[Geotools-devel] 2.0.1 is dead

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Nobody has even mentioned this for a year so I am removing it from Jira. The following issues were marked against this version: - WFS events - Postgis events - CRS access order (fixed) The following issues were requested as a fix for target: - GEOT-681 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-681

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools Build Report [ 2006/03/26 23:55 ]

2006-03-27 Thread Paul Ramsey
GeoTools2 module build report 20060326 gt2:referencing cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2356 gt2:sample-data cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2356 gt2:coverage cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357 gt2:api cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357 gt2:main cleaned,

[Geotools-devel] FeatureType#isNillable() must go?

2006-03-27 Thread Justin Deoliveira
The method isNillable() still remains on FeatureType. Pretty sure this was something that was missed on the move of isNillable() to descriptor? -Justin -- Justin Deoliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Open Planning Project http://topp.openplans.org

[Geotools-devel] Anonymous types

2006-03-27 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Gabriel and I had a discussion about this before and I have run across it recently as well, the question of wether a type can be anonymous. The javadoc on ComplexTypeBuilder says name *must* be set before calling build(). I think we need to relax this restriction and allow people to have

[Geotools-devel] Re: [Geoapi-devel] FeatureType#isNillable() must go?

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Justin Deoliveira wrote: The method isNillable() still remains on FeatureType. Pretty sure this was something that was missed on the move of isNillable() to descriptor? Just commited, a bunch of stuff. Update and grab me on the geotools chat. Jody

[Geotools-devel] Re: [Geoapi-devel] Anonymous types

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Justin Deoliveira wrote: Gabriel and I had a discussion about this before and I have run across it recently as well, the question of wether a type can be anonymous. The javadoc on ComplexTypeBuilder says name *must* be set before calling build(). I think we need to relax this restriction and

Re: [Geotools-devel] IP issues Oracle and ArcSDE

2006-03-27 Thread Gabriel Roldán
On Saturday 25 March 2006 16:02, Jody Garnett wrote: Hi Marc - module maintainer for Oracle Gabriel - module maintainer for ArcSDE We have an interesting twist with the jars required for your modules to build. The jars are not part of an open source project, and produced by a commercial

[Geotools-devel] IP issues Oracle and ArcSDE ... resolved(ish)

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Okay cool - thanks Gabriel. So we got two answers: - ESRI - a jar downloaded without a licensing restriction - we should try and find someone to talk to I guess? - Oracle - a problem, we need to either ask nice or pay $2k to be a partner Marc I understand that you would like to use the

[Geotools-devel] [GT-Trunk-Snapshot] geotools-snapshot Build Failed

2006-03-27 Thread jrm33
View results here - http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_snapshot?log=log20060325003305 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile

[Geotools-devel] [GT-Trunk-Snapshot] geotools-snapshot Build Failed

2006-03-27 Thread jrm33
View results here - http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_snapshot?log=log20060326003202 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile

[Geotools-devel] Expression Module

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi again Cory, You are also the module maintainer on the Expression module, I have once again provided a page where you can take notes on the status. I indicated some of the upcoming changes from the 2.3.x branch, and tried to summarize your work in 2.2.x. Please review: -

[Geotools-devel] FeatureState revisited

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Well my code review is not going to well - Justin keeps asking, good, questions. For FeatureState implementation in 2.2.x I used the same horrible code that was already there that let you access the feature members as an attribtue called features. This of course must die ... and with a new

[Geotools-devel] Re: FeatureState revisited

2006-03-27 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Thanks Jody, this makes sense now. Another question. Should the derived attributes like bounds show up in a call to get() when someone wants a collection of all the attributes defined for the feature collection. -Justin Jody Garnett wrote: Well my code review is not going to well - Justin

[Geotools-devel] Oracle Module

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Marc you are the oracle module maintainer, I am also CCing the geoserver and udig lists to give them an update. I have been chatting with you on and off the last while, but I need to do something public by way of getting our house in order. I have created a a page for the oracle module: -

