Although not widely distributed, I got so frustrated with an op-ed that
Lindzen was invited to submit to Newsweek several years ago that I put
together a point-by-point set of comments in response. Something like 19
points of difference for a one-page op-ed. Despite its length, I understand
it
Of david
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:26 AM
To: geoengineering
Subject: [geo] Re: Lindzen presents skeptics' case to UK House of Commons
Regarding Robert Socolow's idea that Lindzen's case may need more adequate
refutation:
Richard Kerr published an article in Science in 1989 describing
To: jrandomwin...@gmail.com; geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [geo] Re: Lindzen presents skeptics' case to UK House of Commons
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:07:57 +
Let me try again. Dick Lindzen has presented a science argument, to the
effect that one can infer the climate sensitivity
@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 7:07:40 AM
Subject: Re: [geo] Re: Lindzen presents skeptics' case to UK House of Commons
Although not widely distributed, I got so frustrated with an op-ed that
Lindzen was invited to submit to Newsweek several years ago that I put
together a point-by-point
for
truncating his full reply.
Ron
From: Mike MacCracken mmacc...@comcast.net
To: jrandomwin...@gmail.com, Geoengineering
Geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 7:07:40 AM
Subject: Re: [geo] Re: Lindzen presents skeptics' case to UK House of Commons
Although not widely
, March 2, 2012 2:52:37 PM
Subject: RE: [geo] Re: Lindzen presents skeptics' case to UK House of Commons
It is a sick use of the term to characterize someone who disagrees with the
magnitude and urgency of the situation as a denier. That is equivalent to
saying, I am right, I know best and anyone
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
rongretlar...@comcast.net
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 3:43 PM
To: mmacc...@comcast.net
Cc: jrandomwin...@gmail.com; Geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Re: Lindzen presents skeptics' case to UK House of
Commons
Prof. MacCracken
Of david
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:26 AM
To: geoengineering
Subject: [geo] Re: Lindzen presents skeptics' case to UK House of Commons
Regarding Robert Socolow's idea that Lindzen's case may need more adequate
refutation:
Richard Kerr published an article in Science in 1989 describing Lindzen's
[mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of david
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 10:37 AM
To: geoengineering
Subject: [geo] Re: Lindzen presents skeptics' case to UK House of Commons
Lindzen has asserted he does not like being called a skeptic because he
prefers that people call him a denier
: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
[mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of david
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 10:37 AM
To: geoengineering
Subject: [geo] Re: Lindzen presents skeptics' case to UK House of Commons
Lindzen has asserted he does not like being called a skeptic because he
10 matches
Mail list logo
