[Geotools-devel] applied patch to shapefile plugin

Hi, I've applied the patch provided by Oliver to the shapefile plugin. Hopefully people who had problems building it before will be able to build it now. Please let me know if it works. Jesse --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML,

[Geotools-devel] [CC-Trunk] geotools Build Failed

View results here -> http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20060327184643 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile

[Geotools-devel] So is this the mvn 2 bug?

Is this the bug you guys are talking about? I am very scared about running without test cases - I see they are turned off for 2.2.x :-( So as I understand thing we cannot release at this time: - maven 1 is not supported? - maven 2 does not run tests? Is there any way we can just turn off tests

[Geotools-devel] [CC-2.1.x] geotools-2.1.x Build Failed

View results here -> http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_2.1.x?log=log20060327152812 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile me

[Geotools-devel] 2.2.x and maven 2 and WorldImageWriterTest (plugin/image)

Folks told me to go to maven 2 for 2.2.x. I did, but I'm getting different errors. I have JAI installed. I verified that "com/sun/media/imageio/stream/FileChannelImageInputStream" is in "C:\j2sdk1.4.2_07\jre\lib\ext\jai_imageio.jar". Any idea whats wrong? dave -

[Geotools-devel] [CC-Trunk] geotools Build Failed

View results here -> http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20060327152356 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile

Re: [Geotools-devel] GEOT-393 GeometryConverter patch

Jody Garnett wrote: Any update on this Chris? It may be worth talking about in tonights meeting... - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-393 No, what it really needs is someone to take the lead on an informix datastore. This will provide a good start for them. Apart from that it's not all

Re: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning Andrea out of the System...

Apparently Jira really likes Andrea: - legend ---> drop? - arcgrid ---> simboss (only developer left on the plugin) - gtopo30 ---> simboss (again) - lite-rendering > Jesse. Simboss - if you are uncomfortable with the responsibility we leave this as unsupported Martin - I may of stuffed som

[Geotools-devel] Re: FeatureState revisited

Jody Garnett wrote: Justin Deoliveira wrote: Ok fair enough, so a couple of things that come out of this. Mostly just to ensure that I understand correctly. 1. When one of these things is created (an instance of FeatureType) and passed a FeatureCollectionType that type should inheirit from A

Re: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning Andrea out of the System...

Jody Garnett ha scritto: Since Andrea does not have time to work on geotools these days I am cleaning up the following issues: - GEOT-611 ImageLoader in LiteRenderer is static, not threadsafe - Jesse - GEOT-51

[Geotools-devel] Cleaning Andrea out of the System...

Since Andrea does not have time to work on geotools these days I am cleaning up the following issues: - GEOT-611 ImageLoader in LiteRenderer is static, not threadsafe - Jesse - GEOT-51

[Geotools-devel] Jira component assignment up to date...

After a full days work, I am pleased to report that component assignment is up to date in Jira. We of course still have unscheduled issues, but that is not such a problem. Indeed it probably reflects reality. Indeed some module maintainers may wish to change the issues in their module to reflect

[Geotools-devel] GEOT-393 GeometryConverter patch

Any update on this Chris? It may be worth talking about in tonights meeting... - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-393 I have created a new issue component in jira: for "data and jdbc" we have a number of things falling through the cracks as they get assigned to one jdbc datastore or anoth

[Geotools-devel] Re: [udig-devel] Three coding questions

Combe, Colin wrote: Adrian, yes, I think it's confusing too. Actually, my reading of the current geotools API is that FactoryFinder is deprecated and we're meant to be using org.geotools.factory.FactoryRegistry. I think that was for the implementation behind the individual FactoryFinder imple

[Geotools-devel] RE: [udig-devel] Three coding questions

Adrian, yes, I think it's confusing too. Actually, my reading of the current geotools API is that FactoryFinder is deprecated and we're meant to be using org.geotools.factory.FactoryRegistry. Anyway, a jiira was recently created for providing an implementation of GeoAPI's CommonFactory interface, h

[Geotools-devel] Re: [udig-devel] Oracle Module

Jody Garnett wrote: Hi Marc you are the oracle module maintainer, I am also CCing the geoserver and udig lists to give them an update. I have been chatting with you on and off the last while, but I need to do something public by way of getting our house in order. I have created a a page for

[Geotools-devel] Re: FeatureState revisited

Justin Deoliveira wrote: Ok fair enough, so a couple of things that come out of this. Mostly just to ensure that I understand correctly. 1. When one of these things is created (an instance of FeatureType) and passed a FeatureCollectionType that type should inheirit from AbstractFeatureCollect

[Geotools-devel] Re: FeatureState revisited

Ok fair enough, so a couple of things that come out of this. Mostly just to ensure that I understand correctly. 1. When one of these things is created (an instance of FeatureType) and passed a FeatureCollectionType that type should inheirit from AbstractFeatureCollectionType, or something that

