Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
On 19/03/10 22:22, Andrea Aime wrote:
during the NY OpenGeo code sprint last month we've designed
and coded support for what we call virtual tables, that
is, feature types that are defined via a straight, native
sql query.
Um, Andrea, did you just invent a
Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
This did occur to me - but I thought I'd stick with the first issue -
can we dump sql-datastore and also have user-defined native sql
procedures exposed as filter functions?
I did not look into the latter (exposing native sql procedures
as filter functions) but the
If I understand the concept, this feature will not add functionality.
The purpose is to make the statement more efficient
right ?
Andrea Aime writes:
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
For example:
SELECT id, name, url, ST_SetSRID(ST_Point(longitude, latitude),4326) as
location FROM
Christian Müller ha scritto:
If I understand the concept, this feature will not add functionality.
The purpose is to make the statement more efficient
right ?
Correct.
Though in fact in my mind it would make another class of usages
possible in practical terms (as opposed to possible in theory
Hmm
And how do you rewrite a query if the bbox param is missing ?
e.g
where st_area($bbox) 10
or
where anAttr = aValue or bbox expresion
or
where anAttr = aValue and bbox expresion
?
Andrea Aime writes:
Christian Müller ha scritto:
If I understand the concept,
Christian Müller ha scritto:
Hmm
And how do you rewrite a query if the bbox param is missing ?
e.g
where st_area($bbox) 10
or
where anAttr = aValue or bbox expresion
or
where anAttr = aValue and bbox expresion
?
That's why I enclosed the part with the bbox in { } and
said We
Yep, sounds good using {bbox}
At the moment I have the problem with tons of views in my database. The
virtual table concept could be a solution for this. If you like I would try
to deploy virtual tables in Geoserver 2.x
Is there anything preventing the patch to be applied to gt-2.6.x ?.
Is
Christian Müller ha scritto:
Yep, sounds good using {bbox}
At the moment I have the problem with tons of views in my database. The
virtual table concept could be a solution for this. If you like I would try
to deploy virtual tables in Geoserver 2.x
Is there anything preventing the patch to
Andrea, I applied the patch to 2.6.x and it works
About: {bbox}
We could create a JIRA issue (improvement)
About: geoserver integration.
Since I will use the virtual tables within a pregeneralized feature, I
create the virtual tables programmatically.
I think your headaches are caused by
This is a very good feature. IMHO, we should integrate it into trunk and 2.x
series a soon as possible.
Andrea Aime writes:
Hi,
during the NY OpenGeo code sprint last month we've designed
and coded support for what we call virtual tables, that
is, feature types that are defined via a
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Andrea Aime aa...@opengeo.org wrote:
Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
I see Gabriel is in the loop - this functionality sounds similar to
the sql-datastore module included in the 1.6 community-schemas
dependencies - can we get an analysis of how this new initiative
On 19/03/10 22:22, Andrea Aime wrote:
during the NY OpenGeo code sprint last month we've designed
and coded support for what we call virtual tables, that
is, feature types that are defined via a straight, native
sql query.
Um, Andrea, did you just invent a generic solution that supersedes the
This did occur to me - but I thought I'd stick with the first issue -
can we dump sql-datastore and also have user-defined native sql
procedures exposed as filter functions?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au wrote:
On 19/03/10 22:22, Andrea Aime
Hi,
during the NY OpenGeo code sprint last month we've designed
and coded support for what we call virtual tables, that
is, feature types that are defined via a straight, native
sql query.
If you cannot wait to see the code there is a patch attached
to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2123.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Andrea Aime aa...@opengeo.org wrote:
[... lots of cool stuff ...]
This sounds really cool Andrea, I'll see if I can test it out next
week before marking kicks in. I really wish I had known that the Java
tribe was going to the NY Sprint as I'd have come over,
Ian Turton ha scritto:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Andrea Aime aa...@opengeo.org wrote:
[... lots of cool stuff ...]
This sounds really cool Andrea, I'll see if I can test it out next
week before marking kicks in. I really wish I had known that the Java
tribe was going to the NY
16 matches
Mail list logo
