Hi,
I am using the ShapefileRenderer to render a shapefile based on an SLD
that uses two rules (one is the complement of the other) which use an
attribute expression.
The ShapefileRenderer code seems to be incorrectly interpreting this. In
createFeature() it reads the values, but uses the first
I am going to start on the work now but will not commit until votes are
in. If you really want something changed let me know early :-)
-
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Provide+common+parsers+in+a+consistent+fashion
Thanks to everyone for feedback in todays meeting.
Cheers,
Jody
>>IRC Meeting - 19 March 2007
>>Last changed: Mar 19, 2007 16:04 by Richard Gould
>>1: logging
>>2: nojai build
>>3: quick announcements
>>4: parser proposal
>>5: OGR data store
>>
>>chorner: 1) what is up?
>>jgarnett: fine ...
>>
>>IRC Meeting - 12 March 2007
>>Last changed: Mar 12, 2007 15:57 by
Oh I see - scary!
Jody
> as the log simply gets longer...
>
> IRC Meeting - 19 March 2007
> Last changed: Mar 19, 2007 16:04 by Richard Gould
> 1: logging
> 2: nojai build
> 3: quick announcements
> 4: parser proposal
> 5: OGR data store
>
> chorner: 1) what is up?
> jgarnett: fine ...
>
> IRC Mee
as the log simply gets longer...
IRC Meeting - 19 March 2007
Last changed: Mar 19, 2007 16:04 by Richard Gould
1: logging
2: nojai build
3: quick announcements
4: parser proposal
5: OGR data store
chorner: 1) what is up?
jgarnett: fine ...
IRC Meeting - 12 March 2007
Last changed: Mar 12, 2007
I just checked (since I missed part of the meeting) and everything
looked okay to me ... can you select "News Information" and confirm the
following:
title: IRC Meeting - 19 March 2007
author: Anonymous, Mar 19, 2007
Last Changed by: Richard Gould, Mar 19, 2007
> A log is going up to the websit
A log is going up to the website but it's a repeat and doesn't match the
topics, viz. last week's log, this week's log. --adrian
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and y
There should actually be three definitions. The official one that got
added recently (3005), the one Cubewerx made up (42102) and the one ESRI
made up (102190).
P
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I just noticed we have two codes for the BC Albers projection,
>> 3005, and 42
Hi all,
I have supplied another patch for ExpressionDOMParser attached to this
issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-969
The patch adds support for multi geometries, and fixes some whitespace
handling problems. If someone wants to look over before i commit that
would be peachy.
Thanks,
When trying to read images using gt2-image with jai and jai
image i/o in the path, but no native libs around, I get
the following:
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: javax.imageio.IIOException: I/O
error reading PNG header!
at
com.sun.media.jai.imageioimpl.ImageReadCRIF.create(ImageR
Per list suggestion, here's a page summarizing thoughts on SQLEncoder
porting-to-geoapi-filters questions.
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/SQLEncoder+Upgrade+to+GeoAPI+Filters
If you're interested/care, please peruse and let me know what you think about
package/class renaming. I'll
Sounds great Andrea;
You (of all people) know the drill; make a wiki page as a child of
unsupported (so it gets listed in the module matrix)
- create the module in svn and so on ...
What has changed last time is the profiles in unsupported/pom.xml - you
will find a profile
you can add your modu
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
>>> up to 1 MB. Merging them into main concerns me quite a bit.
>> Agreeed; it would be merged into "xml" (possible with child modules
>> if I understand Justin), main is big enough already (are you going to
>> write up a proposal for changing what code goes where? You
I kind ok liked both the same ... can you write one of them up on the
proposal page :-)
Oh here I will do it ... in general if you see a gap like this modify
the page and lets move on :-) If it is something worth discussion (like
this is, we can talk about it in email).
The v1_0 makes me sad -
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
>>> up to 1 MB. Merging them into main concerns me quite a bit.
>> Agreeed; it would be merged into "xml" (possible with child modules
>> if I understand Justin), main is big enough already (are you going to
>> write up a proposal for changing what code goes where? You
>
> So what is your package naming conventions?
Are you asking now? I dont really have one. the one in the proposal is
good, but does not take versions into account. The comment i made lists
two possibilities.
>
> Cheers,
> Jody
>
>>> We are not; can you read and comment on the proposal pleas
Ha ha; my bad - you left a comment about xml package naming on the wiki
- for reference we tract the discussion on the JIRA item .. and always
update the page
to reflect our current thoughts. Yes that is insane; yes if you can
think of a better way we can do it.
Jody
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
Thanks Justin; I do apologize if the focus of the proposal was not clear.
To be clear - I need to get a WKT parser in, and promised to find a home
for CQL as well. As long as it is being done I would like to match your
package naming conventions for your xml parsers.
So what is your package nam
Congrats Andrea - you have been wanting that one for a long time. Need I
ask if the developers guide has been updated?
