[geo] Re: The possibility of unilateral covert SRM geoengineering.

2012-08-07 Thread Michael Hayes
Hello Mike et al., This is a question which begs the fundimental question of; What exactly *is*GE? It is clear from an overwhelming number of studies that current energy policies and FF usage is changing our climate. The legal concept of 'Reasonable Knowability' is well established and

Re: [geo] Re: The possibility of unilateral covert SRM geoengineering.

2012-08-07 Thread Andrew Lockley
Michael I personally feel that the term 'geoengineering' lacks clear meaning in a world which is already so heavily altered by the human race. Consider forestry, for example. There is still a net loss of Amazonian rainforest, and also loss of more minor forests, e.g. in Madagascar. We could

[geo] Re: The possibility of unilateral covert SRM geoengineering.

2012-07-31 Thread treasurecoastskywa...@yahoo.com
On Saturday, July 28, 2012 6:27:43 PM UTC-4, Mick West wrote: Is it possible that someone might be doing geoengineering, and we would not even know it? In Alan Robock's paper *Will Geoengineering [with SRM] Ever Be Used*, posted to the list yesterday, he says rather dramatically: *Even