Re: [Geoserver-devel] Vote on GSIP 178

2019-10-10 Thread Nuno Oliveira
Great, thx for the feedback Andrea. On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 10:30 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > Been a week, has at least 30% +1 (between here and the votes in the > previous thread), at least 50% voted, no -1, thus, it's passed > according > to our regulations: > https://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/d

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Vote on GSIP 178

2019-10-10 Thread Andrea Aime
Been a week, has at least 30% +1 (between here and the votes in the previous thread), at least 50% voted, no -1, thus, it's passed according to our regulations: https://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/gsip.html#voting-on-a-gsip Cheers Andrea On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 11:04 PM Nuno Ol

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Vote on GSIP 178

2019-10-04 Thread Nuno Oliveira GeoSolutions
Hi Jody, thx for the feedback, done! On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:58 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > You tricked me, the text says GSIP-179 but the link goes to GSIP-179 :) > > The proposal is presented with two options, and then later down it shows a > third approach was implemented. Can we change that ar

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Vote on GSIP 178

2019-10-04 Thread Jody Garnett
You tricked me, the text says GSIP-179 but the link goes to GSIP-179 :) The proposal is presented with two options, and then later down it shows a third approach was implemented. Can we change that around so what is being voted on is more clear? * Proposal: We propose adding enabled and advertise

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Vote on GSIP 178

2019-10-04 Thread Nuno Oliveira GeoSolutions
Hi Andrea, Ian, thank you for the detailed feedback, proposal updated with your feedback: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-178 The pull request was amended accordingly, we moved the enabled and advertised to PublishInfo interface, and indeed it looks better aligned with GeoServer d

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Vote on GSIP 178

2019-10-04 Thread Ian Turton
-0 from me, I defer to Andrea's better understanding of the issues. Ian On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 09:35, Andrea Aime wrote: > Doh, starting over, got confused by the links. > > Sorry I could not participate much to the original discussion, the > proposal was sent during FOSS4G, and with the > build

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Vote on GSIP 178

2019-10-04 Thread Andrea Aime
Doh, starting over, got confused by the links. Sorry I could not participate much to the original discussion, the proposal was sent during FOSS4G, and with the build server still storming the devel list (I see I added a few comments, but I did not understand the proposal well) For this one, and w

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Vote on GSIP 178

2019-10-04 Thread Alessio Fabiani
I guess I already voted on this and even for the correct 178... however, just to be clear, yes, it looks to me a nice improvement. I confirm +1 Il giorno ven 4 ott 2019 alle ore 10:03 Andrea Aime < andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: > Hi Nuno, > works for me, +1 > > Just a note, the propos

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Vote on GSIP 178

2019-10-04 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Nuno, works for me, +1 Just a note, the proposal talks about displaying "time", but it's really a timestamp Cheers Andrea On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 11:04 PM Nuno Oliveira GeoSolutions < nuno.olive...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Dear PSC memebers, > > I would kindly ask you to cast a vote on: >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Vote on GSIP 178

2019-10-04 Thread Nuno Oliveira GeoSolutions
Fixing the typos and links (my apologies): Dear PSC members, I would kindly ask you to cast a vote on: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-178 This thread is for the voting process, the discussion thread is available here:

[Geoserver-devel] Vote on GSIP 178

2019-10-03 Thread Nuno Oliveira GeoSolutions
Dear PSC memebers, I would kindly ask you to cast a vote on: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-178 This thread is for the voting process, the discussion thread is available here: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GSIP-178-Ex