[Geotools-devel] Re: FeatureState revisited

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Justin Deoliveira wrote: Ok fair enough, so a couple of things that come out of this. Mostly just to ensure that I understand correctly. 1. When one of these things is created (an instance of FeatureType) and passed a FeatureCollectionType that type should inheirit from

[Geotools-devel] Re: [udig-devel] Oracle Module

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Jody Garnett wrote: Hi Marc you are the oracle module maintainer, I am also CCing the geoserver and udig lists to give them an update. I have been chatting with you on and off the last while, but I need to do something public by way of getting our house in order. I have created a a page for

[Geotools-devel] RE: [udig-devel] Three coding questions

2006-03-27 Thread Combe, Colin
Adrian, yes, I think it's confusing too. Actually, my reading of the current geotools API is that FactoryFinder is deprecated and we're meant to be using org.geotools.factory.FactoryRegistry. Anyway, a jiira was recently created for providing an implementation of GeoAPI's CommonFactory interface,

[Geotools-devel] Re: [udig-devel] Three coding questions

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Combe, Colin wrote: Adrian, yes, I think it's confusing too. Actually, my reading of the current geotools API is that FactoryFinder is deprecated and we're meant to be using org.geotools.factory.FactoryRegistry. I think that was for the implementation behind the individual FactoryFinder

[Geotools-devel] GEOT-393 GeometryConverter patch

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Any update on this Chris? It may be worth talking about in tonights meeting... - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-393 I have created a new issue component in jira: for data and jdbc we have a number of things falling through the cracks as they get assigned to one jdbc datastore or

[Geotools-devel] Jira component assignment up to date...

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
After a full days work, I am pleased to report that component assignment is up to date in Jira. We of course still have unscheduled issues, but that is not such a problem. Indeed it probably reflects reality. Indeed some module maintainers may wish to change the issues in their module to reflect

[Geotools-devel] Cleaning Andrea out of the System...

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Since Andrea does not have time to work on geotools these days I am cleaning up the following issues: - GEOT-611 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-611 ImageLoader in LiteRenderer is static, not threadsafe http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-611 - Jesse - GEOT-51

Re: [Geotools-devel] Cleaning Andrea out of the System...

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Apparently Jira really likes Andrea: - legend --- drop? - arcgrid --- simboss (only developer left on the plugin) - gtopo30 --- simboss (again) - lite-rendering Jesse. Simboss - if you are uncomfortable with the responsibility we leave this as unsupported Martin - I may of stuffed

[Geotools-devel] [CC-Trunk] geotools Build Failed

2006-03-27 Thread jrm33
View results here - http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20060327152356 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile

[Geotools-devel] 2.2.x and maven 2 and WorldImageWriterTest (plugin/image)

2006-03-27 Thread David Blasby
Folks told me to go to maven 2 for 2.2.x. I did, but I'm getting different errors. I have JAI installed. I verified that com/sun/media/imageio/stream/FileChannelImageInputStream is in C:\j2sdk1.4.2_07\jre\lib\ext\jai_imageio.jar. Any idea whats wrong? dave

[Geotools-devel] [CC-2.1.x] geotools-2.1.x Build Failed

2006-03-27 Thread jrm33
View results here - http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_2.1.x?log=log20060327152812 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile

[Geotools-devel] So is this the mvn 2 bug?

2006-03-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Is this the bug you guys are talking about? I am very scared about running without test cases - I see they are turned off for 2.2.x :-( So as I understand thing we cannot release at this time: - maven 1 is not supported? - maven 2 does not run tests? Is there any way we can just turn off tests

[Geotools-devel] [CC-Trunk] geotools Build Failed

2006-03-27 Thread jrm33
View results here - http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20060327184643 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile

[Geotools-devel] applied patch to shapefile plugin

2006-03-27 Thread Jesse Eichar
Hi, I've applied the patch provided by Oliver to the shapefile plugin. Hopefully people who had problems building it before will be able to build it now. Please let me know if it works. Jesse --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by