Re: [Geoserver-devel] Backporting monitoring improvement

Andrea I think this is a low risk change and would be in support of you back porting the change for the next release. -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 at 00:20, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:03 PM, Jody Garnett > wrote:

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Backporting monitoring improvement

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:03 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Catching up on email, the monitoring api is not heavily used so I am not > surprise at the lack of response. > I think that GeoSolution won't stand up any server without it installed :-p Yet, I understand, without a

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Backporting monitoring improvement

That sounds useful. Backport in due time is fine. Do you have a need for an earlier backport? How much earlier? 19 days or now? I have no objection if you have a need, but, as you note, it is an excursion from the rules. Kind regards, Ben. On 25/04/18 05:08, Andrea Aime wrote: Four days, no

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Backporting monitoring improvement

Catching up on email, the monitoring api is not heavily used so I am not surprise at the lack of response. I think as long as the addition is done in a way that does not break backwards compatibility doing a back port is fine. Do you have a pressing reason to ask for a back port sooner? Perhaps

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Backporting monitoring improvement

Four days, no answer, I guess nobody is particularly concerned. Not even with a backport sooner than the one month? Cheers Andrea On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I've recently committed on master an improvement on monitoring that