[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-1209) memoryPreloadingEnabled throws exception with Postgis

2007-03-23 Thread Miguel Angel Vega Pabon (JIRA)
memoryPreloadingEnabled throws exception with Postgis - Key: GEOT-1209 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1209 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: core filter

Re: [Geotools-devel] Class name for geometry implementation?

2007-03-23 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Martin: The implementation in unsupported/geometry is fine - it looks like it will handle any CoordinateReferenceSystem at the end of the day. This is my first time in that code base (for some reason I thought you were keep tack of it? Or helping? or something ). The implementation (as menti

[Geotools-devel] Class name for geometry implementation?

2007-03-23 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Since Jody is working on geometries, I have a little naming topic. Most classes in module/unsupported/geometry end with the "Impl" suffix. I wonder: what at the restriction in usage of this implementation, if any? For example: * Is module/unsupported/geometry implementation limited to the 2D ca

[Geotools-devel] Google Summer of Code -- 1 day left!

2007-03-23 Thread Cory Horner
Students -- The GeoTools project has received very few submissions for the summer of code. Anyone submitting a thorough application is likely to be accepted (woot! summer job). One day left! Cheers, Cory. > A heads up to any students out there: applications for the Google > Summer of Code clo

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoapi-devel] Poor preformance forced on DirectPositionImpl by GeoAPI interface definition

2007-03-23 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > The description indicates that the returned double[] *is* the sequence > of numbers that hold the coordinates of this position > The @return indicates that this is "a copy of the coordinates" > > Based on your email I will revise the javadocs to indicate a copy is > used

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bit of trouble on trunk (sorry)

2007-03-23 Thread Cory Horner
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Jody Garnett a écrit : > >>Apparently it is not just me - Identifier.getVersion() has been removed >>from GeoAPI (along with VERSION_KEY). > > I have not yet looked at the GeoAPI changes. But it seems to me that > Identifier.getVersion() and VERSION_KEY should be @d

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoapi-devel] Poor preformance forced on DirectPositionImpl by GeoAPI interface definition

2007-03-23 Thread Jody Garnett
Aside - here is the conflicting javadocs for getCoordinates(); > * Returns the sequence of numbers that hold the coordinate of this > * position in its reference system. > * > * @return A copy of the coordinates. Changes in the returned > array will not be reflected > *

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoapi-devel] Poor preformance forced on DirectPositionImpl by GeoAPI interface definition

2007-03-23 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Jody Garnett a écrit : >> Reading for an array of ordinates is done way more often; it is okay >> to specify the array returned is not to be edited - but forcing it to >> be a copy every time is a bit painful. > My assumption was that reading would be performed by > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools Geomedia datastore license

2007-03-23 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Paul - I do think I heard back from Julian - but I was only doing a quick review (it was Julian's responsibility to update the file). Let me see if I can find his email, cut and paste it into the review.txt and carry on with life. Jody Paul, Michael wrote: > Hi Jody, > > I am currently inv

[Geotools-devel] 2.3.x in deep freeze (pretty please...)

2007-03-23 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, we're releasing Geoserver 1.5.0rc3 which references current geotools 2.3.x branch. If all goes well, we'd like to release the current 2.3.x as 2.3.1 and turn gs 1.5.0rc3 into gs 1.5.0 final. So, can I ask everybody to hold commits on the 2.3.x branch for a week? :-) Sorry I did not warn you be

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoapi-devel] Poor preformance forced on DirectPositionImpl by GeoAPI interface definition

2007-03-23 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > Reading for an array of ordinates is done way more often; it is okay to > specify the array returned is not to be edited - but forcing it to be a > copy every time is a bit painful. My assumption was that reading would be performed by DirectPosition.getOrdinate(i)

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geotools-gt2-users] Building Geotools on OSX 10.4

2007-03-23 Thread Andrea Aime
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > The "epsg-access" module relies on the JDBC-OBDC bridge which is > available on Windows and Linux, but not Mac-OS. ODBC was originally > Windows-specific, but I believe that it has gained some support other > than Microsoft on Windows. > > The "epsg-access" mod

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geotools-gt2-users] Building Geotools on OSX 10.4

2007-03-23 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Martin Desruisseaux a écrit : > Do we have a volunter for adding a "Mac" profile and test on Mac-OS? Sorry, I didn't noticed that an action was already taken (I was away since last saturday and just came back). Thanks for the fix. Martin -

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geotools-gt2-users] Building Geotools on OSX 10.4

2007-03-23 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
The "epsg-access" module relies on the JDBC-OBDC bridge which is available on Windows and Linux, but not Mac-OS. ODBC was originally Windows-specific, but I believe that it has gained some support other than Microsoft on Windows. The "epsg-access" module should be excluded from the build on Mac-

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bit of trouble on trunk (sorry)

2007-03-23 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > Apparently it is not just me - Identifier.getVersion() has been removed > from GeoAPI (along with VERSION_KEY). I have not yet looked at the GeoAPI changes. But it seems to me that Identifier.getVersion() and VERSION_KEY should be @deprecated before to be removed in a f

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal #2 - Organize Parsers (aka CQL, WKT and XML need a home)

2007-03-23 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > Andrea Aime wrote: >> Can we try another path? The issue with having many jars is that >> without maven it's hard to deal with them... unless we provide >> users with a list of dependencies: Just a reminder: The Geotools JAR created by Maven contains a "Class-Path" entry