[Geotools-devel] Re: FeatureState revisited

Justin Deoliveira wrote: Thanks Jody, this makes sense now. Another question. Should the derived attributes like bounds show up in a call to get() when someone wants a collection of all the attributes defined for the feature collection. Of course, that is kind of the point :-) It is one thin

[Geotools-devel] Re: [udig-devel] Three coding questions

Adrian Custer wrote: 3) uDig/Geotools: How do we use FactoryFinders? I'm kind of confused by all the Factories, FactoryBuilders and FactoryFinders around. It seems there are several FactoryFinders which means we have to find the Finders. Is there an explanation of what each of them do? Is the id

[Geotools-devel] Oracle Module

Hi Marc you are the oracle module maintainer, I am also CCing the geoserver and udig lists to give them an update. I have been chatting with you on and off the last while, but I need to do something public by way of getting our house in order. I have created a a page for the oracle module: -

[Geotools-devel] Re: FeatureState revisited

Thanks Jody, this makes sense now. Another question. Should the derived attributes like bounds show up in a call to get() when someone wants a collection of all the attributes defined for the feature collection. -Justin Jody Garnett wrote: Well my code review is not going to well - Justin ke

[Geotools-devel] FeatureState revisited

Well my code review is not going to well - Justin keeps asking, good, questions. For FeatureState implementation in 2.2.x I used the same horrible code that was already there that let you access the feature members as an attribtue called "features". This of course must die ... and with a new

[Geotools-devel] Expression Module

Hi again Cory, You are also the module maintainer on the Expression module, I have once again provided a page where you can take notes on the status. I indicated some of the upcoming changes from the 2.3.x branch, and tried to summarize your work in 2.2.x. Please review: - http://docs.codeha

[Geotools-devel] [GT-Trunk-Snapshot] geotools-snapshot Build Failed

View results here -> http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_snapshot?log=log20060326003202 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile

[Geotools-devel] [GT-Trunk-Snapshot] geotools-snapshot Build Failed

View results here -> http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_snapshot?log=log20060325003305 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile

[Geotools-devel] IP issues Oracle and ArcSDE ... resolved(ish)

Okay cool - thanks Gabriel. So we got two answers: - ESRI - a jar downloaded without a licensing restriction - we should try and find someone to talk to I guess? - Oracle - a problem, we need to either ask nice or pay $2k to be a partner Marc I understand that you would like to use the sdoapi.

Re: [Geotools-devel] IP issues Oracle and ArcSDE

On Saturday 25 March 2006 16:02, Jody Garnett wrote: > Hi Marc - module maintainer for Oracle > Gabriel - module maintainer for ArcSDE > > We have an interesting twist with the jars required for your modules to > build. The jars are not part of an open source project, and produced by > a commercial

Re: [Geotools-devel] SRTM

Hi clay, hi all, do you mind if we talk a bit about how to do implement it in the actual structure of geotools coverages. It is quite easy to write a coverage plugin, it is not as easy to write a *good* plugin. I have never taken a look at format of this data source but it would be interesting to u

[Geotools-devel] svn down?

getting the following back: Could not open the requested SVN filesystem --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and jo

[Geotools-devel] Re: [Geoapi-devel] Anonymous types

Justin Deoliveira wrote: Gabriel and I had a discussion about this before and I have run across it recently as well, the question of wether a type can be anonymous. The javadoc on ComplexTypeBuilder says name *must* be set before calling build(). I think we need to relax this restriction and a

[Geotools-devel] Re: [Geoapi-devel] FeatureType#isNillable() must go?

Justin Deoliveira wrote: The method isNillable() still remains on FeatureType. Pretty sure this was something that was missed on the move of isNillable() to descriptor? Just commited, a bunch of stuff. Update and grab me on the geotools chat. Jody -

[Geotools-devel] Anonymous types

Gabriel and I had a discussion about this before and I have run across it recently as well, the question of wether a type can be anonymous. The javadoc on ComplexTypeBuilder says name *must* be set before calling build(). I think we need to relax this restriction and allow people to have types

[Geotools-devel] FeatureType#isNillable() must go?

The method isNillable() still remains on FeatureType. Pretty sure this was something that was missed on the move of isNillable() to descriptor? -Justin -- Justin Deoliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Open Planning Project http://topp.openplans.org --

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools Build Report [ 2006/03/26 23:55 ]

GeoTools2 module build report 20060326 gt2:referencing cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2356 gt2:sample-data cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2356 gt2:coverage cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357 gt2:api cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357 gt2:main cleaned,

[Geotools-devel] 2.0.1 is dead

Nobody has even mentioned this for a year so I am removing it from Jira. The following issues were marked against this version: - WFS events - Postgis events - CRS access order (fixed) The following issues were requested as a fix for target: - GEOT-681