Alan
I now decline such invitations because I consider them to be a trap. A
symmetric one-to-one or four-to-four debate with skeptics does not work in the
eyes of the public. It becomes a rhetoric thing. The public gets out that the
scientists disagree, which is the primary objective of the
That's classic moral hazard
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, 09:38 Stephen Salter, wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Let us agree that 'there is simply no substitute for decarbonisation'.
>
> But doing it will be difficult and slow.
>
> Geoengineering will give more time and so make it slightly less difficult.
>
>
-- Forwarded message -
From: Frank Keutsch
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019, 18:29
Subject: Job Opportunity - SCoPEx Advisory Committee Executive Coordinator
To:
Harvard is hiring a full-time Executive Coordinator to support the work of
the SCoPEx Advisory Committee.
View this email in
Hi folks,
I’m writing to correct an error made by Ray Pierrehumbert in a recent
opinion piece on SRM, which has only just come to my attention. In an
article published in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, Ray wrote:
“*it is apparent that over time, the Environmental Defense Fund is
You can’t convince people who are already convinced. This email offers you an
opportunity to change someone’s mind.
Klaus
From: on behalf of Andrew Revkin
Reply-To: Andrew Revkin
Date: Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 5:45 PM
To: Alan Robock
Cc: Geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] My CNN
The audience is not the people in the room. The audience is the people who
will receive the spin about the meeting and Heartland, not you, will control
that activity.
From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com on
behalf of Klaus Lackner
Sent: Friday, September 6,
Indeed. The very fact that they are staging a "debate" -- and e.g. pretend
its somehow linked to UN climate week -- is bad news all around. For what
it's worth, they've been making the rounds among climate
scientists/economists, (fortunately) only getting rejections, as far as I
can tell.
One
Yes, I already told them no. I just thought others would find this request
interesting.
Alan
On 9/6/2019 2:23 PM, Gernot Wagner wrote:
Indeed. The very fact that they are staging a "debate" -- and e.g. pretend its
somehow linked to UN climate week -- is bad news all around. For what it's
Hi Gideon,
I'd be interested in helping out here.
Pete
On Monday, 2 September 2019 04:42:53 UTC-4, Gideon Futerman wrote:
>
> Today Green New deal for Europe released their draft report for public
> consultation, where they speak extensively in Appendix A about
> geoengineering, both CDR and
https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/event/humor-geoengineering
HUMOR & GEOENGINEERING
Date:
Tuesday, September 17, 2019, 12:00pm to 1:00pm
Location:
Harvard University Center for the Environment, 26 Oxford Street, Room 429
"Humor & Geoengineering"
Humor, like geoengineering, is about
Bob Mankoff, ex cartoon editor of The New Yorker?! Anyway, I think we all could
use some humor right about now.
Greg
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 11:24 AM, Andrew Lockley wrote:
>
>
> https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/event/humor-geoengineering
>
> HUMOR &
“Four tech takeaways from the climate town hall,” by James Temple,
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/614274/four-tech-takeaways-from-the-climate-townhall/
Geoengineering’s public moment
Yang would also earmark $800 million for research into geoengineering—the idea
of cooling the planet by
-- Forwarded message -
From: Erica Dodds
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019, 13:29
Subject: Join us for the Climate Restoration Forum
To: Andrew
September 17 at the UN Headquarters in NYC
Now announcing FEATURED SPEAKERS for the Global Climate Restoration Forum
See Featured Speakers and
13 matches
Mail list logo
