Here's an interesting summarization on the subject by Smith, from a few
years ago:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=7P9W6pYJ&cstart=360&citation_for_view=7P9W6pYJ:N5tVd3kTz84C
Aryt
Larson"
wrote:
> List with ccs
>
> Inserted response comments below.
>
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 7:38 PM, aryt alasti wrote:
>
> I do very much so believe that there is huge potential for enhancing
> soil-sequestration capacities globally. Prof. Smith indicates tha
CS
with biochar.
Again - thanks for the additional Smith paper.
Ron
On Jan 17, 2016, at 1:23 AM, aryt alasti wrote:
Here's an interesting summarization on the subject by Smith, from a few
years ago:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&
Here's a response to that proposal, by Brad Plumer:
http://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2017/2/8/14547290/conservative-carbon-tax
Aryt
On Feb 10, 2017 2:33 AM, "Greg Rau" wrote:
> Perhaps a glimmer of hope over here s
gy storage problem. If we don't or
>> can't, then what is Plan B? So we need to also invest in decarbonating
>> fossil energy and air if we are serious about stabilizing and then lowering
>> air CO2 and global temps. Maybe the $40/tonne tax will be enough to
>> in
http://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2017/08/farming-with-biochar-could-cut-toxic-gas-pollution-by-up-to-one-third/
Aryt
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To
Global Thermostat's been doing this for a while.
http://globalthermostat.com/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.technologyreview.com/s/531346/can-sucking-co2-out-of-the-atmosphere-really-work/amp/
Aryt
On Oct 12, 2017 6:16 AM
Sulphur dioxide reduction has already been done with coal.
https://ampd.epa.gov/ampd/
Program
Year
SO2 (tons)
NOx (tons)
ARP
1980
17,260,730
0
ARP
1985
16,091,577
0
ARP
1990
15,733,106
0
ARP
1995
11,829,936.3
5,839,018.8
ARP
1996
12,513,447.4
6,011,296.4
ARP
1997
12,942,514.1
6,026,523.6
ARP
199
Perhaps that 2010 article should have been peer reviewed by climate
scientists. Even David Keith doesn't take the position that solar radiation
management and carbon capture ought to be substitutes for radically
reducing emissions. It's universally acknowledged that the Paris
commitments are thus f
