Re: [Geotools-devel] Do we want a component based web framework or not?

2006-08-09 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Hi all, > I'm raising this question before starting to spend any time on a > wicket/facelets proof > of concept. > Wrong mailing list again! Boys I do need some holidays... Sorry Andrea - Using To

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Reopened: (GEOT-913) JMapPane should using just one mapcontext

2006-08-09 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-913?page=all ] Andrea Aime reopened GEOT-913: -- Assignee: Andrea Aime (was: Ian Turton) Reopening for handling in 2.3.x timeframe > JMapPane should using just one mapcontext > --

Re: [Geotools-devel] Too late for 2.2.0 ?

2006-08-09 Thread Andrea Aime
Richard Gould ha scritto: > Are you positive? I have not seen any commits on that section of the > code since the issue is report (except two small commits from andrea). > Adrian, are you able to test and verify if the problem still exists? > > I've fixed the frame closing problem (closing Map

[Geotools-devel] Do we want a component based web framework or not?

2006-08-09 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, I'm raising this question before starting to spend any time on a wicket/facelets proof of concept. Do we want to go the road of component based web frameworks or not? Please do speak up frankly. Going component based means a wholly different way of thinking about the web page, session

[Geotools-devel] Filter encoding issues

2006-08-09 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi all, Some recent development on geotools 2.2.x has caused filter encoding to go bad and as a result is making geoserver cite tests fail, which means we cant release. After three hours of bug hunting i have found the following bugs: 1. FilterCapabilties being wiped out by a negative bit mask (

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-917) Merge SQLEncoderPostgisGeos into SQLEncoderPostgis

2006-08-09 Thread Cory Horner (JIRA)
Merge SQLEncoderPostgisGeos into SQLEncoderPostgis -- Key: GEOT-917 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-917 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: data postgis

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Weirdness in SQLEncoder.java in 2.2.x?

2006-08-09 Thread Cory Horner
Chris Holmes wrote: > They were made to be Filter.ALL and Filter.NONE. They're static > singleton constructs I think off the Filter main class. > > They should be really easy to implement, and I'd say you should just > implement them, you just have to do a query as if there was no filter, > and

Re: [Geotools-devel] Too late for 2.2.0 ?

2006-08-09 Thread Richard Gould
Are you positive? I have not seen any commits on that section of the code since the issue is report (except two small commits from andrea). Adrian, are you able to test and verify if the problem still exists? Cheers Richard Ian Turton wrote: > On 8/9/06, Richard Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [Geotools-devel] Too late for 2.2.0 ?

2006-08-09 Thread Ian Turton
On 8/9/06, Richard Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There was a fatal mappane problem, so I am going to roll back the 2.2.0 > release. It looks like it hasn't been resolved yet, so you still have > some time. I will send out an email when I start the process again and > declare a code freeze. I'

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-916) FilterCapabilities ALL and NONE use ambiguous 12345 and -12345 as FilterType

2006-08-09 Thread Cory Horner (JIRA)
FilterCapabilities ALL and NONE use ambiguous 12345 and -12345 as FilterType Key: GEOT-916 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-916 Project: GeoTools Issue Typ

Re: [Geotools-devel] Too late for 2.2.0 ?

2006-08-09 Thread Richard Gould
There was a fatal mappane problem, so I am going to roll back the 2.2.0 release. It looks like it hasn't been resolved yet, so you still have some time. I will send out an email when I start the process again and declare a code freeze. Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there a code fre

Re: [Geotools-devel] geoapi's sphericalCS

2006-08-09 Thread Bryce L Nordgren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/09/2006 06:37:25 AM: > Hey all, perhaps especially Martin, > > > In looking at the code of the interface > > http://geoapi.sourceforge. > net/snapshot/javadoc/org/opengis/referencing/cs/SphericalCS.html > and perhaps this is the current form: > http://svn.sourceforg

[Geotools-devel] Too late for 2.2.0 ?

2006-08-09 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi all, Is there a code freeze on 2.2.0 yet? Some recent changes have broken GeoServer cite tests, so I need a few bug fixes in before I can release GeoServer If its too late to get into 2.2.0 I would like to release a 2.2.1 release candidate soon. -Justin -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning

Re: [Geotools-devel] WKB4J package

2006-08-09 Thread Chris Holmes
Do we have a wkb4j module? Like did we actually fork the existing wkb4j yet? I'm not against doing so, as its been dead for years. It'd be great if you could fix the tomcat deployment problems. best regards, Chris Alessio Fabiani wrote: Hi guys, how about the WKB4J module? Did you remeber

[Geotools-devel] Any plan to add static fields, like MERCATOR, to DefaultProjectedCRS?

