+1, I have some open PRs up-porting some fixes Boundless did for a
recent release, but they ran into Travis issues. Feel free to break
them and I'll deal with them next week.
On 2018-06-02 12:30 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> looks like the pull requests against GeoServer are not taking any
Title: Message Title
Torben Barsballe
Hi Andrea,
I tossed up a PR here: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2905
with a ticket https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-8779.
I am not seeing a quick way to provide a unit test. If you (or anyone)
has a suggestion on that front, I'm happy to include one.
Cheers,
Jim
Hi Jim,
yes, properly implemented collection wrappers should allow delegation
Cheers
Andrea
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Jim Hughes wrote:
> Andrea,
>
> Thanks for helping the PR through.
>
> I haven't tested out the first case completely. I've definitely run into
> the issue that Alvaro
Ah,
that change was controversial and the pull request sat there for ages
before being merged:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2664
(shows me as the author, but it's not really me, I'm just unwillingly
involved because nobody else would take action)
Please discuss.
Cheers
Andrea
Hi all,
While testing out GeoMesa with GeoServer 2.13.x, we ran into some issues
with the FeatureSizeFeatureCollection. I think there are two issues:
First, for a layers backed by a large volume of data, getCount returning
-1 is partially a way of saying that you don't want to count all the
Title: Message Title
Alessandro Parma
