Greetings,
Ron, I'm glad you were able to take a look at the piece. It's true you
won't find surprising new research findings in the piece— it's more focused
on opening up the gender and geoengineering conversation. Is low
participation of women in geoengineering research any different than,
Technocracy is older than Roszak:
From the OED:
1919 W. H. Smyth in *Industr. Management* Mar. 211/2 For this unique
experiment in rationalized Industrial Democracy I have coined the term
‘technocracy’.
1932 *N.Y. Herald-Tribune* 15 Dec. 11/1 Technocracy..the name for a new
system and
Holly:
Thanks. A lot of new terrain to explore, but not for several weeks. See few
notes below.
On Jan 7, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Holly J holly.jean.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
Ron, I'm glad you were able to take a look at the piece. It's true you won't
find surprising new research
Andrew and list cc Holly Buck
1. I meant to respond earlier after reading the Christmas day piece below
(which no longer is free and my draft is somehow blocked by my computer,
although saved). I read it because I have been much impressed by other
material by Ms. Buck. I didn’t find
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./hypa.12083/abstract
Buck, H. J., Gammon, A. R. and Preston, C. J. (2013), Gender and
Geoengineering. Hypatia. doi: 10./hypa.12083
Abstract
Geoengineering has been broadly and helpfully defined as “the intentional
manipulation of the earth's climate