Jody
> Hi all,
> I've just committed a profile that enables a gt2 build
> without JAI installed in the JRE.
>
> To try it out, arm yourself with a JDK/JRE couple without
> JAI ins
>> up to 1 MB. Merging them into main concerns me quite a bit.
> Agreeed; it would be merged into "xml" (possible with child modules if I
> understand Justin), main is big enough already (are you going to write
> up a proposal for changing what code goes where? You started an email
> discussion
> We are not; can you read and comment on the proposal please.
>
Sure, proposal updated with comments about packing naming structure with
regard to version numbers.
>
> !DSPAM:4007,45fec2fb232381362196140!
>
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org
-
Bad Jody - wrong list!
(see Andrea it is not just you).
Jody
> Hi Joachim:
>
> Let me answer your email inline.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hy Jody
>>
>> thank you for your great work on Postgis and Geoserver that brings great
>> ideas one more time to Europe from your nice country Canada.
I am showing up at 1 PST; and ignoring daylight savings time.
Jody
> Hey all,
>
> What time is the weekly meeting? IOW whose 'daylight savings' do we
> follow? The new US (?Canada) or the EU?
>
> --adrian
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>> The new XML SLD, GML2, GML3 and filter parser are huge bad beasts,
>> their jars sum up to 700kb, whilst the current main module sums
>> up to 1 MB. Merging them into main concerns me quite a bit
> Are we talking about rolling it into main? I am against this if this is
>
Hi Andrea - as always your feedback is fun (and blunt! Sorry that
should be honest :-D )
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Hi Mauricio & Justin,
>>
>> Both of you have asked about moving stuff around in the last couple
>> of months, and I am finally writing up a proposal so we can do the
>> work. R
Hi Joachim:
Let me answer your email inline.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hy Jody
>
> thank you for your great work on Postgis and Geoserver that brings great
> ideas one more time to Europe from your nice country Canada.
>
> I am writing to you cause I am a bit stuck on my workflow to set up a la
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> I just noticed we have two codes for the BC Albers projection,
> 3005, and 42102, the first coming from the official EPSG
> database, the latter coming from the epsg extensions module.
> Why is it so? Definition looks like being more or less identical...
Andrea,
This is
Hi,
thanks for bringing this up.
I think there is an easier way to fix this problem. The Testdata class
allows to create temporary files inside the test-data directory instead of
inside the default temporary directory. This way everytime one issues a mvn
clean everything the tests created gets wip
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>
>> Tomcat developers noticed the same issue and it seems they do have
>> a solution:
>> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/logging.html
>>
>> See the JULI logger, apparently it can load a logging.properties
Hi,
I just noticed we have two codes for the BC Albers projection,
3005, and 42102, the first coming from the official EPSG
database, the latter coming from the epsg extensions module.
Why is it so? Definition looks like being more or less identical...
PROJCS["BC_Albers",
GEOGCS["GCS_North_Ame
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>
> Tomcat developers noticed the same issue and it seems they do have
> a solution:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/logging.html
>
> See the JULI logger, apparently it can load a logging.properties file
> too
> (http://tomcat.apache
LikeFilterImpl does not conform to OGC spec
---
Key: GEOT-1203
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1203
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core filter
Affects Versions: 2
Hi,
today I tried out latest Martin improvements in parsing broken Oracle
WKT specs.
Well, it works for GEOGCS types (hurray for Martin) but unfortunately
not for projected ones (thumbs down for Oracle). The issue is, they do
use projection identifiers that do not conform to the
EPSG database. For
Hi all,
I've just committed a profile that enables a gt2 build
without JAI installed in the JRE.
To try it out, arm yourself with a JDK/JRE couple without
JAI installed, and run
mvn clean install -Pnojai
The profile, defined in the main pom, adds a global dependency
on the required JAI jars, with
Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> Andrea,
>
> this means 9:00 real EU time works for you but 10:00 EU doesn't.
Confused. Deja vu, too.
I mean 21.00 Rome time works, and it would work 22:00 too, but not 20:00.
As far as I understand, if we switched to US time savings, the meeting
would be at 20:00 Rome
Andrea,
this means 9:00 real EU time works for you but 10:00 EU doesn't.
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:06 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > What time is the weekly meeting? IOW whose 'daylight savings' do we
> > follow? The new US (?Canada) or the EU?
>
> No
Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> Hey all,
>
> What time is the weekly meeting? IOW whose 'daylight savings' do we
> follow? The new US (?Canada) or the EU?
Not sure, but I think the EU one, and it's my fault (I cannot
participate to the meeting otherwise). Anyways, I don't want
to be a blocker in gt2
Hey all,
What time is the weekly meeting? IOW whose 'daylight savings' do we
follow? The new US (?Canada) or the EU?
--adrian
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and yo
38 matches
Mail list logo