2006-08-09 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, In trying to get a projected map for my QuickStart tutorial, I'd like to simply grab an existing object. By default the geotools DefaultMapContext is created with CoordinateReferenceSystem crs = DefaultGeographicCRS.WGS84; I'd like to change that with myMapCtxt.crs = DefaultProjec

[Geotools-devel] geoapi's sphericalCS

2006-08-09 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, perhaps especially Martin, In looking at the code of the interface http://geoapi.sourceforge.net/snapshot/javadoc/org/opengis/referencing/cs/SphericalCS.html and perhaps this is the current form: http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/geoapi/trunk/geoapi/src/main/java/org/opengis/referencing

[Geotools-devel] a rename request for 2.2.0

2006-08-09 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, Would the following rename be possible? org.geotools.referencing.CRS.transform(...) to org.geotools.referencing.CRS.getMathTransform(...) since we are not, in any way, transforming with the method. --adrian -

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.2.0 javdocs still reference the wrong GeoAPI

2006-08-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Andrea Aime a écrit : > Well, I have generated aggregated javadocs and noticed no problem, but > did not any about problems with custom taglets. > Martin, can you point me to the custom taglet that was failing? There is an example of the output I was trying to get: http://javadoc.geotools.fr/sn

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.2.0 javdocs still reference the wrong GeoAPI

2006-08-09 Thread Andrea Aime
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > Adrian Custer a écrit : >> I thought Martin had fixed this but perhaps that was only on trunk. > > I believe I made only a patch specific to the 2.2-RC4 release. I will do that > again for 2.2.0. > Actually the javadoc generation need to be revisited in order to

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.2.0 javdocs still reference the wrong GeoAPI

2006-08-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Adrian Custer a écrit : > I thought Martin had fixed this but perhaps that was only on trunk. I believe I made only a patch specific to the 2.2-RC4 release. I will do that again for 2.2.0. Actually the javadoc generation need to be revisited in order to get ride of our custom plugin and uses t

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering upside down

2006-08-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Adrian Custer a écrit : > One of the old renderers allowed one to rotate the view using the mouse > or keyboard. Does anyone know how this was done? I presume this was not > a change of CRS on the renderer's context but that there was an extra > affine transform in the rendering toolchain. Is this

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.2.0 release: I want my SDK!

2006-08-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Adrian Custer a écrit : > Can't our magical Maven2 do some extra work for us? Can't it package up > the mother of all tarballs? Is this hard, not attempted or frowned upon > for some reason? It was just not attempted as far as I known. I don't know if Maven "assembly" plugin do this kind of job,

Re: [Geotools-devel] IP coverage - darn left this one for martin

2006-08-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Jody Jody Garnett a écrit : > If I get a break to day I will take a run at this, if you have time to > be on IRC today we can do it together. I know you addressed most of the > issues via email, writing that down into a review.txt will be most of > the work. I missed yours email yesterda

Re: [Geotools-devel] GSIP#2, code formatting

2006-08-09 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Hi all, > so, how are doing with GSIP#2? > I see 4 official votes on the GSIP#2 page. > > I can hunt the old jalopy code formatting file, eventually remove the javadocs > reformat options (since they have a nasty tendency to break jalopy), add > jalopy > to the build and

[Geotools-devel] GSIP#2, code formatting

2006-08-09 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, so, how are doing with GSIP#2? I see 4 official votes on the GSIP#2 page. I can hunt the old jalopy code formatting file, eventually remove the javadocs reformat options (since they have a nasty tendency to break jalopy), add jalopy to the build and do the big reformat during the weekend w

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools Provenance Review updated

2006-08-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > You can find the updated provenance review here: > - http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/GeoTools_Provenance_Review Just a slight comment about "Contact EPSG Providers". The text said: "Frank was kind enough to contact the providers of the EPSG dataset and inform them of our

[Geotools-devel] WKB4J package

2006-08-09 Thread Alessio Fabiani
Hi guys, how about the WKB4J module? Did you remeber that there was a little problem on the JAR creation, which is not deployable by Tomcat? If you agree I can try to solve this problem and see if more improvements can be done to the package. Thanks.-- -

Re: [Geotools-devel] IP Review of referencing3D compelted

2006-08-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > Referencing3D checks out okay, wanted to confirm the origion of the > EGM180.nor data included in the module (suspect should fall under the > same nasa credit?) Yes, EGM180.nor is derived from http://earth-info.nima.mil/GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/ as well. I will update the

Re: [Geotools-devel] IP Referencing: Use of ResourceCompileter for org.geotools.resources.il8n

2006-08-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > I have updated the org.geotools.resources.ResourceCompiler to include > the current header > in the generated code. Rather then run again and mess with things right > now I though I should > ask if we can generate up code at maven build time (like is done with > JavaCC f

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-915) ResourceCompiler should be refactored as a Maven plugin

2006-08-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux (JIRA)
ResourceCompiler should be refactored as a Maven plugin --- Key: GEOT-915 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-915 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Task Components: core referen

Re: [Geotools-devel] Intereresting code I did not know was there (found during the IP review ; -)

2006-08-09 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Martin, good to have you back on board. About the resources package, I have a suggestion. I added a very simple class to do LRU caching of hard references. THe name is something like LRULinkedHashMap. I noticed that very often the caches you use in the referencing package are based on weak re

Re: [Geotools-devel] Intereresting code I did not know was there (found during the IP review ; -)

2006-08-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > - Arguments - yet another command processor for static main( String args[] ) At the time I wrote this one, I was not aware of existing tools like the ones below: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/cli/ https://args4j.dev.java.net/ I don't know which one is best -

Re: [Geotools-devel] IP Referencing: DatumAliasTable.txt, assume this is our data product here?

2006-08-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > Hi Martin, I am guessing that the DatumAliasesTable.txt is (C) 2005 PMC > (on the ground that DataAliases.java shared that date), please correct > if wrong. I think you are right. We could also add (C) Refraction Research since Paul is the author of this file if my mem