[Geotools-devel] Encoding attributes question

2008-02-05 Thread Rob Atkinson
Hi, (mainly justin I expect) in xml-xsd, the Encoder class, when encoding a feature the following method gets called: encode( Object object, QName name, ContentHandler handler) which I've followed in eclipse debugger to and for the case of the gml:id of the feature, executor.getChildObject()

Re: [Geotools-devel] Interesting read for maven users

2008-02-05 Thread Ian Turton
On Feb 2, 2008 3:56 PM, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank Hardisty wrote: > > Andrea and All. > > > > This quote hit home for me: > > > > "Maven 2 is really a terrible terrible tool (with all the bugs, no > > documentation, verbose XML, ...), yet I'm finding it more and more > > usefu

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools and internationalization

2008-02-05 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Simone Giannecchini a écrit : > I am playig around with the internationalization classes in geotools. > I have a few quick questions for you :-) > > is there any doc available on thir internal machinery I never documented GeoTools IndexResourceBundle because I though that it would be temporary. T

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools and internationalization

2008-02-05 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Hi Martin, I am playig around with the internationalization classes in geotools. I have a few quick questions for you :-) >is there any doc available on thir internal machinery >would it be possible to have the message files distributed on a per module base instead of the actual centralized approa

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed Graph Extension Contribution

2008-02-05 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Francisco, We usually dont just hand commit access out. The norm is a user submits a few bugs or patches and once he has gained the confidence of a module maintainer that person can be nominated for commit access. So by all means feel free to play with code... but any actual modifications w

Re: [Geotools-devel] jaxb vs xml binding

2008-02-05 Thread Justin Deoliveira
I think it might be worth looking at. But doing bindings is still quite a bit of work. If your model is an emf model it can be a lot less work. I get the impression with jaxb though all you do is throw some annotations on some objects and your parsing/serializing is done. I could be wrong. Last

[Geotools-devel] ArcGridReader getSource implemented wrong

2008-02-05 Thread Jody Garnett
The handling of source for this class is does not agree with the contract laid down by the super class. getSource() is supposed to return the object provided by the user. The internal method checkSource(Object input, final Hints hints) goes crazy *source* with: - URLs replaced with Files - Files

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed Graph Extension Contribution

2008-02-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Sounds good; justin can you see that Francisco is set up with svn access; has a tour of the developers guide and so on. Jody > Hi Francisco, > > This sounds great!! I would be happy to help you guys in any way that > i can, be it to provide guidance on where to start or to review any > patches.

[Geotools-devel] About dblasby spike

2008-02-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi acuster I heard back from Dave: Apparently the spike has two things of value: - the filter function generator (wondered where that thing is) - some tiger line process data prep stuff Jody - This SF.net email is sponsore

Re: [Geotools-devel] jaxb vs xml binding

2008-02-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Is it worth looking at; or should Martin stick with jaxb? Does not look like we can seperate out a metadata plugin at this time ( a factory needs to be set up). Jody > I would not really call it a "standard". The one that does ship with > the core of the library is unmaintained, and the second

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed Graph Extension Contribution

2008-02-05 Thread Francisco Gabriel Malbrán
Well is great to "hear" that! Thing is how to go on. We have an idea of what the code must be. In the near future we will probably ask you some particular questions. So, reading the website, we've seen we must respect some style and other issues. I've also read that you work with svn.I don't think

Re: [Geotools-devel] error compiling coverageio

2008-02-05 Thread Adit Santokhee
Hi, It compiles fine now. I had to clean my maven repository completely and install everything again. I have also updated java. Cheers, Adit -Original Message- From: Martin Desruisseaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 February 2008 15:19 To: Adit Santokhee Cc: geotools-devel@lis

Re: [Geotools-devel] error compiling coverageio

2008-02-05 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Adit Santokhee a écrit : > I've got java 1.5.0_04. Maybe I should download newer version of java as > well? It may be help since something there is compiler bug fix. But this is just an hypothesis - I have no idea if it would really help. Martin --

Re: [Geotools-devel] error compiling coverageio

2008-02-05 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Adit, You should be able to build with 1.5 a newer version should not be required. I have to say that sometimes this error happened to me as well, I had to do a full clean up to get rid it. Maybe Martin can tell us more about it. SImone. On Feb 5, 2008 3:56 PM, Adit Santokhee <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Geotools-devel] error compiling coverageio

2008-02-05 Thread Adit Santokhee
Hi Martin, I've got java 1.5.0_04. Maybe I should download newer version of java as well? Cheers, Adit -Original Message- From: Martin Desruisseaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 February 2008 14:28 To: Adit Santokhee Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: error comp

Re: [Geotools-devel] Integration of coverage and getInfo

2008-02-05 Thread Gabriel Roldán
Hey, so you're no longer getting the xlink not found error? I'll try to deploy the required geotools snapshots as needed, sorry for the grief. Also, I've updated copy.xml to download the xpp3 dependency from the correct repo, its an xml pull parser used in wfs. cheers, Gabriel On Tuesday 05 Fe

Re: [Geotools-devel] error compiling coverageio

2008-02-05 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Adit Santokhee a écrit : > However, I am having problems compiling Coverageio module: > > F:\GEOSERVER08\geomatys\geotools\modules\unsupported\coverageio\src\main\java\org\geotools\image\io\PaletteDisposer.java:[84,46] > inconvertible types > found : java.lang.ref.Reference java.awt.image.Color

Re: [Geotools-devel] Integration of coverage and getInfo

2008-02-05 Thread jgarnett
This work has been deployed as a maven snapshot (for the udig build). This snapshot also includes: - some stuff from gabriel - some stuff in the cql module jody > Jody Garnett wrote: > > This looks to be the one we are using. I noticed that all useful > > implemenations extend: > > - AbstractGri