Re: [Geotools-devel] handling releases

2006-03-10 Thread Richard Gould
I've uploaded the 2.2.RC1 jars to http://lists.refractions.net/geotools/dist/2.2.RC1/gt2/jars I don't believe i have access to dist.geotools.org to upload them there. If so, how do I access it? WebDAV? Richard Chris Holmes wrote: Ian Turton wrote: On 3/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL

[Geotools-devel] Tiling Efficiency Comments Sought

2006-03-10 Thread Bryce L Nordgren
I don't think 19123 had a reference implementation. :) Synopsis: == The representation of gridded data in ISO19123 is a minimum of 175 times larger than the data it represents. (No joke: that is conservative.) The call "DiscreteGridPointCoverage.list().toArray()" on a 1000x1000 grid of

Re: [Geotools-devel] code formatting

2006-03-10 Thread Paul Ramsey
On Mar 10, 2006, at 2:11 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: I would like to format up 2.2.x when it is released, and then stick with it (aka format before every commit like the bad old days). Just to confirm for people, autoformatting would mean that the workflow would be: svn update svn comm

[Geotools-devel] code formatting

2006-03-10 Thread Jody Garnett
I know this is murder for a topic, but I would like to see us do something or nothing. I would like to format up 2.2.x when it is released, and then stick with it (aka format before every commit like the bad old days). -or- I would like us to change our developers guide to agree with actual p

[Geotools-devel] Re: 2.2.x Geotools branch (stable)

2006-03-10 Thread Jody Garnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I modified the Geotools homepage so it proudly announces 2.2.x as the stable branch. Um, then we should mark the next release as 2.2.0? I like my version numbers to indicate truth ;-) Lets wait for your geoserver tests to chime in (you have more extensive tests then u

Re: [Geotools-devel] handling releases

2006-03-10 Thread Chris Holmes
Ian Turton wrote: On 3/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ian, I think you can download the binary from sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=4091&package_id=95639&release_id=399190 (there's a link to this on 2.1.x wiki page) But then I ha

Re: [Geotools-devel] handling releases

2006-03-10 Thread Ian Turton
On 3/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ian,I think you can download the binary from sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=4091&package_id=95639&release_id=399190(there's a link to this on 2.1.x wiki page) But then I have to rename them all to fit into

[Geotools-devel] handling releases

2006-03-10 Thread dblasby
Ian, I think you can download the binary from sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=4091&package_id=95639&release_id=399190 (there's a link to this on 2.1.x wiki page) I thought the .jars would be here: http://lists.refractions.net/geotools/ but they are not. dave

[Geotools-devel] handling releases

2006-03-10 Thread Ian Turton
Thanks Dave for putting up the page on 2.2.x and 2.3.x. So I thought I'll update geovista studio to make use of the new stable jars. BUT I can't actually find a maven repository I can point my users to. The nearest was a reference to maven.geotools.fr but that's for maven 2 and I don't want to c

[Geotools-devel] 2.2.x Geotools branch (stable)

2006-03-10 Thread dblasby
I modified the Geotools homepage so it proudly announces 2.2.x as the stable branch. I also added two wiki pages - [2.2.x] and [2.3.x]. http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.2.x http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.3.x 2.2.x has some info about 2.2.x and what the plan for it is. It

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.2.x not building (shapefile)

2006-03-10 Thread dblasby
>This is a bit of a pain It passes fine on my windows box. I think it >is a configuration dependent or maybe speed dependent. I will see if > I can recreate the issue. I'm running on a Windows XP Laptop, which means the hard disk is a bit slow. Perhaps try copying a large set of files while run

[Geotools-devel] 2.2.x not building (shapefile)

2006-03-10 Thread dblasby
I'm just writing up documentation getting people to switch to 2.2, but I cannot get it building: - --- Testcase: testConcurrentReadWrite(org.geotools.data.shapefile.ShapefileReadWriteTest): Caused an ERROR C:\DOCUME~1\DAVIDB~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\test-shp4708

[Geotools-devel] Re: [Geotools-gt2-users] FilterFactory changes 2.1 - 2.2RC1

2006-03-10 Thread Jody Garnett
John Fletcher wrote: I am currently using GT 2.1.0 in a project, and make heavy use of the FilterFactory interface. I've noticed that there are some pretty big changes to this interface from 2.1 to 2.2 RC1 (deprecation of methods, disappearance of createFilterFactory method), and again some pret

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools Build Report [ 2006/03/09 23:55 ]

2006-03-10 Thread Paul Ramsey
GeoTools2 module build report 20060309 gt2:referencing cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357 gt2:sample-data cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357 gt2:coverage cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357 gt2:api cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357 gt2:main cleaned,