Thanks for the hard work Adrian; it is great to chew away on the
technical debt.
Jody
> On advice from IRC, I went ahead and committed so consider the former
> message a warning of what has happened.
>
> Changes yielded revision 29719.
>
> --adrian
>
>
> ---
On advice from IRC, I went ahead and committed so consider the former
message a warning of what has happened.
Changes yielded revision 29719.
--adrian
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to
Hey all,
I'm hoping to change all the references to
org.geotools.feature.Name (gt-api module)
to
org.geotools.feature.NameImpl
which affects lots of modules, as seen below (sorry about the
formatting).
The only modifications I made were
1. change references from Name to NameImpl
Gabriel Roldán wrote:
>> FeatureCollection and events:
>>
>> oog.feature has:
>> FeatureCollection
>> DataFeatureCollection
>>
Regardless of waiting for Justin or not these classes need to not extend
java.util.Collection; the "for loop" syntactic sugar is too
Hi Adrian,
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 12:21:36 pm Adrian Custer wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Working my way through the new feature model, there is a lot of overlap
> between the old effort and the new. It's unclear how much of this is
> work-in-progress, how much is not-yet-deprecated cruft, and how muc
Hey all,
Working my way through the new feature model, there is a lot of overlap
between the old effort and the new. It's unclear how much of this is
work-in-progress, how much is not-yet-deprecated cruft, and how much is
purely my confusion.
I hope we could clean some of this up and add explana
