[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-10389) GeoServer EntityResolver for Parser and SLDParser

Jody Garnett ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=557058%3Ae422bb7f-4808-47e3-837f-13db0e6681e3 ) *created* an issue GeoServer ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiZjY1NTZjM2QxMzZmNDE0NjgxMTAyZjFiYzJkOWM3MzAiLCJwIjoiaiJ9 ) /

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-167 Log4j Update

+1 On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 2:49 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Thanks Jukka: > > The Feb 11th deadline (on the quote) was only so this activity could start > this week and not delay the 2.21-RC release. > > I am going to leave the proposal open for voting; and we can check in > during tomorrow’s PSC

[Geoserver-devel] GeoServer/GeoTools PMC Meeting at 18:30 CET / 9:30 PST tomorrow

Reminder that the next PMC meeting is scheduled for tomorrow, February 15, at 18:30 CET. Cheers, Torben ___ Geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-167 Log4j Update

Thanks Jukka: The Feb 11th deadline (on the quote) was only so this activity could start this week and not delay the 2.21-RC release. I am going to leave the proposal open for voting; and we can check in during tomorrow’s PSC meeting. Aside: I have nothing against logback, it is just not the

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-167 Log4j Update

Hi, My late +1 By the comparison http://www.java-logging.com/comparison/ I would have liked to see also a proposal for logback that by the feature table seems to be on the same line with log4j, but we do not have such proposal. -Jukka Rahkonen- Lähettäjä: Jody Garnett Lähetetty: maanantai

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-167 Log4j Update

GSIP-167 did not pass. So this proposal was not approved before the attached quite expired on Feb 11th. Please advise what you would like to do next. Jody On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 5:36 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Financial proposal provided and attached to >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Spotless formatting landed on all active branches

Hey, heads up to all using Windows... it seems that doing simply a "git reset --hard" is not upgrading the existing checkouts. However, a fresh checkout will work fine (that's what Brad tried, I also did not, works). The result on a old checkout is that Spotless finds files with wrong line endings