get some questions that could
be hard to answer to public perceptions: The USA was a meaningful exception
in the Kyoto protocol now wanting geo-engineering tests. At the same time
the Kyoto
; geoengineering;
nadine.brachat...@sowi.uni-stuttgart.de
Subject: Re: [geo] Can We Test Geoengineering? paper and YouTube videos
Ron,
Thank you for your substantive comments.
You are correct that we are talking only about SRM and Marchetti spoke only
about an approach to carbon storage -- something
