On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 4:17 AM, dapriett dprie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I setup a PostGIS data store and layer containing geometries created by
users. Based on the user accessing the layer, I would like to force a
filter within geoserver in order to only return features they own. Where
[Please keep discussions on-list]
Pu,
are your schemas in paths relative to the schemas/catalog.xml? Such as
data_dir/schemas/cgiutilities/ ? Does GeoServer still complain about
geosciml.org on startup?
I think you are missing several rewrite rules; I recommend one per host
so I count four.
On 17/07/13 14:30, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
I think you are missing several rewrite rules; I recommend one per host
so I count four.
Off-by-one: it is only three. I have attached a corresponding
catalog.xml; store your schemas under data_dir/schemas. Once you have
your schemas in this tree
Hi everybody,
I am using Postgresql/PostGIS database as datastore and I use App-schema
plugin to bring the data to INSPIRE-schema. I have a problem with larger
data sets with performance. When I do the WFS query with parameter count=1
for data set with 20 rows, it takes almost 20 seconds
Eero,
is your source table denormalised? That is, does it have multiple rows
for each feature? This may prevent efficient operation.
How long do your simple feature queries take if you use
startindex=0count=1 (this will trigger the sorting required for stable
paging)?
Note that app-schema
Hi Ben,
Thank you for the answer. The table is denormalised. The column I am using
as Id is table's primary key and unique. I have also indexed the table
according to that.
Inserting this startindex=0 to the query doesn't affect the query time.
The query time is almost the same (about 20
*I have a set of aerial imagery which I processed and made a pyramid and
they render fine except some of the images do not draw at all levels. Level
0 images do not draw in certain sections and the stack trace produced is
given below:*
2013-07-17 11:32:00,488 DEBUG [gce.imagemosaic] - Loading
Eero,
are you able to use normalised tables and feature chaining? Denormalised
tables will result in slower performance.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 17/07/13 18:04, Eero wrote:
Hi Ben,
Thank you for the answer. The table is denormalised. The column I am using
as Id is table's primary key and
Hi,
sorry, I misunderstood the term denormalised. In my table there are no
multiple rows for the each feature. Table is quite simple, every feature has
an own line and including some information for those (columns are: feature
id, name, area (in ha), geometry, date etc.). So I think it is
Jonathan,
Thanks! That was the missing piece of the puzzle. Works like a charm!
Regards,
Roel
Van: Jonathan Moules [mailto:jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk]
Verzonden: dinsdag 16 juli 2013 17:43
Aan: Roel De Nijs
CC: geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Onderwerp: Re: [Geoserver-users] SLD:
Hi,
I am using HGT data to serve raster elevation tiles. My aim is to serve
smooth over-sampled raster thanks to BarnesSurface transform.
Why BarnesSurfaces?
I've tried to set Publishing Interpolation Methods Default
Interpolation Method at layer level to bilinear or bicubic but this
parameter
Hello all,
We have asked the developers (Cadcorp) whether or not their Web Map Layers
product can comsume GeoWebCache (intergrated with GeoServer) cached tiles.
They replied...
...Web Map Layers will support two flavours of tile cache, Disk and
GoogleDisk. More information on both can be seen
does anybody know, can I retrieve by REST service in GeoServer an raster
representation of layer? Just like in for ex. ArcGIS REST Api:when I send:
Hi John,
Unfortunately I have some experience with CadCorp - I'd punt it back to
the support desk and ask them if they support the TMS 1.0.0, WTMS 1.0.0 or
WMS-C 1.1.1 OGC standards. These are are all supported by GeoServer. Their
adverts like to say they support OGC standards so I'd hope the
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Krystian pruszynski.kryst...@gmail.comwrote:
does anybody know, can I retrieve by REST service in GeoServer an raster
representation of layer? Just like in for ex. ArcGIS REST Api: when I send:
Hi Krystian,
That should be possible with a standard WMS request. For example the
following creates a PNG of our 1:50k OS raster:
thank you for quick replay.
Yes, i know I can do it via WMS interface, but this solution would need some
server-based coding for parsing XML response and so on... and my application
is pure JavaScript and I've just implemented REST API and just wondering how
to connect it to geoserver...
so if
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Krystian pruszynski.kryst...@gmail.comwrote:
thank you for quick replay.
Yes, i know I can do it via WMS interface, but this solution would need
some
server-based coding for parsing XML response and so on... and my
application
is pure JavaScript and I've
Is it possible to have the WellKnownName of a mark be dependent on a property
name (or using the recode filter function)? Based on a few experiments I think
it's not possible...
Volg Aquafin op Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/AquafinNV |
If it's possible, that would be really great for simplifying our 3000+ line
SLDs. One of the things I tried, was the following code but that doesn't work
WellKnownName
ogc:Function name=Recode
ogc:PropertyNamenode_type/ogc:PropertyName
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Roel De Nijs roel.den...@aquafin.bewrote:
Is it possible to have the WellKnownName of a mark be dependent on a
property name (or using the recode filter function)? Based on a few
experiments I think it’s not possible…
Hmm... no, it is actually possible.
Hi all
I've been successfully using a content.ftl template until a few days ago
when it suddenly stopped working. (footer.ftl and header.ftl are present
but are intentionally empty). Instead, GetFeatureInfo requests are being
returned with the default template and there is nothing obvious in
Dear John,
I second what Jonathan says, I am afraid those formats are kind of
proprietary, hence you'd need to push them to check support for OGC
standards.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jonathan Moules
jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk wrote:
I don't think GeoServer/GWC supports any other
Hi,
Is there a convention for added server-specific configuration (e.g., database
resources, etc.) without having to alter the WAR file?
I'm trying to do a deployment across a few headless Linux servers, and right
now, I have to replace the WEB-INF/config*.xml files. I'm able to do a
Hi Eero,
Geoff Williams is working on a solution for this issue, and I believe he is
close to finishing.
Watch this issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4510
Cheers
Rini
--
View this message in context:
25 matches
Mail list logo
