Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] CITE testing for GeoServer release

2010-05-19 Thread Jody Garnett
No worries when you are closer to release let me know and I can help and/or talk through the steps for a GeoTools 2.6.5. I will take the mention of GeoServer off the release anouncements then... Jody On 19/05/2010, at 4:23 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > [Subject changed to avoid confusion.] >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] CITE testing for GeoServer release

2010-05-18 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
[Subject changed to avoid confusion.] Jody, I think you should go ahead with the GeoTools 2.6.4 release. You (wearing your GeoTools-release-master hat) have given us (GeoServer release master) a large window, and we should not hold up the GeoTools release any longer. We (the GeoServer develope

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] CITE testing for GeoServer 2.0.1

2010-05-18 Thread Jody Garnett
Difficult Ben; I have made and published uDig 1.2 based on GeoTools 2.6.4. Do you guys want to phone me to sort out options? I have finding you on IRC. Any ETA on fixes? Jody On 19/05/2010, at 3:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Jody, > > Victor has spotted that the CITE Hudson is giving fal

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] CITE testing for GeoServer 2.0.1

2010-05-18 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Jody, Victor has spotted that the CITE Hudson is giving false success notifications. There are still many failures. Should we check with Justin before you announce 2.6.4? Kind regards, Ben. On 19/05/10 10:31, v...@csiro wrote: > > My GeoServer 2.0.2 is pegged to 2.6.4 so I don't think there i

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] CITE testing for GeoServer 2.0.1

2010-05-18 Thread v...@csiro
My GeoServer 2.0.2 is pegged to 2.6.4 so I don't think there is a need for retagging? My knowledge in the release cycle is limited though hahah :) Jody Garnett-3 wrote: > > Question do I need to retag GeoTools 2.6.4 I have not package or announced > yet. > Jody > > On 18/05/2010, at 6:35 PM,

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] CITE testing for GeoServer 2.0.1

2010-05-18 Thread Jody Garnett
Question do I need to retag GeoTools 2.6.4 I have not package or announced yet. Jody On 18/05/2010, at 6:35 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Rini has fixed the problem that was causing the CITE failures > (GEOS-3969), and is sure it was caused by the change committed in 11 > December (GEOS-3553)

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] CITE testing for GeoServer 2.0.1

2010-05-18 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Rini has fixed the problem that was causing the CITE failures (GEOS-3969), and is sure it was caused by the change committed in 11 December (GEOS-3553). So we are wondering about GeoServer 2.0.1. On 18/05/10 15:30, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Mark, > > was CITE WFS 1.1.0 testing performed for th

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] CITE Testing

2010-05-12 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Victor, I think that is the same bundle that Rini mentioned in our internal Jira (SISS-317). Look in the email from Justin from November 2009, which contains: http://files.opengeo.org/tests.zip I think these are the droids you are looking for. Kind regards, Ben. On 13/05/10 12:05, v...@csiro