Difficult Ben;
I have made and published uDig 1.2 based on GeoTools 2.6.4.
Do you guys want to phone me to sort out options? I have finding you on IRC.
Any ETA on fixes?
Jody
On 19/05/2010, at 3:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Jody,
>
> Victor has spotted that the CITE Hudson is giving fal
Jody,
Victor has spotted that the CITE Hudson is giving false success
notifications. There are still many failures. Should we check with
Justin before you announce 2.6.4?
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 19/05/10 10:31, v...@csiro wrote:
>
> My GeoServer 2.0.2 is pegged to 2.6.4 so I don't think there i
My GeoServer 2.0.2 is pegged to 2.6.4 so I don't think there is a need for
retagging?
My knowledge in the release cycle is limited though hahah :)
Jody Garnett-3 wrote:
>
> Question do I need to retag GeoTools 2.6.4 I have not package or announced
> yet.
> Jody
>
> On 18/05/2010, at 6:35 PM,
Question do I need to retag GeoTools 2.6.4 I have not package or announced yet.
Jody
On 18/05/2010, at 6:35 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Rini has fixed the problem that was causing the CITE failures
> (GEOS-3969), and is sure it was caused by the change committed in 11
> December (GEOS-3553)
Rini has fixed the problem that was causing the CITE failures
(GEOS-3969), and is sure it was caused by the change committed in 11
December (GEOS-3553). So we are wondering about GeoServer 2.0.1.
On 18/05/10 15:30, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Mark,
>
> was CITE WFS 1.1.0 testing performed for th
